Mock Presidential Race Pt. 3

Per popular demand, the Race is back! Same rules apply as previous races, however I will re-state some of the more important things in this thread,

-Everyone can run for president/PM/Chancellor

-Everyone can vote, whether you are a candidate or voter.

-Candidates can debate on this thread. Try to keep it semi-respectful otherwise I will request the thread to be closed under extreme circumstances (I'm pretty laid back on this, so don't be afraid)

-Voters may also question candidates and participate in debates.

-Voters may change votes at any time.

-If candidates wish to vote for another candidate they must resign from the race.

-New Rule: Candidates may NOT switch political parties to enable themselves to stay in race.

With all the rules Mumbo-jumbo aside now, let's get right into it!

First and foremost, the country you will all be running for is becoming the President of Germany!

Instead of setting political parties for you all to choose from, I am allowing you to pick any EXISTING political party in Germany. With the obvious exclusion of any sort of fascist, Nazi party due to Bytro's terms.

Check here often for updates or anything I add during the race. Everything will run relatively the same as the last 2!

Please format your application into the race as follows:

-Forum name

-Political Party you wish to represent

-Maybe give first address on some major issues

(Note: Bolding your application will increase the chances of me spotting it through all the debating! Adding this info will make it much easier for me to sort through things so I appreciate it !)

From there, the rest is up to you guys!

Good luck! Let's get RIOOGHHT into the debates :P

The party primaries will end September 16th!

Note: Any use of this format, or idea is prohibited on the Call of War Forums, unless consent is given by the creator- Vex03.

Make America Great Again.
#Trump2016

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

418 Replies

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Your dumb
You're*
You are a communist, you are extreme on the spectrum :P
You forgot the full stop.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Your dumb
You're*
You are a communist, you are extreme on the spectrum :P
You forgot the full stop.
You also forgot basic economics!

or were you always little lacking of the economic intelligence?


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

You also forgot basic economics!

or were you always a little lacking of the economic intelligence?

Poor formatting, starts a sentence on a conjunction, no capital letter on the second sentence, forgets the letter/word "a"(inserted with colour), and a poor insult to boot.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

You also forgot basic economics!

or were you always a little lacking of the economic intelligence?

Poor formatting, starts a sentence on a conjunction, no capital letter on the second sentence, forgets the letter/word "a"(inserted with colour), and a poor insult to boot.
I dont need to insult you.. you insult yourself and your intelligence enough, just by being a communist

I think I said it perfectly, when I said you were extreme on the spectrum


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

I don't need to insult you.. you insult yourself and your intelligence enough, just by being a communist.
I will just fix the mistakes with red letters/punctuation. By the way, you have insulted me about once, at least, in your last few posts*. Very childish of you, though expected of someone with poor grammar and punctuation.

*Depends on what you/I take as an insult.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

I don't need to insult you.. you insult yourself and your intelligence enough, just by being a communist.
I will just fix the mistakes with red letters/punctuation. By the way, you have insulted me about once, at least, in your last few posts*. Very childish of you, though expected of someone with poor grammar and punctuation.

*Depends on what you/I take as an insult.

Supporting communism, is just an insult to yourself and to humanity

you must really hate the world, if you like communism, there just aint any other explanation, to like the poverty and hunger created...


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

Supporting communism, is just an insult to yourself and to humanity

you must really hate the world, if you like communism, there just aint any other explanation, to like the poverty and hunger created...

To be completely honest, it is getting to a point where I am feeling sorry for you, being so close-minded.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Supporting communism, is just an insult to yourself and to humanity

you must really hate the world, if you like communism, there just aint any other explanation, to like the poverty and hunger created...

To be completely honest, it is getting to a point where I am feeling sorry for you, being so close-minded.
you cannot be for real...

I was a liberal before, left leaning.. then I came across Milton Friedman, then after like minutes, I realized.. huh Im wrong

you are the one with the closed mind, you have no reason for communism working, no evidence.. and again dont seem to care that every shred of evidence says that communism fails


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

@oceanhawk, you won't accept facts you disagree with. How can we trust you have an unbiased opinion when you either ignore or use no true scotsman on every argument against you.
That isnt even a real argument..

What I posted, wasnt opinion, it was pure fact..

the unemployment rate hit double digits, once the government got invovled

you stupid commies, refuse to except facts and figuers

and maybe that that stupid ideolgy, that has killed more people, that the FU$&ING WORLD WARS KILLED

you actually support?

If you wanted to call yourself center left liberal, with a expanded government, but going extreme as a socialist, just means one thing..

Your dumb :)

This wasn't an argument. This was me withdrawing myself from the debate, because I refuse to debate with someone who cannot listen to what he doesn't want to hear.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

oceanhawk wrote:

you cannot be for real...

I was a liberal before, left leaning.. then I came across Milton Friedman, then after like minutes, I realized.. huh Im wrong

you are the one with the closed mind, you have no reason for communism working, no evidence.. and again dont seem to care that every shred of evidence says that communism fails

Lol. It only took a few minutes to change your mind? Talk about faith.

GreatbigHippo wrote:

This wasn't an argument. This was me withdrawing myself from the debate, because I refuse to debate with someone who cannot listen to what he doesn't want to hear.
Lol you bring it up in literally every thread, and that last bit sounds a helluva lot like you.

OK donald and hilary you dont have to fight about this.


ROLEPLAYERS UNION
PLEASE SIGN UP

worldwar2history wrote:

OK donald and hilary you dont have to fight about this.
Lol.

Me watching this debate like...

Make America Great Again.
#Trump2016

Question to candidates (to kind of steer it away from solely economics):

Regarding Germany's foreign policy, as president, what would you do to defeat or weaken Isis ?

Make America Great Again.
#Trump2016

Quasi-duck wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

This wasn't an argument. This was me withdrawing myself from the debate, because I refuse to debate with someone who cannot listen to what he doesn't want to hear.
Lol you bring it up in literally every thread, and that last bit sounds a helluva lot like you.
I don't remember bringing anything like this up before, and I thought I was on your side.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

vex03 wrote:

hat would you do to defeat or weaken Isis ?
I would send German planes and drones to strike at ISIS. Then work closely with the UK, France and US to provide intel and training to opposition forces on the ground as well as launching a campaign to push back ISIS on the internet. Ontop of this the government will target vulnerable youths who may be disillusioned with ISIS with an education programme and a watchful eye to make sure they dont commit acts of terror.

Forum Gang Divine Entity

Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

You also forgot basic economics!

or were you always a little lacking of the economic intelligence?

Poor formatting, starts a sentence on a conjunction, no capital letter on the second sentence, forgets the letter/word "a"(inserted with colour), and a poor insult to boot.
You are literally correcting someones grammar... on an online strategy game's forum.. you must have a lot of time on your hands.

GreatbigHippo wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

GreatbigHippo wrote:

This wasn't an argument. This was me withdrawing myself from the debate, because I refuse to debate with someone who cannot listen to what he doesn't want to hear.
Lol you bring it up in literally every thread, and that last bit sounds a helluva lot like you.
I don't remember bringing anything like this up before, and I thought I was on your side.
So did I. Apologies, mistook you for Ocean. I must be a US drone operator :P

vex03 wrote:

Regarding Germany's foreign policy, as president, what would you do to defeat or weaken Isis ?
Nothing. Germany should not intervene in foreign affairs during wartime. Germany is neither in much of a position to help (Central Europe), nor has much of a reputation for defeating insurgents.

On top of this, our armed forces are small and the German people aren't exactly in favour of war, eh?

Not A Communist wrote:

You are literally correcting someone's grammar... on an online strategy game's forum.. you must have a lot of time on your hands.
Most of my friends live in the countryside, while I live in the town. Not much else I can do.

Quasi-duck wrote:

ou guys musn't have science as a mandatory subject in Spanish, right? What is, moist litmus paper, see if it supports a flame (test for O2, yeah, but air supports it too).

Oh yeah, and it is more or less everywhere.

It is an obligatory subject, matter of fact. I guess it's just hard to explain what I'm trying to say.

Quasi-duck wrote:

.......

A country that big, and that new, with a relatively new leader, undergoing an industrial revolution, while trying to re-arm from the disasters of the last two governments, on top of relatively poor infrastructure, with roads that are mud for most of the year, is bound to have a few hiccups.

You call a famine that killed millions 'a few hiccups'. Then I guess you consider the Holocaust 'a few hiccups' too.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Half of America thought slavery was worth fighting a war for 4 years to keep it. That isn't good, nor is what you say an excuse.
No, what I say isn't an excuse, it is the truth. The side that wanted slavery abolished won. Slavery wasabolished, end of.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Oh yeah, well then Alabama bans self-pleasure toys, black people are still more likely to be arrested/shot/imprisoned, the first black president had people make models of him being hung, Michael Donald was lynched in 1981, the KKK is alive and relatively well, what else?
Alabama bans self-pleasure toys. I don't agree with that, and it isn't part of my presidential program. Neither is racism. Let's get back on topic.
The past is a foreign country.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch