North Korea

If they send a nuke, we would know before it hits us. I think we would know way before they even send one lol. By then one of US allies will invade. Even China is getting a bit upset by them.

Sir McSquiggles wrote:

Even China is getting a bit upset by them.

I think both answers are correct. I just feel that the first option would be the result if they attacked.

North Korea is a threat, not due to military power but due to the fact they will destabilize the region. Now North korea's army may be large but its poorly trained and equipped and so would be a shove over for Nato forces but china might get involved, it depends how much they value trade with nato countries, and Russia could use the opportunity to strike at Nato. This could cause splitting of Nato forces and basicly WW3. It may not be a nuclear war but it's definitely a war involving many countries.

Ellio_98 wrote:

North Korea is a threat, not due to military power but due to the fact they will destabilize the region. Now North korea's army may be large but its poorly trained and equipped and so would be a shove over for Nato forces but china might get involved, it depends how much they value trade with nato countries, and Russia could use the opportunity to strike at Nato. This could cause splitting of Nato forces and basicly WW3. It may not be a nuclear war but it's definitely a war involving many countries.

purplepizza117 wrote:

Not just to the US but to stability in the region. If China, Japan, and the US invades, it would jeopardise everything in Asia.

I'm sad that you do a poll and the answer is it zero threat or 100 come on stands no chance to major threat . simple put I wont vote because there is no middle ground.

What do you mean? Either they can cause trouble or they won't, you can vote and then elaborate your interpretation of your choice, as the above gentlemen have