Mock Presidential Race pt. 2

Hello! Back again with another mock presidential race!

This one will share a lot of things with the first version however, this one will be a race for the Prime Minister of The United Kingdom!

Due to the rather recent resigning of David Cameron, I thought it would be a good country. Many of you suggested we should do a race for a different country! So here we go!

Same rules apply as the last race, (reference thread "Mock Presidential Race" in "off topic")

However you will be running for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom!

The following political parties in the race are the following,

PartyPolitical PositionLeader

Conservative and Unionist PartyCentre-rightDavid Cameron
Labour PartyCentre-leftJeremy Corbyn
Scottish National PartyCentre-leftNicola Sturgeon
Liberal DemocratsCentreTim Farron

Have fun! Remember candidates can respectfully debate each other!

Poll for party representatives will end July 15th!

After that, the winners of each party will move on to the PM race!

Everybody can vote, and your vote can be changed at anytime! Just remember to use that feature responsibly!

I'm your host Vex03,

  • Let's get RIOOOGHHTT into the debates! :P

Make America Great Again.
#Trump2016

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

707 Replies

oceanhawk wrote:

Not A Communist wrote:

Only the insane vote for oceanhawk......................
And the more insane would vote for the Inquisition mongering Diabolical
I have said over and over that I don't support Inquisitions.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.
The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

They worked BEFORE they were rich, I'm just saying they didn't work AFTER they were rich.
Bill Gates still runs his own company, as do Amancio Ortega and Warren Buffet (kinda). And even if they didn't, why would they have to work if they became rich after many years of hard work and extremely successful ideas/products/investments?
Because nobody should have enough money to live their lives in luxury without working while others are in poverty and working multiple jobs, that's why.
It is none of your business whether or not someone else makes a busload of money. If they've earned so much, it is because the people that they sell or serve payed a price to them that those people thought was fair.

If someone offered you a million dollars to say whether or not someone else should build product A or product B, you would be a fool to turn down that money.

That other people think that someone IS worth a million dollars....or a billion....has nothing to do with you. Their money is theirs, not yours. You want to change that? Then go get a second job...or a third, or go out and invent a new product or offer a new service that people will want to pay for.

Remember, the rich didn't get rich by stealing their money or by coercing anyone to give it to them. The rich are rich because they earned it (well, except for the communist overlords who got rich at the point of a gun.)

Fair and square!

It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.
The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Nah, cos you wont be bothered to build it, you just take your pay, and do a lousy job..
Then you don't know me. I work surprisingly hard for someone who sits around so much. You should see my coveralls at the end of a day. Last time I used them the cement that was on them came off because I got absolutely soaked when the end came off a hose. The crotch is still covered in paint though.

Pablo22510 wrote:

They do and should get help
Then why are they still poor?
Yea, after a while.. you will realize, My family are starving, and everybody else is piggybacking off me..

Communism sucks, and should almost be considered a disease or a crime or something, because of the amount of people that die because of it is horrible..

Meanwhile.. some how this "big bad free enterprise" lifts people out of poverty,

Actually, Communism sucks worst because of how many millions of people are murdered by Communist rule. Nearly 100,000,000 people were killed by atheistic Communist regimes in the last century, seconded by the pagan Nazis and the pagan Junta of the Empire of Japan.

A higher statistic: the evils of atheism and secularism were responsible for the vast majority of all the non-natural-caused human deaths in the 20th century. Disease was responsible for a small percentage of the total and war casualties caused by the good guys (e.g. Western Allies in WWII) were responsible for the smallest minority of any significant cause.

However, the biggest and most heinous of crimes is that the human race has slaughtered over a billion souls in the past several decades through the unfathomably murderous acts of Abortion committed across the entire world.

And by the way, I didn't quote the comment where this was brought up, but there were terrible famines in Ukraine when the farms were raided by their Russian overlords...This happened many times before, during, and after WWII.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

but better than a lot of shit is still shit.
It is still better. It also made the nation a super power. How do you think it had a Cold War with America for 50 or so years?

