As most of us know the Soviet union ceased to exist in 1991, fairly peacefully. What if, however the reds felt like invading us capitalist pigs and starting ww3? I wanted to know if anyone would like to see a ww3 version of this game with all the features and cool stuff.
Please log in to post a reply.
All I know is that you are quite the odd bod. Tea is after dinner and before tiffin. Is that what you had? If not, go learn about meals.
Breakfast is the first main meal, lunch is what you have midday and tea is the final main meal supper is a light snack before bed, ditto.
Geez, I would hate to be you. Where are all the snacks?! The multiple lunches? The times for drinks only! My God, what has the world come to!?
I was outlining the bare bones of my meal structure.Of course I have snacks between meals, I even bought a kettle and minfridge for my classroom so I could have a cup of tea during lessons.
We in Spain are different.
That still falls sorely below my standards. I just had dinner and all this chatter about food has made me hungry. I'm off to eat. Best part is, I can't gain much weight no matter how much I eat unless I have a massive breakfast with two dinners and two lunches a day for about month with plenty of snacks!
Lol, I can't gain any weight either. No matter how much I eat.
What did I just read?Felipe V de Borbon. wrote:
I do not like the fictional maps, and Supremacy 1991 no would have historical context.
I'm spanish, I learning english, my english is not perfect.comrade dave wrote:
What did I just read?Felipe V de Borbon. wrote:
I do not like the fictional maps, and Supremacy 1991 no would have historical context.
that aside, I'm sure you've heard of the cold war.
You have just insulted Dave.
Acabas de decir que lo que ha dicho Dave a lo largo de 22 páginas es mentira. Retira eso antes de que te empalen a insultos.
Hipster is too mainstream for me.GeneralPhara wrote:
Missiles crossing continents would be too mainstream....but fun!
What stops people from nuking the sh*t out of each other on day 1?comrade dave wrote:
Missile's crossing continents would be OP asf, but this is the cold war
When you come up with a solution to that problem, remember nobody will ever attack somebody else, because they know they'll just get nuked.
You can't limit the amount of nukes too much, because each side in the cold war had thousands of nukes at their disposal, and if people can't have that, in unrealistic.
What style?comrade dave wrote:
Stop crampin' our style bro'
That right is reserved for 'mericans!Butter Ball Bill wrote:
I mean, in real life, my name is Butter Ball Bill and I weigh 10 tonnes and living in a rectangular house made of metallic foil.
This is another game, with completely different mechanics and everything, so it could be done.Pablo22510 wrote:
Another possible map is Red Army Afghanistan, although now that I think about it, it was mainly guerrillas fighting the Soviets, so not easy to recreate,
Yes. It needs a leader that is experienced in leading. Someone whose online initials mean Grievous Bodily HarmButter Ball Bill wrote:
Hmm, well, I think a world wide revolution is needed. With a dictator at it's head. A new monarchy, anyone? Could work well.
Me and MeButter Ball Bill wrote:
Anyone have better combo's?
Africa has potential. You have the resources, the manpower (it's an entire continent) and nobody cares what you do there, especially if it means improving the regional economy and stuff. It wouldn't be too hard to gain control of compared to more stable parts of the world.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
So, what continent would be first on the list? Africa could do with a good uniting and it is brimming with resources.
It's not always that simple. If the cartel is more powerful than the government they won't let drugs be legal if it's not in their best interests. You can't just send the army to stop them either. Mexico tried that. 100,000 people died, and they lost.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Cartels are easy. Do what Portugal did and decriminalize drugs.
Of course they have. Drugs aren't a crime anymoreButter Ball Bill wrote:
Drug crime rates...have fallen a lot.
Democracy is their greatest weakness. Get your own agents elected into high up government and military positions, then have them seriously abuse their power. Then, you start a pro-you revolution.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Alright, what's after that? We will need a lot of power before we go after nuclear countries. What are the tactics anyway? War is not a viable option, there is just too many repercussions.
As for china, gain control of every other country, then ban all trade with them.
Try using flame tanks and juggernaut suits. See what the coked up monkeys do then...GreatbigHippo wrote:
It's not always that simple. If the cartel is more powerful than the government they won't let drugs be legal if it's not in their best interests. You can't just send the army to stop them either. Mexico tried that. 100,000 people died, and they lost.
The only way to beat the cartels is legalizing drugs. In 1971 POTUS Nixon passed a law making all drugs illegal (more or less). Deaths caused by drugs skyrocketed, as did crimes and cartel profits.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Try using flame tanks and juggernaut suits. See what the coked up monkeys do then...
We know, we discussed this...Pablo22510 wrote:
The only way to beat the cartels is legalizing drugs. In 1971 POTUS Nixon passed a law making all drugs illegal (more or less). Deaths caused by drugs skyrocketed, as did crimes and cartel profits.
Ok, so no need for flame tanks and juggernauts.
It is to beat the cartels armies.
No need to beat them if you legalise drugs.
Were you not reading? The Mexican army lost 100k men because they tried to fight the cartels who make money due to drugs being illegal.
Ok, so legalize drugs, so you don't have to fight them...
Please log in to post a reply.
