So I often see a lot of these off topic threads turning into political debates, therefore I thought of something that I think could be pretty fun! This thread will be dedicated to a Mock Presidental Race! Users of the forum who wish to "run" can post their views on certain topics that are on the headlines in the United States and give their call to action for them! The people (YOU GUYS! Everyone is allowed a Vote even if you are running and can change their vote at anytime before deadline) get to vote on who they best seem fit for running the country!
The Party Nominee will be elected by June 9th at 1:00pm! From there, the actual Presidential race with the remaining 3 candidates will start! The end date for that will be June 19th at 1:00pm!
The Layout could look something like this...
------------------------------------------------------
Name: Vex03
Party: Republican
Address to Issues:
Economy: (Your stance here and call to action)
National Security: (Your stance here and call to action)
Immigration: (Your stance here and call to action)
Military: (Your stance here and call to action)
Abortion: (Your stance here and call to action)
Gun Control: (Your stance here and call to action)
(And anymore issues that you think the country is facing)
------------------------------------------------------
The 3 Main parties you can run for (for organization purposes guys) are as follows
-Democratic Party
-Republican Party
-Independent (clarify a bit)
Once you formal address issues you will be added into the poll list! The people who wish not to participate in running but want to vote may question candidates. Candidates are allowed to "debate" with other candidates on the thread, but try to keep it nice and organized so that the people (forum users) can read the thread with ease. And yes, if people who wish to run have expressed their political beliefs on other threads you can use that against them, as Candidates use other candidates pasts in real life!
Remember you want to win, so do whatever you think that takes! But remember play fair and good luck! 
Please log in to post a reply.
Lol, Although Free trade, is a very right wing idea, there are always a few Right wing politicians that support Protectionist ideas.Quasi-duck wrote:
Both!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?
Protectionism is necessary sometimes.oceanhawk wrote:
Lol, Although Free trade, is a very right wing idea, there are always a few Right wing politicians that support Protectionist ideas.Quasi-duck wrote:
Both!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?
Never, never ever ever. I hate protectionist ideas.Pablo22510 wrote:
Protectionism is necessary sometimes.oceanhawk wrote:
Lol, Although Free trade, is a very right wing idea, there are always a few Right wing politicians that support Protectionist ideas.Quasi-duck wrote:
Both!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?
Guys greatest economist of All time, Milton Friedman, I get a lot of my views from him, and he is the reason I gave up on my previous liberal views. Haha, he was also once a liberal.
Just BTW, So was Ronald Regan and Thomas Sowell, both former Liberals, then Conservative and Libertarian advocates
Protectionism is sometimes necessary, but only when TNCs are abusing of small companies. Most of the time, competition is great, except when someone cheats.oceanhawk wrote:
Never, never ever ever. I hate protectionist ideas.Pablo22510 wrote:
Protectionism is necessary sometimes.oceanhawk wrote:
Lol, Although Free trade, is a very right wing idea, there are always a few Right wing politicians that support Protectionist ideas.Quasi-duck wrote:
Both!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?Guys greatest economist of All time, Milton Friedman, I get a lot of my views from him, and he is the reason I gave up on my previous liberal views. Haha, he was also once a liberal.
Just BTW, So was Ronald Regan and Thomas Sowell, both former Liberals, then Conservative and Libertarian advocates
O yes, well somebody cheating is white collar crime, and that needs to be very harsh.Pablo22510 wrote:
Protectionism is sometimes necessary, but only when TNCs are abusing of small companies. Most of the time, competition is great, except when someone cheats.
You propose execution?!oceanhawk wrote:
O yes, well somebody cheating is white collar crime, and that needs to be very harsh.
I oppose Execution, for the propose I think there are realistic punishment that meet better terms...Quasi-duck wrote:
You propose execution?!oceanhawk wrote:
O yes, well somebody cheating is white collar crime, and that needs to be very harsh.
But otherwise, like a harsh finance and prison sentence
Pretty stupid, what is if someone kills 100 children via slow strangulation?oceanhawk wrote:
I oppose Execution, for the propose I think there are realistic punishment that meet better terms...