It became a super power by holding guns to the workers heads and saying "Build more tanks, or die."

That, is communism in it's most elemental form..."work how I tell you or die".

So, if you want to keep promoting Communism, Quasi, tell me this: just who is it that you wish to threaten with death if they don't do your bidding?

It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.
The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3

Even Quasi knows his homeland will never be Communist so he may aswell give up. Communism sucks because of human greed, you want Communism? Go to Cuba or even North Korea lol.

Diabolical wrote:

So, if you want to keep promoting Communism, Quasi, tell me this: just who is it that you wish to threaten with death if they don't do your bidding?
No one, you completely missed the end of the stick, hit a tree, and fell down a chasm.

Diabolical wrote:

Remember, the rich didn't get rich by stealing their money or by coercing anyone to give it to them. The rich are rich because they earned it (well, except for the communist overlords who got rich at the point of a gun.)
Try saying that about 1920's America.

Diabolical wrote:

If someone offered you a million dollars to say whether or not someone else should build product A or product B, you would be a fool to turn down that money.
Exactly. And if you were a politician, and someone offered you a million dollars to help pass a law that helped the rich at the cost of making things worse for the poor, you'd be a fool to turn down that money.

Diabolical wrote:

Fair and square!
People can't start a public radio station, even if there's plenty of channels open, is that fair? You have to certain qualifications to be a publicly traded company, even though the only logical and beneficial reason for stock is to give an opportunity for smaller businesses to be large. Is that fair?
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

Not A Communist wrote:

Even Quasi knows his homeland will never be Communist so he may aswell give up. Communism sucks because of human greed, you want Communism? Go to Cuba or even North Korea lol.
Also, cos I would take up arms to make sure Communism never takes here

And Communism runs on greed as well,

and finally, we outta place bans or something on Communism.... Cos it has killed soo many people..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Diabolical wrote:

Remember, the rich didn't get rich by stealing their money or by coercing anyone to give it to them. The rich are rich because they earned it (well, except for the communist overlords who got rich at the point of a gun.)
Try saying that about 1920's America.

Diabolical wrote:

If someone offered you a million dollars to say whether or not someone else should build product A or product B, you would be a fool to turn down that money.
Exactly. And if you were a politician, and someone offered you a million dollars to help pass a law that helped the rich at the cost of making things worse for the poor, you'd be a fool to turn down that money.

Diabolical wrote:

Fair and square!
People can't start a public radio station, even if there's plenty of channels open, is that fair? You have to certain qualifications to be a publicly traded company, even though the only logical and beneficial reason for stock is to give an opportunity for smaller businesses to be large. Is that fair?
Government intervention, is what made the great depression and ACTUAL DESPRESSION!

The government's interventions made everything worse..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Diabolical wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

but better than a lot of shit is still shit.
It is still better. It also made the nation a super power. How do you think it had a Cold War with America for 50 or so years?
It became a super power by holding guns to the workers heads and saying "Build more tanks, or die."

That, is communism in it's most elemental form..."work how I tell you or die".

So, if you want to keep promoting Communism, Quasi, tell me this: just who is it that you wish to threaten with death if they don't do your bidding?

If you support Communism, I can only think of three reasons why

1. You hate your life

2. Your an Idiot

3. You hate the rest of humanity

or all of the above..


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

and finally, we outta place bans or something on Communism....
So you are against free speech?

oceanhawk wrote:

Cos it has killed soo many people.
Remember that time America invaded Vietnam and started murdering people?

oceanhawk wrote:

Your and Idiot
GG.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

and finally, we outta place bans or something on Communism....
So you are against free speech?

oceanhawk wrote:

Cos it has killed soo many people.
Remember that time America invaded Vietnam and started murdering people?

oceanhawk wrote:

Your an Idiot
GG.
I am against freedom, if it kills people.. in MILLIONS!

Meanwhile communists are against freedom..

I remember the Americas Intervening to save people, from the dangerous disease that is Communism...


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Diabolical wrote:

Remember, the rich didn't get rich by stealing their money or by coercing anyone to give it to them. The rich are rich because they earned it (well, except for the communist overlords who got rich at the point of a gun.)
Try saying that about 1920's America.

Diabolical wrote:

If someone offered you a million dollars to say whether or not someone else should build product A or product B, you would be a fool to turn down that money.
Exactly. And if you were a politician, and someone offered you a million dollars to help pass a law that helped the rich at the cost of making things worse for the poor, you'd be a fool to turn down that money.

Diabolical wrote:

Fair and square!
People can't start a public radio station, even if there's plenty of channels open, is that fair? You have to certain qualifications to be a publicly traded company, even though the only logical and beneficial reason for stock is to give an opportunity for smaller businesses to be large. Is that fair?
Government intervention, is what made the great depression and ACTUAL DESPRESSION!The government's interventions made everything worse..
1. I never said anything about the great depression. That occurred in the 1930s. The comment about 1920s America was about something VERY different.

2. The great depression was NOT caused by government intervention. It was mostly caused by lack of government intervention. Check the facts before posting.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

and finally, we outta place bans or something on Communism....
So you are against free speech?

oceanhawk wrote:

Cos it has killed soo many people.
Remember that time America invaded Vietnam and started murdering people?

oceanhawk wrote:

Your an Idiot
GG.
I am against freedom, if it kills people.. in MILLIONS!Meanwhile communists are against freedom..

I remember the Americas Intervening to save people, from the dangerous disease that is Communism...

I remember America gassing its own citizens... in the name of capitalism.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

and finally, we outta place bans or something on Communism....
So you are against free speech?

oceanhawk wrote:

Cos it has killed soo many people.
Remember that time America invaded Vietnam and started murdering people?

oceanhawk wrote:

Your an Idiot
GG.
I am against freedom, if it kills people.. in MILLIONS!Meanwhile communists are against freedom..

I remember the Americas Intervening to save people, from the dangerous disease that is Communism...

I remember America gassing its own citizens... in the name of capitalism.
America isnt a perfect Capitalist society

America gassing her Citizens isnt in the name of Capitalism, or has anything to do with Capitalism

Capitalism is about free voluntary exchange and small government..

Meanwhile them omadhaun communist leaders killed a lot more people. And led to the communist states, that have really struggling in life such as North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela ,

Even look at Vietnam, after they left their Communist routes a few years back and moved towards free market Capitalism, the following year

THEIR GDP DOUBLED!


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

I remember the Americas Intervening to save people, from the dangerous disease that is Communism...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_Massacre

oceanhawk wrote:

I am against freedom, if it kills people.. in MILLIONS!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history#United_States

oceanhawk wrote:

Meanwhile communists are against freedom..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism_in_Russia#Feminism_in_Soviet_society
Jeepers, them Commie's killed more people than I thought

Hate America all you want, but they dont stand for Capitalism.. IDC if you love or hate America.. But they dont stand for Capitalism

And just to add, I hear a lot about people fleeing the socialist states of North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela. But never hear much about people fleeing America or South Korea, or Hong Kong


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

@Quasi-duck I didnt finish there

Communists killed people for trying to leave their failed states and get to a Capitalist free society, where they would get something to eat


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Hate America all you want, but they dont stand for Capitalism.. IDC if you love or hate America.. But they dont stand for Capitalism
America fought wars for capitalism.....

oceanhawk wrote:

But never hear much about people fleeing America
http://globalnews.ca/news/2562300/heres-how-americans-looking-to-escape-trump-can-immigrate-to-canada/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden

oceanhawk wrote:

Jeepers, them Commie's killed more people than I thought
My Lai was US.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Communists killed people for trying to leave their failed states and get to a Capitalist free society, where they would get something to eat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_Soviet_Union_aliyah
Jeepers you must be stupid to actually want Communism anywhere in the world..

Look at Venezuela.. they are lacking basic medical supplies..

Look at North Korea, the only people that have full bellies, are the so called "Criminals" For buying food off the black market

I will tell you what, name one country where Capitalism has failed.. or a country that is doing worse since it opted to Capitalist policies and you win


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch