What are you?Not A Communist wrote:
However I just personally dislike Communism, and I don't consider myself a capitalist either.
Mock Presidential Race pt. 2
Hello! Back again with another mock presidential race!
This one will share a lot of things with the first version however, this one will be a race for the Prime Minister of The United Kingdom!
Due to the rather recent resigning of David Cameron, I thought it would be a good country. Many of you suggested we should do a race for a different country! So here we go!
Same rules apply as the last race, (reference thread "Mock Presidential Race" in "off topic")
However you will be running for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom!
The following political parties in the race are the following,
PartyPolitical PositionLeader
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Centre-right | David Cameron |
| Labour Party | Centre-left | Jeremy Corbyn |
| Scottish National Party | Centre-left | Nicola Sturgeon |
| Liberal Democrats | Centre | Tim Farron |
Have fun! Remember candidates can respectfully debate each other!
Poll for party representatives will end July 15th!
After that, the winners of each party will move on to the PM race!
Everybody can vote, and your vote can be changed at anytime! Just remember to use that feature responsibly!
I'm your host Vex03,
- Let's get RIOOOGHHTT into the debates!

#Trump2016
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
707 Replies
Of course this does.. It proves, that the government just made things worse.. The Economy would have recovered a lot faster, had the government not got in the way.. The government caused the worst of it, end ofGreatbigHippo wrote:
What are you on about? This has nothing to do with the great depression.oceanhawk wrote:
HahahaAfter the calapse... unemployment was under double digits, until the government got involved. They introduced a tariff bill on imports, even do 1000 Economists signed an opening letter, calling for Congress and the president to reject this bill.. it was passed anyway...GreatbigHippo wrote:
I don't know what event you're thinking of, but capitalism was literally exactly why the gassing was done. More specifically, it was to prevent the spread of unionization in the US during the 1920s.oceanhawk wrote:
America isnt a perfect Capitalist societyAmerica gassing her Citizens isnt in the name of Capitalism, or has anything to do with CapitalismAnd now you know how the Great Depression, got into Double digit figures

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Moderate?Not A Communist wrote:
I personally disagree with the Vietnam war anyway, and I REALLY dislike the US. I actually prefer Russia to the United states. However I just personally dislike Communism, and I don't consider myself a capitalist either.

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
a. The economy would have recovered faster, but would be extremely unstable if the government did not interfere. Long term benefit > Short term benefit. That's something you capitalists don't seem to understand.oceanhawk wrote:
Of course this does.. It proves, that the government just made things worse.. The Economy would have recovered a lot faster, had the government not got in the way.. The government caused the worst of it, end ofGreatbigHippo wrote:
What are you on about? This has nothing to do with the great depression.oceanhawk wrote:
HahahaAfter the calapse... unemployment was under double digits, until the government got involved. They introduced a tariff bill on imports, even do 1000 Economists signed an opening letter, calling for Congress and the president to reject this bill.. it was passed anyway...GreatbigHippo wrote:
I don't know what event you're thinking of, but capitalism was literally exactly why the gassing was done. More specifically, it was to prevent the spread of unionization in the US during the 1920s.oceanhawk wrote:
America isnt a perfect Capitalist societyAmerica gassing her Citizens isnt in the name of Capitalism, or has anything to do with CapitalismAnd now you know how the Great Depression, got into Double digit figures
b. This is NOT about the great depression, this is about the US labor movement, a time when companies would have their own employees murdered to prevent dissent, and police would (usually) accept bribes and look the other way.
you are a balls
I relate more to Fascism.
Fascist.Not A Communist wrote:
I relate more to Fascism.
Correct.Quasi-duck wrote:
Fascist.Not A Communist wrote:
I relate more to Fascism.
Anyways, why do you say Communism is evil, when fascism started a world war and killed millions just for being Slavic, Jewish, a gypsy, etc.?Not A Communist wrote:
Correct.Quasi-duck wrote:
Fascist.Not A Communist wrote:
I relate more to Fascism.
Last time I checked Fascism is very different to do with the 'N' word.Quasi-duck wrote:
Anyways, why do you say Communism is evil, when fascism started a world war and killed millions just for being Slavic, Jewish, a gypsy, etc.?Not A Communist wrote:
Correct.Quasi-duck wrote:
Fascist.Not A Communist wrote:
I relate more to Fascism.
Oh, well, then the only power in Europe that tried to use gas in WWII, the Pacification of Libya, attacking the Red Cross, using gas in Abyssinia, massacres in Abyssinia, and a whole bunch of stuff in WWII?Not A Communist wrote:
Last time I checked Fascism is very different to do with the 'N' word.
WE WANT ANOTHER PRESIDENTIAL RACE!

