As most of us know the Soviet union ceased to exist in 1991, fairly peacefully. What if, however the reds felt like invading us capitalist pigs and starting ww3? I wanted to know if anyone would like to see a ww3 version of this game with all the features and cool stuff.
Please log in to post a reply.
In this game the nuclear fallout means the province morale doesn't increase from 20 or so for 60 days, we could apply the same for S1991.
I mean like spreading to other countries that weren't involved in the initial exchange. You know, just to balance things out and to add some realism. So say, Malta doesn't take over the world. (ok fine, not Malta but you get what i mean)
And i feel like 1983 would be better, as that is when a resurgence in Cold War hostilities happened. Everyone seems to want this to be a nuke centered game, so how about we make manpower got down a lot, and decline after the nukes fall. You can build say, fallout shelters/bunkers to keep yourself from losing as much, and food storage and such. If you want WW3, LETS MAKE IT GOOD
WW3.
1950-1991
Buildings.
Infrastructure 1-3
Industrial complexes 1-5
naval bases 1-3
airbases 1-3
fallout shelters
fortifications 1-5
nuclear reactor
space rocket/satellite launch centre?
Nuclear warning/sirens?
Space station?
Newer features for more modern technology.
Longer nuclear missile range?
Civilian death-count alongside military dead?
Nuclear submarines that fire nuclear missiles?
Nuclear warning siren?
fallout shelters?
Etc
New units.
Nuclear missile firing submarines?
Helicopters?
ICBMs?
Space satellites?
Nuclear powered aircraft carriers?
AWACs?
I take it you mean the mushroom cloud effect? The blast creates a shroud over the earth which spreads and sets in nuclear winter over vast swathes of the Earth?lasthope556 wrote:
I mean like spreading to other countries that weren't involved in the initial exchange. You know, just to balance things out and to add some realism. So say, Malta doesn't take over the world. (ok fine, not Malta but you get what i mean)
*Presses nuclear bomb button repeatedly* Are you trying to tell me this isn't the button for coffee???
Yes, i do mean that. Nuclear winter that makes food production and manpower go down and morale goes down a bit. By a bit i mean to about 40% and the food shortages cause rioting etc, so you need all of your troops (that probably have low morale also) at your provinces to keep order. This would also be an optional feature that you can toggle at game creation, because no, not everyone will like this.
People will probably find it similar to a province that is recently captured, or in s1914 provinces rebel if they're morale reaches a lowpoint because of a lack of several resources.
That's what i meant it as, except it would occur nationally.
What if in this game, instead of building up your country and trying to produce more resources and troops, everything is already built up to the max and you have to try to destroy the other player's economy with strategically placed nukes?
Also you could limit trades and production to prevent other people from building nuclear weapons. It would be more about economic warfare, but I think it could still work as a Call of War style game.
That sounds really good. I still want conventional warfare though.
Of course. I think it would be a great feature to have to use up your armies and invade quickly so they actually get a use before they die of radiation.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
That sounds really good. I still want conventional warfare though.
Lol, what about nuke proof tanks?
Sounds impressive and useful!
Yep. Now we can nuke without worrying for our men.
Maybe if it was like Men of War assault squad,
Capture a certain point then get a certain unit
E.g Merica get USSR Berlin then Merica gets Full heavy tanks to produce and so forth
No, I don't like that. Why would a country not give themselves an advantage until they captured a certain area? I know why they do it in MoW but it wouldn't make sense in something like this.
I like a mix of conventional warfare and economical destruction. I have seen many times players grouping huge armies together into one unit. Makes it a lot easier for me nukes. 
Player one creates a new game. Ah, lets select the US this time. Ok, fire ICBM's, get the bombers in the air. Subs in reserve.
Wait...wait...ok, rest of the world is obliterated.
Hmm, its getting dark. Morale in all my provinces is dropping. Rebellion? Now I know what the conventional troops are for.
Player two logs on. I'll pick France. No industry, little left of the army, few people and not really happy ones. But we still have our subs. Player one is US? Oh, I'll get him. 10 SSBN's x16 SLBM's x6 MIRV's = lots of opportunity to get even. Eat that!
Game over.
That was fun, lets do it again!
I think late Cold War Era (1980-1989) would be better than 1991, but that's only my opinion.
Please log in to post a reply.