Sounds fine.oceanhawk wrote:
But otherwise, like a harsh finance and prison sentence
Solitary confinement, for the rest of your life... outta meet the requirementQuasi-duck wrote:
Pretty stupid, what is if someone kills 100 children via slow strangulation?oceanhawk wrote:
I oppose Execution, for the propose I think there are realistic punishment that meet better terms...Sounds fine.oceanhawk wrote:
But otherwise, like a harsh finance and prison sentence
Lol, yeah, don't let 'em see anyone until ya kill 'em. Good idea.oceanhawk wrote:
Solitary confinement, for the rest of your life... outta meet the requirement
Its worse than death.. to a lot of people anyway,Quasi-duck wrote:
Lol, yeah, don't let 'em see anyone until ya kill 'em. Good idea.oceanhawk wrote:
Solitary confinement, for the rest of your life... outta meet the requirement
So is the stuff these people do to others. Y'know, the fate "worse than death"?oceanhawk wrote:
Its worse than death.. to a lot of people anyway,
I think Death is too simple, if somebody kills somebody, I think worse should be done to them..Quasi-duck wrote:
So is the stuff these people do to others. Y'know, the fate "worse than death"?oceanhawk wrote:
Its worse than death.. to a lot of people anyway,
If Solitary confinement isnt worse, then I dont support it. I really dont like talking about these issues personally, however I think more should be done, than the crime.
Look, there is no point in letting them live. Solitary confinement will only drive them insane, then you're in trouble for violating human rights. Stick a 762 in the T and you've got a cheap death. Hell, do it by firing squad with blanks at random.oceanhawk wrote:
I think Death is too simple, if somebody kills somebody, I think worse should be done to them..If Solitary confinement isnt worse, then I dont support it. I really dont like talking about these issues personally, however I think more should be done, than the crime.
Lets move on, I really dont like this issue,Quasi-duck wrote:
Look, there is no point in letting them live. Solitary confinement will only drive them insane, then you're in trouble for violating human rights. Stick a 762 in the T and you've got a cheap death. Hell, do it by firing squad with blanks at random.oceanhawk wrote:
I think Death is too simple, if somebody kills somebody, I think worse should be done to them..If Solitary confinement isnt worse, then I dont support it. I really dont like talking about these issues personally, however I think more should be done, than the crime.
Free trade!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?Sir McSquiggles wrote:
Ive stated before, we are going to take back our jobs from the countries that stole them! We are going to make America more self sustainable, and lower unemployment rates. Also, the wall will need builders to build.
few.. okay grand, cos If not, I would have had to turn my vote, even do we both almost libertariansSir McSquiggles wrote:
Free trade!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?Sir McSquiggles wrote:
Ive stated before, we are going to take back our jobs from the countries that stole them! We are going to make America more self sustainable, and lower unemployment rates. Also, the wall will need builders to build.
Do you like Milton Friedman?
Id say he was pretty good. His views have been successful before.oceanhawk wrote:
few.. okay grand, cos If not, I would have had to turn my vote, even do we both almost libertariansSir McSquiggles wrote:
Free trade!oceanhawk wrote:
Are you a protectionist or an advocate for free trade?Sir McSquiggles wrote:
Ive stated before, we are going to take back our jobs from the countries that stole them! We are going to make America more self sustainable, and lower unemployment rates. Also, the wall will need builders to build.Do you like Milton Friedman?
He is a genious, and a brilliant person. Only if he was president, Then the two parties would be conservatives and libertarians, and they would all be nice with eachother, and work together. I see my libertarian mates as cousins, and would always put second votes to themSir McSquiggles wrote:
Id say he was pretty good. His views have been successful before.oceanhawk wrote:
Do you like Milton Friedman?
What in God's name is a 'genious'?oceanhawk wrote:
He is a genious, and a brilliant person. Only if he was president, Then the two parties would be conservatives and libertarians, and they would all be nice with eachother, and work together. I see my libertarian mates as cousins, and would always put second votes to themSir McSquiggles wrote:
Id say he was pretty good. His views have been successful before.oceanhawk wrote:
Do you like Milton Friedman?
Please log in to post a reply.
