Supremacy 1991?

Yep. What fun is smoking pot when you can't tell your friends that you broke a law?

Portugal's such a troll.

In 1971, when Nixon passed the law that made it illegal to consume drugs, drug usage skyrocketed, as did deaths caused by drugs.

Pablo22510 wrote:

In 1971, when Nixon passed the law that made it illegal to consume drugs, drug usage skyrocketed, as did deaths caused by drugs.

So the world should legalize drugs and activists are making it worse by saying they should be banned.

Yes, but ban smoking(lol).

Butter Ball Bill wrote:

Thanks for proving my point Pablo!

So, are we uniting Africa or SA first?

SA

SA

Alright, what's after that? We will need a lot of power before we go after nuclear countries. What are the tactics anyway? War is not a viable option, there is just too many repercussions.

Hearts and minds of high up places, everyone likes to please their wives and women like jewellery and Africa has lots of those.

Lol, yeah, but I think Asia would be better. Lots of resources and generally more stable than Africa, so easier to unify.

Africa wouldn't be much good to us while taking SA.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Lol, yeah, but I think Asia would be better. Lots of resources and generally more stable than Africa, so easier to unify.

Asia has child labourers who can manufacture of instruments of persuasion for a bowl of rice and a pair of shoes in payment.

Dude, WTF? Child labour is sick. 12+ only and that is for light work on the holidays. This isn't the industrial revolution.

It was a joke about Asia's lack over industrialisation and poor working standards. I wasn't seriously suggesting we take 4 year old Malaysian and make them build weapons for rice and shoes.

Errrr, dudes, Asia is the next target in my opinion. More resources than Africa and more industrially advanced, and it also plays a huge part in modern politics.

We've decided that I think. Why control Africa when you have China itself. Asia is also a big technology giant on the forefront of electrical gadgetery.