Mock Presidential Race pt. 2

Hello! Back again with another mock presidential race!

This one will share a lot of things with the first version however, this one will be a race for the Prime Minister of The United Kingdom!

Due to the rather recent resigning of David Cameron, I thought it would be a good country. Many of you suggested we should do a race for a different country! So here we go!

Same rules apply as the last race, (reference thread "Mock Presidential Race" in "off topic")

However you will be running for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom!

The following political parties in the race are the following,

PartyPolitical PositionLeader

Conservative and Unionist PartyCentre-rightDavid Cameron
Labour PartyCentre-leftJeremy Corbyn
Scottish National PartyCentre-leftNicola Sturgeon
Liberal DemocratsCentreTim Farron

Have fun! Remember candidates can respectfully debate each other!

Poll for party representatives will end July 15th!

After that, the winners of each party will move on to the PM race!

Everybody can vote, and your vote can be changed at anytime! Just remember to use that feature responsibly!

I'm your host Vex03,

  • Let's get RIOOOGHHTT into the debates! :P

Make America Great Again.
#Trump2016

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

707 Replies

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Did you miss the part where we said school vouchers for poor disadvantaged children?
Pfft, discount vouchers don't matter if you can't pay anyways.

oceanhawk wrote:

Your reading seems to be bad, I can think of why
*can't, you also missed a full stop.
Dont think I mentioned discount either, these are full and some partial vouchers as well.

So why do you want to keep poor people poor?


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Dont think I mentioned discount either, these are full and some partial vouchers as well.
Oh, I didn't really bother reading most of your crap, I just skimmed it and saw school vouchers. Anyway, better off just giving everyone free school.

oceanhawk wrote:

So why do you want to keep poor people poor?
You are the one taking away free schooling for all.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Dont think I mentioned discount either, these are full and some partial vouchers as well.
Oh, I didn't really bother reading most of your crap, I just skimmed it and saw school vouchers. Anyway, better off just giving everyone free school.

oceanhawk wrote:

So why do you want to keep poor people poor?
You are the one taking away free schooling for all.
There is not such thing as free school, you pay for it with your tax dollars. But by paying with your tax dollars, you fund inefficient schools, which you dont have a choice in picking

Private schools are better than public schools, and no there is no point giving "public education" to all, as it sucks. Public Education is inferior to private schools. I have been to both, and Private schools are a lot better. Not only for the Education but for the facilities and the environment


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Private schools are better than public schools, and no there is no point giving "public education" to all, as it sucks. Public Education is inferior to private schools. I have been to both, and Private schools are a lot better. Not only for the Education but for the facilities and the environment
Lol, you're right. It must be good if it is run by cultists (the latter one).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharishi_School

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Delphian_School

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Private schools are better than public schools, and no there is no point giving "public education" to all, as it sucks. Public Education is inferior to private schools. I have been to both, and Private schools are a lot better. Not only for the Education but for the facilities and the environment
Lol, you're right. It must be good if it is run by cultists (the latter one).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharishi_School

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Delphian_School

What you on about?

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

What you on about?
Are you that dim? My links are private schools. One run by cultists, one run with a program that uses "consciousness-based education".

Obviously both crap. Especially that cultist one....

oceanhawk wrote:

There is not such thing as free school, you pay for it with your tax dollars. But by paying with your tax dollars, you fund inefficient schools, which you dont have a choice in picking
Lol, that's a copy and paste off Milton Friedman.
The past is a foreign country.

Look voters, he can't even come up with his own lines...

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

There is not such thing as free school, you pay for it with your tax dollars. But by paying with your tax dollars, you fund inefficient schools, which you dont have a choice in picking
Lol, that's a copy and paste off Milton Friedman.
that aitn true, I typed it myself, hence the over use of commas and no full stops

go find me a link or something with him saying that pls.......


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

I'mmmm gonna vote for a Communist I think. :/

oceanhawk wrote:

that aitn true, I typed it myself, hence the over use of commas and no full stops

go find me a link or something with him saying that pls.......

It's not a word-by-word copy and paste, but pretty much what he says in 'Free to Choose'.
The past is a foreign country.

Do you see what the UK is becoming? Vote Scottish National party, gain independence, and escape this political hell. If we don't do it now, there may never be another chance.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

that aitn true, I typed it myself, hence the over use of commas and no full stops

go find me a link or something with him saying that pls.......

It's not a word-by-word copy and paste, but pretty much what he says in 'Free to Choose'.
Tell me where, seriously that a awful claim and I wanna hear your evidence

yes it is the same belief that we put more people into public schools, but what I posted there, I typed


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Tell me where, seriously that a awful claim and I wanna hear your evidence
Chapter 2.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Tell me where, seriously that a awful claim and I wanna hear your evidence
Chapter 2.
Sorry eveidence and link, that is too misleading

I presume from free to choice?

The ideas that he supports are equal to mine, and yes I got most of my views from the likes of him.

But I didnt copy and paste, so your claim is false, and like the commies you cant provide evidence :P

::reals in the whip::


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Sorry eveidence and link, that is too misleading

I presume from free to choice?

From free to Choose. Chapter 2.

oceanhawk wrote:

But I didnt copy and paste
I never said that you copied and pasted.
The past is a foreign country.

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Do you see what the UK is becoming? Vote Scottish National party, gain independence, and escape this political hell. If we don't do it now, there may never be another chance.
Haha! And what exactly are you going to do when you get Independence? You really have no economy. Scotland is screwed outside of Britain lol.

Not A Communist wrote:

Haha! And what exactly are you going to do when you get Independence? You really have no economy. Scotland is screwed outside of Britain lol.
EU.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Not A Communist wrote:

Haha! And what exactly are you going to do when you get Independence? You really have no economy. Scotland is screwed outside of Britain lol.
EU.
I've heard that Scotland won't be able to join the EU for a while though, if ever.

Not A Communist wrote:

I've heard that Scotland won't be able to join the EU for a while though, if ever.
I've heard the opposite.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch