Really? Damn.Pablo22510 wrote:
Copycat! I posted it before you.

I love a good meme, I also love poking fun at Politic's. So I decided I'd share some I made for fun.




Please log in to post a reply.
Really? Damn.Pablo22510 wrote:
Copycat! I posted it before you.



OOPS!!!!Quasi-duck wrote:
Oh my God, that is not the Wiemar Republic.....Diabolical wrote:
The Weimar Republic was not a nice little nation. Several of my great-grandparents fled Austria and Germany because of the warpath that the Kaiser was on. That "nice" little nation was looking for an imperial excuse to go to war when it was handed to them on a platter with the assassination of their close ally's Prince Ferdinand.The Wiemar Republic was Germany post WWI, with no Kaiser in sight.
I had a bad glitch in my long-term memory systems. I shall have to have a word with my primary programmer about that.
Actually, I knew that fact at some point in the past. But somewhere along the way, I guess I got the Wiemar Republic confused with the old German Empire. It was the German Empire that my ancestors were fleeing from ... but it was the Kaiser they didn't want to serve under.
So, while I may have been in error on that one fact, the essence of what I said was still true.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.You said that it was an empirical nation that went to war, how is that at all true about the Weimar Republic? They had an army of 100,000 men with no tanks or air force and a tiny navy.....Diabolical wrote:
So, while I may have been in error on that one fact, the essence of what I said was still true.
...and then Hitler happened.Quasi-duck wrote:
You said that it was an empirical nation that went to war, how is that at all true about the Weimar Republic? They had an army of 100,000 men with no tanks or air force and a tiny navy.....Diabolical wrote:
So, while I may have been in error on that one fact, the essence of what I said was still true.
That wasn't the Wiemar Republic anymore though. Democracy was all gone out the window, as it was a one party state, on top of the Versailles Treaty being torn apart article by article.GreatbigHippo wrote:
...and then Hitler happened.
You do realize that Hitler was a member of the Socialist party...like Bernie Sanders, right?GreatbigHippo wrote:
...and then Hitler happened.Quasi-duck wrote:
You said that it was an empirical nation that went to war, how is that at all true about the Weimar Republic? They had an army of 100,000 men with no tanks or air force and a tiny navy.....Diabolical wrote:
So, while I may have been in error on that one fact, the essence of what I said was still true.
And the one fact I was in error of was only the name of the nation, not the government. I knew all about the fall of the German government at the end of the Great War.
And I know also how the new government was manipulated by Hitler and his compatriots. His biggest enemies were not the Jews. His biggest enemies were the communists. He had them unempowered, imprisoned, banashed, and even killed. Later, he needed someone else to pick on, so he chose the Jews since he was such a vile racist. That rallied his fanatical followers to join him in "cleansing" the fatherland.
Had he viewed Germany as a motherland instead, Hitler might not have been so mean to everybody.
If only little Adolf had been a momma's boy. History would have turned out much differently.
Everyone reading this: Go call your momma and tell her you love her.
It seemed like such a waste to destroy an entire battle station just to eliminate one man. But Charlie knew that it was the only way to ensure the absolute and total destruction of Quasi-duck, once and for all.@Diabolical, you do realize there's a difference between socialist an national socialist, right? National socialist have both leftist and far right ideas.
GreatbigHippo wrote:
@Diabolical, you do realize there's a difference between socialist an national socialist, right? National socialist have both leftist and far right ideas.

Err, you do know that Hitler was a mothers boy?Diabolical wrote:
If only little Adolf had been a momma's boy. History would have turned out much differently.

I need an endless loop of this.Defous wrote:
In a communist world..Quasi-duck wrote:
you think Kim jung un eats the same, as the poorest people in North Korea?
Communism, just sounds great, but hate it, love it, dispise it, Right wing ideas work, and dont fail.
Conservatism all the way!
Libertarians, I like ye too!

Oh, oh my, you sure got me here.oceanhawk wrote:
In a communist world..you think Kim jung un eats the same, as the poorest people in North Korea?
Communism, just sounds great, but hate it, love it, dispise it, Right wing ideas work, and dont fail.
Conservatism all the way!
Libertarians, I like ye too!
Y'know, I never knew Michael D. Higgins ate the same as the homeless man down the road..... nothing!
No he doesnt, but this is a centralist democracyQuasi-duck wrote:
Oh, oh my, you sure got me here.oceanhawk wrote:
In a communist world..you think Kim jung un eats the same, as the poorest people in North Korea?
Communism, just sounds great, but hate it, love it, dispise it, Right wing ideas work, and dont fail.
Conservatism all the way!
Libertarians, I like ye too!
Y'know, I never knew Michael D. Higgins ate the same as the homeless man down the road..... nothing!
that is a communist dictatorship
they are meant to all be equal.. but my point is, nobody there eats, and kim jun un whatever, eats just better than the homless people.
haha, nobody in north korea has food, those who do get them through private markets.
you think there are more homeless people here than there? THE GOVERNMENT DOESNT DO ANYTHING AS WELL OR AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR OF THE ECONOMY!
Im getting really fed up of commies and socailists, mainly cos its stupid, and none of them have any valid points

So, uh, how many private companies have led the fight against homelessness then?oceanhawk wrote:
No he doesnt, but this is a centralist democracythat is a communist dictatorship
they are meant to all be equal.. but my point is, nobody there eats, and kim jun un whatever, eats just better than the homless people.
haha, nobody in north korea has food, those who do get them through private markets.
you think there are more homeless people here than there? THE GOVERNMENT DOESNT DO ANYTHING AS WELL OR AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR OF THE ECONOMY!
Im getting really fed up of commies and socailists, mainly cos its stupid, and none of them have any valid points
Not as much as private companies, as private charities..Quasi-duck wrote:
So, uh, how many private companies have led the fight against homelessness then?oceanhawk wrote:
No he doesnt, but this is a centralist democracythat is a communist dictatorship
they are meant to all be equal.. but my point is, nobody there eats, and kim jun un whatever, eats just better than the homless people.
haha, nobody in north korea has food, those who do get them through private markets.
you think there are more homeless people here than there? THE GOVERNMENT DOESNT DO ANYTHING AS WELL OR AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR OF THE ECONOMY!
Im getting really fed up of commies and socailists, mainly cos its stupid, and none of them have any valid points
just may I remind you, that a lot of private companies, also help homeless people, usually small restaurants and bakeries, they bake everything fresh every morning, and hence give out the food not sold, at the end of the business day. Its done a lot here in Dublin.
So you think the government always makes the right choice...

There is still homelessness.oceanhawk wrote:
Not as much as private companies, as private charities..just may I remind you, that a lot of private companies, also help homeless people, usually small restaurants and bakeries, they bake everything fresh every morning, and hence give out the food not sold, at the end of the business day. Its done a lot here in Dublin.
Where did I say that? Make me the dictator, and things will go a lot better! Just build shelters for the homeless, somewhere to stay dry, y'know? Then remove laws making rec drugs illegal so they won't be breaking laws as they trade drugs there during the night.oceanhawk wrote:
So you think the government always makes the right choice...
Please log in to post a reply.