Peace negotiations between Poland and Sweden 1936 RP

@russ_russ1

The Swedish Piers Morgan

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

89 Replies

Mexico invaded me without a declaration of war. They said that because they were Poland's ally, It was legal. They ignored the 24 hour peace period as well. Can sombody tell them that it is a rulebreak. I've already had to defend against a stack of 15 of them and now a stack of 10 has turned up.

The Swedish Piers Morgan

Carking the 6th wrote:

Yeah, 15k of that.
*he owes me 20k. And @noblebright Mexico is Mexico, complain to her not me lol
…it’s silly time……….:3

russ_russ1 wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Yeah, 15k of that.
*he owes me 20k. And @noblebright Mexico is Mexico, complain to her not me lol
You refused the trade.
The Swedish Piers Morgan

I did not. I pressed accept, and you said that you had insufficient resources.

…it’s silly time……….:3

why would I, decline 20,000 Food? Are you trying to say that I’m stupid?

…it’s silly time……….:3

I will give Sweden Stockholm and Sodertalje. This will only happen when Sweden will be able to pay the 20,000 food. Sweden will NOT get his core lands back. 50% of Polish forces will move out of Sweden. That is all I will accept too

…it’s silly time……….:3

I'm not getting any food. Germany took Malmo, my only food province apart from Uppsala which you also took.

The Swedish Piers Morgan

The mods have ordered you to give them back.

The Swedish Piers Morgan

There will be no compromise. It is an order. Hand back half of stolen resources and all core land.


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Yes, AN ORDER. Refuse and we will ban you form future RPs. Taking his cores will cripple him

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

TheZhukov wrote:

Yes, AN ORDER. Refuse and we will ban you form future RPs. Taking his cores will cripple him
He committed genocide against my people and started and unprovoked war against me? 2 other people are invading him, but yeah, go ahead and attack me for my decision to fight back when I wanted nothing to do with him in the first place. It is his fault he is in this position.
…it’s silly time……….:3

I am fine with giving him Stockholm back. Nothing else. He has been proven to spread lies about me, and is clearly unable to act like a normal human. His temper tantrums are crazy, and his behaviour is unacceptable. But yes, please attack me for defending myself and not throwing a fit.

…it’s silly time……….:3

look, I said I would keep an eye on him, he can't fight you anyway. I'm not angry because you beat him, I am angry because you are occupying his cores. Just listen to me and give ti back

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

He needs to learn that crying and complaining when losing is not acceptable. He has also committed various rule breaks, but I don’t hear you guys talking about them? Why is that? A bit of bias don’t you think so? Answer that question please and thank you.

…it’s silly time……….:3

What rulebreaks? The artillery automatically opens fire when a unit comes within range. Also, you can't really punish him for crying when losing, tho we have reprimanded you both for using the newspaper as a chat

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

Just tell me the rulebreaks

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

TheZhukov wrote:

What rulebreaks? The artillery automatically opens fire when a unit comes within range. Also, you can't really punish him for crying when losing, tho we have reprimanded you both for using the newspaper as a chat
all I’m trying to say Zhukov is stop being so biased. If someone committed genocide against your people, you’d want them gone. I know Sweden has provided his story to you about how im “so awful and how i want to commit so many rule breaks.” There’s two sides to every story. I’ll say this again. Sweden should not have gone to war with me. It’s HIS fault he’s in HIS position. That is all.
…it’s silly time……….:3

Going ot war with you was not a rulebreak, he had a right to do so. A genocide is also bad, but not a rulebreak. I'm not being biased. he lost Norway, Finland, his entire army, the baltics and denmark. AND he is being attacked by two other nations. Just let him have it, otherwise he may as well give up. You already won. Imagine if you attacked me, and I defeated you and did that

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

What is your side of the story

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

TheZhukov wrote:

Going ot war with you was not a rulebreak, he had a right to do so. A genocide is also bad, but not a rulebreak. I'm not being biased. he lost Norway, Finland, his entire army, the baltics and denmark. AND he is being attacked by two other nations. Just let him have it, otherwise he may as well give up. You already won. Imagine if you attacked me, and I defeated you and did that
If I lost, I wouldnt have made a big deal out of it. I would’ve said “oh I lost, good game,” then I would’ve moved on with my life because it’s just a game
…it’s silly time……….:3

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch