OH MY GOODNESS, Putin and Trump!

I'm not kidding, Putin and Trump just released a statement that they would be willing to sign an alliance treaty if Trump is elected. I just saw it on the LA Times, here, take a look...

http://www.latlmes.com/world/trump-and-putin-sign-possible-russo-american-treaty-1

;( ;( ;( ;( ;( ;( ;( ;(

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

50 Replies

purplepizza117 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

purplepizza117 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Id Vote for Johnson,
Plus, I don't know if anyone knows this, Johnson scaled Everest!
What? really?
Yeah! I think it may say it on the website.
Meanwhile the other 2 candidates.... meh

Johnson 2016!


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Obama 2016!

The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Obama 2016!
why on earth would we want 4 more years of him?

The leftests havent done a whole lot of good, we need some conservatives from the right...

Unforutantly, the republican party haven't really produced any conservatives..

So we need to vote Johnson :P


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

The way the American elections work if Johnson gets only a few of the votes he could potentially get elected in a close race between Clinton and Trump. The candidate with the majority of electoral college votes gets elected to be president, not with the most. So if Clinton, Trump and Johnson have less than the majority of votes, the election goes to the house of representatives. The people in the house of representatives gets to vote on whoever they want, and whoever wins that election wins the entire presidential race. The last time an election went to the house of representatives was in 1800.

Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls

GreatbigHippo wrote:

The way the American elections work if Johnson gets only a few of the votes he could potentially get elected in a close race between Clinton and Trump. The candidate with the majority of electoral college votes gets elected to be president, not with the most. So if Clinton, Trump and Johnson have less than the majority of votes, the election goes to the house of representatives. The people in the house of representatives gets to vote on whoever they want, and whoever wins that election wins the entire presidential race. The last time an election went to the house of representatives was in 1800.
Johnson has a legitimate, if small, chance.

GreatbigHippo wrote:

The way the American elections work if Johnson gets only a few of the votes he could potentially get elected in a close race between Clinton and Trump. The candidate with the majority of electoral college votes gets elected to be president, not with the most. So if Clinton, Trump and Johnson have less than the majority of votes, the election goes to the house of representatives. The people in the house of representatives gets to vote on whoever they want, and whoever wins that election wins the entire presidential race. The last time an election went to the house of representatives was in 1800.
Yea, I am well aware of the America electoral college, its a pretty good system, to an outsider..

But didnt know that the election went to the house, but if it did go to the house, could Johnson get it?

Like a lot of democrats are divided and The republicans are divided as well...

Johnson can appeal to both, well his social views are similar to the majortiy of Democrats, and their fiscal views are extreme conservative.. He could pull it off... Only if he gets in the debates, and to do that, he needs to make 15% in the polls

But, Mitt Rommney put his support behind Johnson and Welds, having welds on that ticket is what will make it do a lot better. He was very popular in Massachusetts. Johnson appears to be popular in New Mexico, but I stand to be corrected there..

A lot of republicans are putting support behind Johnson, personally Id rather have seen Welds as president nominee, and Johnson as VP

I think if the ticket was like that, it would have been a lot better...

But Look at the electorate, The border states to the south, could support Trump, with his immigration joke of an idea, but Johnson was actually a governer of a state on the border, and could really be an alternative for those who care about immigration...

It all depends on weather or not johnson gets to 15% in the polls


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

why on earth would we want 4 more years of him?
'Cos he's awesome. Better than your man Johnson.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

why on earth would we want 4 more years of him?
'Cos he's awesome. Better than your man Johnson.
you thick?

K I am an extreme conservative, but I wouldnt be a libertarian

and also, in this election johnson everytime

and even still, Id take most people from the right, over you and your liberal leftest buddies

and finnaly, Johnson over Biden...

J


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

oceanhawk wrote:

you thick?

K I am an extreme conservative, but I wouldnt be a libertarian

and also, in this election johnson everytime

and even still, Id take most people from the right, over you and your liberal leftest buddies

and finnaly, Johnson over Biden...

BIden reks Johnson.

The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

you thick?

K I am an extreme conservative, but I wouldnt be a libertarian

and also, in this election johnson everytime

and even still, Id take most people from the right, over you and your liberal leftest buddies

and finnaly, Johnson over Biden...

BIden reks Johnson.

so liberals beat libertarains...

yea no...


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch