Mock presidential race pt.3- Voting FINAL

@Soviet onion republic @Hifive5 @Zaktty @Renarsm @Komrade Khrushchev @Cecil Rhodes. @Taffyta Muttonfudge do NOT fall into their false propaganda, vote for us.

Why

vote for me? Like you voted for me in the other thread.

@Carking the 6th this in unfair, i was winning 10-8 in the other thread and you just make a new one? And start counting votes again? Biased, unnoble.

I vote Claudio NVKP

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Should we postpone the vote?

OFC i will vote for you. im your running mate!

i vote for @Claudio NVKP

Need to post this here too:

Unnoble CarKing, we understand you want voters, but these personal insults... We should hereby end personal insults or motives to lure someone to change their vote. 'He said this bad thing 3500 years ago', 'he has a dictator pfp' or 'i will drag you to crimea' has no place in the forum elections. You are just making in unfun for others. I and my run mate or my supporters have never brought this in chart, we only brought up forum policy, nothing else. This election is supposed to be for the *forum* leader, not who you prefer more personally. What's the point of policies and debate then, Carking?

You would hypothetically have a high post in Zhukov's leadership, if he wins. This is what you guys have voted for?

People talk about 'bullying', 'being rude' I have never EVER dragged personal comments in this. Even if i have, it was on the topic of their policy.

You have not only lured @Hifive5 and @Taffyta Muttonfudge to NOT vote for me, and you even stated that we will win if @Taffyta Muttonfudge were to vote for me. You people then start a real life political conflict on how 'Saviour killed people' which has no place or regard in the forum policy. Even if she abstained, if we count @Cecil Rhodes. I would've won. You now create another thread and start recounting votes because you were losing, unnoble.

I understand your 'free speech', but this is sad.

If votes do NOT remain same, and votes are recounted, wouldn't that damage your own respect?

See, this is what higher members of the FWP are doing....

Also, what makes it too hard to counted.

It was 8-8 after @Renarsm had voted

9-8 after @WednesdayAddams which you dod not want to count until tomorrow because they are 'unnoble'.

10-8 after @Vandermeer voted which you tried all your best saying i wanted to cut off 'human rights' even though there is no mention of anything similar in my policy. Even still, i got the vote. Then you called them my robot and they wouldn't be counted.

11-8 after @Taffyta Muttonfudge voted, then you decided to bring a real life political brawl into this, which made her recall her vote. So, 10-8.

11-8 again after @Cecil Rhodes. voted, which you said wouldn't be counted either because they considered me a communist and they are rasict.

Then all of this mess created by you, made Donk abstain, 10-8.

Aragosta was fixed and didn't change, but this new thread changed her mind too. 9-8.

I call on everyone who voted for the FWP to rethink their choice, after what has happened.

Also, what about my coalition with @Zaktty

I no longer abstain. I vote for @Claudio NVKP

10-8

Claudio NVKP wrote:

11-8 after @Taffyta Muttonfudge voted, then you decided to bring a real life political brawl into this, which made her recall her vote. So, 10-8.

Taffyta Muttonfudge wrote:

Claudio NVKP wrote:

11-8 after @Taffyta Muttonfudge voted, then you decided to bring a real life political brawl into this, which made her recall her vote. So, 10-8.

I no longer abstain!

11-8 in favor of Claudio

7-7, not counting votes from the other thread now.

Claudio NVKP wrote:

Need to post this here too:

Unnoble CarKing, we understand you want voters, but these personal insults... We should hereby end personal insults or motives to lure someone to change their vote. 'He said this bad thing 3500 years ago', 'he has a dictator pfp' or 'i will drag you to crimea' has no place in the forum elections. You are just making in unfun for others. I and my run mate or my supporters have never brought this in chart, we only brought up forum policy, nothing else. This election is supposed to be for the *forum* leader, not who you prefer more personally. What's the point of policies and debate then, Carking?

You would hypothetically have a high post in Zhukov's leadership, if he wins. This is what you guys have voted for?

People talk about 'bullying', 'being rude' I have never EVER dragged personal comments in this. Even if i have, it was on the topic of their policy.

You have not only lured @Hifive5 and @Taffyta Muttonfudge to NOT vote for me, and you even stated that we will win if @Taffyta Muttonfudge were to vote for me. You people then start a real life political conflict on how 'Saviour killed people' which has no place or regard in the forum policy. Even if she abstained, if we count @Cecil Rhodes. I would've won. You now create another thread and start recounting votes because you were losing, unnoble.

I understand your 'free speech', but this is sad.

If votes do NOT remain same, and votes are recounted, wouldn't that damage your own respect?

See, this is what higher members of the FWP are doing....

Claudio NVKP wrote:

Karl von Krass wrote:

Everybody. Why do u bulli

Because bulling is fun . I love watching my soft hearted counterparts suffer.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Claudio NVKP wrote:

Karl von Krass wrote:

Everybody. Why do u bulli

Because bulling is fun . I love watching my soft hearted counterparts

Same could be said about all the other ones as well, then.