Dude I can say the same thing about the Soviets killing their own citizens, doesn't mean you'll do that too. Fascism is a relatively unfinished ideology. Just because one WW2 Nation did that it doesn't mean all people who follow Fascism want to do that lol.Quasi-duck wrote:
Oh, well, then the only power in Europe that tried to use gas in WWII, the Pacification of Libya, attacking the Red Cross, using gas in Abyssinia, massacres in Abyssinia, and a whole bunch of stuff in WWII?Not A Communist wrote:
Last time I checked Fascism is very different to do with the 'N' word.
And I could say the same for Communism.Not A Communist wrote:
Dude I can say the same thing about the Soviets killing their own citizens, doesn't mean you'll do that too. Fascism is a relatively unfinished ideology. Just because one WW2 Nation did that it doesn't mean all people who follow Fascism want to do that lol.Quasi-duck wrote:
Oh, well, then the only power in Europe that tried to use gas in WWII, the Pacification of Libya, attacking the Red Cross, using gas in Abyssinia, massacres in Abyssinia, and a whole bunch of stuff in WWII?Not A Communist wrote:
Last time I checked Fascism is very different to do with the 'N' word.
Yeah that's kinda what I was implying with the first bit of my postQuasi-duck wrote:
And I could say the same for Communism.Not A Communist wrote:
Dude I can say the same thing about the Soviets killing their own citizens, doesn't mean you'll do that too. Fascism is a relatively unfinished ideology. Just because one WW2 Nation did that it doesn't mean all people who follow Fascism want to do that lol.Quasi-duck wrote:
Oh, well, then the only power in Europe that tried to use gas in WWII, the Pacification of Libya, attacking the Red Cross, using gas in Abyssinia, massacres in Abyssinia, and a whole bunch of stuff in WWII?Not A Communist wrote:
Last time I checked Fascism is very different to do with the 'N' word.

Ah, okay. Fair enough so.Not A Communist wrote:
Yeah that's kinda what I was implying with the first bit of my post
Also, what I meant when Communism killed a lot of people
I mean, from the poverty created from Communism.. That is what killed most people, and that is why I hated it most

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
It is flabbergasting to see how insane this thread has gotten as of late. The heated discussions...the vague accusations..the war of source articles. It is insanity!
Now, if I had won the election, my ITP would have restricted all this "talk" and kept the peace. Sometimes, I think this whole "Freedom of Speech" thing is a little overrated. But still, the commies want to argue and argue how good communism and capitalism sucks. But in a communist state, they can't even say that publicly even though they'd be agreeing with their own leaders. And the capitalists want to argue and argue how good capitalism is and how communism sucks. But in a capitalist state, the unregulated masses vote in liberals that institute wealth-stealing socialistic practices of redistribution and "freedom" for amoral behavior that destroys the culture.
This is why Imperialistic Theocracy is the best form of government. The enemies of the state are not tolerated. Speech is allowed but with restrictions against anything that hurts the public faith or the state's interests. Thus rabble-rousing is prevented and chaos is kept in check. Riots and protests are non-existent as people live calm and cultured lives.
The economy is partly regulated for fairness of trade but it remains a mostly hands-off form of capitalism in the truest measure of a "laissez faire" state. And since the government operates with superior control over the morality of the people in public life, there is security and peace for all. Yet, for all this, redistribution of wealth is largely non-existent so taxes are far lower than most nations per GDP.
Admittedly, Imperial Theocracy is oppressive to those that don't like the system, but unlike all the other forms of government, this one has a relatively small cost compared to the benefits. Unlike most despotic forms of government, mine is kindhearted enough to buy out the properties of anyone who wishes to leave -- and at fair market value. We will happily let them leave and leave with their full assets in tow.
Communists and other totalitarian governments refuse to allow their "talent" to leave, thus the oppressive prison-like status of it's peoples. This is where the Theocratic part of the government shows it's true compassion. We don't shoot anyone who wants to leave. However, since most people would quickly learn how open my government is to capitalism for the every-man, even those that don't like the morality systems will choose to stay. Because everybody wants to get rich, they will gladly sign away a small amount of their former amoral freedoms for the superior benefits of the Imperium.
This, my friends is the ultimate compromise: a free market economy supporting a rigid high-morality state.
And remember, my competition, the capitalist candidate, only managed to beat my Imperial Theocratic Party by one...single...vote. By the science of statistics, clearly, this means that nearly half of all people would favor my form of government without even having a chance to yet experience the wealth that it would bring. And the rest of them would largely come around once they see the enormous prosperity.
Alas, maybe the majority will see the light next time. If I can bring about a near victory with only one election, my followers will surely convince the populous next time of the wonderful things that Imperial Theocracy can bring.
One day, the Christian Empire will rise!
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.The saying, "beating them into submission until payday", is just golden...pun intended.
R.I.P. Snickers <3
Are you going to be like Lord Sutch, just always running but never winning?Diabolical wrote:
It is flabbergasting to see how insane this thread has gotten as of late. The heated discussions...the vague accusations..the war of source articles. It is insanity!Now, if I had won the election, my ITP would have restricted all this "talk" and kept the peace. Sometimes, I think this whole "Freedom of Speech" thing is a little overrated. But still, the commies want to argue and argue how good communism and capitalism sucks. But in a communist state, they can't even say that publicly even though they'd be agreeing with their own leaders. And the capitalists want to argue and argue how good capitalism is and how communism sucks. But in a capitalist state, the unregulated masses vote in liberals that institute wealth-stealing socialistic practices of redistribution and "freedom" for amoral behavior that destroys the culture.
This is why Imperialistic Theocracy is the best form of government. The enemies of the state are not tolerated. Speech is allowed but with restrictions against anything that hurts the public faith or the state's interests. Thus rabble-rousing is prevented and chaos is kept in check. Riots and protests are non-existent as people live calm and cultured lives.
The economy is partly regulated for fairness of trade but it remains a mostly hands-off form of capitalism in the truest measure of a "laissez faire" state. And since the government operates with superior control over the morality of the people in public life, there is security and peace for all. Yet, for all this, redistribution of wealth is largely non-existent so taxes are far lower than most nations per GDP.
Admittedly, Imperial Theocracy is oppressive to those that don't like the system, but unlike all the other forms of government, this one has a relatively small cost compared to the benefits. Unlike most despotic forms of government, mine is kindhearted enough to buy out the properties of anyone who wishes to leave -- and at fair market value. We will happily let them leave and leave with their full assets in tow.
Communists and other totalitarian governments refuse to allow their "talent" to leave, thus the oppressive prison-like status of it's peoples. This is where the Theocratic part of the government shows it's true compassion. We don't shoot anyone who wants to leave. However, since most people would quickly learn how open my government is to capitalism for the every-man, even those that don't like the morality systems will choose to stay. Because everybody wants to get rich, they will gladly sign away a small amount of their former amoral freedoms for the superior benefits of the Imperium.
This, my friends is the ultimate compromise: a free market economy supporting a rigid high-morality state.
And remember, my competition, the capitalist candidate, only managed to beat my Imperial Theocratic Party by one...single...vote. By the science of statistics, clearly, this means that nearly half of all people would favor my form of government without even having a chance to yet experience the wealth that it would bring. And the rest of them would largely come around once they see the enormous prosperity.
Alas, maybe the majority will see the light next time. If I can bring about a near victory with only one election, my followers will surely convince the populous next time of the wonderful things that Imperial Theocracy can bring.
One day, the Christian Empire will rise!

Lads, just look at the facts...
Capitalism hasnt ever failed
Communism always fails
And when I said Communism kills people, I meant through the poverty and starvation created due to communism
Most capitalist nation on earth has the highest life expectancy..
Does Communism even have any good stats, to back up its claim?
I beleive in freedom of speech, but Communism is a disease. It is a virus, that infects nations. It kill's and crumbles a nation and a nations people.
That is one of the many reason, I H8 It

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
And what nation is that?oceanhawk wrote:
Most capitalist nation on earth has the highest life expectancy..
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.