Mock Presidential Race pt. 2

Hello! Back again with another mock presidential race!

This one will share a lot of things with the first version however, this one will be a race for the Prime Minister of The United Kingdom!

Due to the rather recent resigning of David Cameron, I thought it would be a good country. Many of you suggested we should do a race for a different country! So here we go!

Same rules apply as the last race, (reference thread "Mock Presidential Race" in "off topic")

However you will be running for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom!

The following political parties in the race are the following,

PartyPolitical PositionLeader

Conservative and Unionist PartyCentre-rightDavid Cameron
Labour PartyCentre-leftJeremy Corbyn
Scottish National PartyCentre-leftNicola Sturgeon
Liberal DemocratsCentreTim Farron

Have fun! Remember candidates can respectfully debate each other!

Poll for party representatives will end July 15th!

After that, the winners of each party will move on to the PM race!

Everybody can vote, and your vote can be changed at anytime! Just remember to use that feature responsibly!

I'm your host Vex03,

  • Let's get RIOOOGHHTT into the debates! :P

Make America Great Again.
#Trump2016

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

707 Replies

Pablo22510 wrote:

That was when it started to become more and more fledgling, as it's economy couldn't keep up with the American one.
Fledgling is new, not weak.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Fledgling is new, not weak.
Shit, lol. Sorry. So, from the 60s onwards it became weaker.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Shit, lol. Sorry. So, from the 60s onwards it became weaker.
Debatable, but I don't know too much about this time period. Definitely in 1984.

I doubt the 60's as well. The Soyuz started up at this time.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Debatable, but I don't know too much about this time period. Definitely in 1984.

I doubt the 60's as well. The Soyuz started up at this time.

I do, trust me. It was from the 60s onwards where the Soviet economy began to fall back.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

I do, trust me.
Give me a reason. I have zero.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Give me a reason. I have zero.
I've read a lot of books about the Cold War. Just out of curiosity, do you know who James Jesus Angleton was?
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

James Jesus Angleton
James Jesus Angleton was chief of the Central Intelligence Agency's Counterintelligence Staff from 1954 to 1975. His official position within the organization was "Associate Deputy Director of Operations for Counterintelligence

Pablo22510 wrote:

I've read a lot of books about the Cold War.
I cannot be assured of that. Nor of the books unbiased-ness.

Quasi-duck wrote:

James Jesus Angleton was chief of the Central Intelligence Agency's Counterintelligence Staff from 1954 to 1975. His official position within the organization was "Associate Deputy Director of Operations for Counterintelligence
Know about Operation Kholstomer?

Quasi-duck wrote:

I cannot be assured of that. Nor of the books unbiased-ness.
Yeah. I can't be assured of yours either.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Yeah. I can't be assured of yours either.
I never said I read books, nor that I read about the time periods.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Operation Kholstomer?
No.

Quasi-duck wrote:

No.
It was ficticious, invented by a novelist, but apparently based on true stuff. Angleton's great obsession (apart from the mole inside the CIA) was that the USSR was mounting a massive economical attack on the USA.

Quasi-duck wrote:

never said I read books, nor that I read about the time periods.
Yeah, never said you did.
The past is a foreign country.

T

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Not better than the capitalist West,
Hardly. The USSR only rationed up until 1935, so not even during WWII, wiki says.

On the other hand, starting from 1940, the British had to ration until 1954.

They had a leftest government after WW2... You can thank them for the rationing


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

This seems to have run dry now. Bravo.

Quasi-duck wrote:

This seems to have run dry now. Bravo.
Giving up arguing with Fact?

:00008172:

:00008172:

:00008172:


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

This seems to have run dry now. Bravo.
Giving up arguing with Fact? :00008172:

:00008172:

:00008172:

You presented nothing other than an opinion, while Pablo started talking about books.

Quasi-duck wrote:

while Pablo started talking about books.
Yeah. So what?
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

while Pablo started talking about books.
Yeah. So what?
I never said it was bad. Simply that a book, from what I googled was written in the late 1800's, has very little bearing on this.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

This seems to have run dry now. Bravo.
Giving up arguing with Fact? :00008172:

:00008172:

:00008172:

You presented nothing other than an opinion, while Pablo started talking about books
Ehh no..

Socialism never has worked, nor will it

Capitalism has never failed, nor will it..

Fact...


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Supporting evidence?

Quasi-duck wrote:

I never said it was bad. Simply that a book, from what I googled was written in the late 1800's, has very little bearing on this.
1800s???? Hell of a lot more recent.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

I never said it was bad. Simply that a book, from what I googled was written in the late 1800's, has very little bearing on this.
1800s???? Hell of a lot more recent.
Unless I am wrong.

"Kholstomer", also translated as "Strider", is one of the most striking stories in Russian literature. It was started by Leo Tolstoy in 1863 and left unfinished until 1886, when it was reworked and published as "Kholstomer: The Story of a Horse"

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch