Mock presidential race pt.3- Voting

Soviet onion republic wrote:

why not vote for me

I never switched my vote bc I don’t want to be bullied by u Claudio and Carking

FINAL THREAD,

GO HERE:

[Mock presidential race pt.3- Voting FINAL

Carking the 6th wrote:

FINAL THREAD,

GO HERE:

Mock presidential race pt.3- Voting FINAL

that new pfp looks good on you,! you give it a shine

Claudio NVKP wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Bring them here to vote, then

@Renarsm

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Anyone whose PFP is a dictator can never be trustworthy!

Idk who to vote for

Vote for me, or we will drag you to crimea

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

I abstain.

I think I'm going to boycott and abstain. This election was meant to be a fun activity for everyone to participate in, but it has not gone that way at all. Attacks have become increasingly personal instead of policy-based. It's now less about proving the preferred candidate right and more about beating down the other. This isn't what I signed up for. This is an election for a fictional position that holds no power, and this should be treated as such. I know @Claudio NVKP and @TheZhukov, and they are both great people, but it pains me to see everyone throwing dirt in each other's faces over this. This has really gone bad. I hope this is a lesson to some of those.

btw, if you are reading this thinking "oh yay, one less point for them or oh no, one less point for us", chances are, you're part of the problem.

Donk2.0 wrote:

I think I'm going to boycott and abstain. This election was meant to be a fun activity for everyone to participate in, but it has not gone that way at all. Attacks have become increasingly personal instead of policy-based. It's now less about proving the preferred candidate right and more about beating down the other. This isn't what I signed up for. This is an election for a fictional position that holds no power, and this should be treated as such. I know @Claudio NVKP and @TheZhukov, and they are both great people, but it pains me to see everyone throwing dirt in each other's faces over this. This has really gone bad. I hope this is a lesson to some of those.

btw, if you are reading this thinking "oh yay, one less point for them or oh no, one less point for us", chances are, you're part of the problem.

Carking the 6th wrote:

FINAL THREAD,

GO HERE:

[Mock presidential race pt.3- Voting FINAL

What can I say?

Humans are kind of problems sometimes and yes, statistics is a very competitive thing.

But...I'm just worried about the rules that this gentleman will put...

If I pick somebody, they'll have the power to rule.

Unless this vote was merely for fun and they have no power after the votes then it's no problem at all.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Under Salazar many Portuguese people were harassed, bullied, murdered, and tortured…

Kadeko wrote:

I don't want to vote Claudio who's a real bully...

He bullied Amotah

And all of us, if he wishes...

But I never saw Zhukov did that.

Donk2.0 wrote:

I think I'm going to boycott and abstain. This election was meant to be a fun activity for everyone to participate in, but it has not gone that way at all. Attacks have become increasingly personal instead of policy-based. It's now less about proving the preferred candidate right and more about beating down the other. This isn't what I signed up for. This is an election for a fictional position that holds no power, and this should be treated as such. I know @Claudio NVKP and @TheZhukov, and they are both great people, but it pains me to see everyone throwing dirt in each other's faces over this. This has really gone bad. I hope this is a lesson to some of those.

btw, if you are reading this thinking "oh yay, one less point for them or oh no, one less point for us", chances are, you're part of the problem.

You would hypothetically have a high post in Zhukov's leadership, if he wins. This is what you guys have voted for?

People talk about 'bullying', 'being rude' I have never EVER dragged personal comments in this. Even if i have, it was on the topic of their policy.

You have not only lured @Hifive5 and @Taffyta Muttonfudge to NOT vote for me, and you even stated that we will win if @Taffyta Muttonfudge were to vote for me. You people then start a real life political conflict on how 'Saviour killed people' which has no place or regard in the forum policy. Even if she abstained, if we count @Cecil Rhodes. I would've won. You now create another thread and start recounting votes because you were losing, unnoble.

I understand your 'free speech', but this is sad.

If votes do NOT remain same, and votes are recounted, wouldn't that damage your own respect?

Carking the 6th wrote:

Vandermeer wrote:

Sir, I regret to inform you of this, but I have decided to cast my vote for Claudio.

So it was a Claudio robot! Aha! Your cannot be counted, unfortunately.

Wth.