Supremacy 1991?

As most of us know the Soviet union ceased to exist in 1991, fairly peacefully. What if, however the reds felt like invading us capitalist pigs and starting ww3? I wanted to know if anyone would like to see a ww3 version of this game with all the features and cool stuff.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

495 Replies

We can focus on areas of actual conflict so there could be a Israeli-arab based map, a Asian map focusing on the Korean war and Vietnam, obviously Europe and almost certainly a world map or one that contains Europe and North America. We would have to make Nuclear weapons much more expensive to produce and research to counterbalance the fact nukes could cross continents.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Korea war would be funny but this is call of war 1942

this would be a new a game or a special mode

again this is a good idea but I think for Devs they need more info about how,when,what,who,why

Will it run with current ideas eg level 2 tank Sherman or level 2 Pershing ?

Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning Erwin Rommel
Meep Meep Meep Morke
Forum Gang Best website in the world

A new game is best. The main conflicts should be Korea, 'Nam and then the ME with a fictional 'what if' world wide match.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Agreed, we should pretty much retain the UI and tech tree but update it with more appropriate upgrades to fit the timespan.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

comrade dave wrote:

Agreed, we should pretty much retain the UI and tech tree but update it with more appropriate upgrades to fit the timespan.
Ok that sounds good but one quick question if Korea was one what would north get i know south would get America but South and china ?
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning Erwin Rommel
Meep Meep Meep Morke
Forum Gang Best website in the world

Teams.

South Korea and U.S.A Using Japan's country as it's land because of the presence after the war the US put in Japan.

North Korea and the Southern part of China.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

What about 'Nam? Would we have Laos and Cambodia too?

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Again.

North Vietnam and China

South Vietnam and US using South Korea as it's land.

Laos and Cambodia could be AI nations with only a bit of each country being visible.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Sounds good.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

I have my uses.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Yes, you do. Some are, uh, disturbing though.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

*Thrusts Crotch

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

comrade dave wrote:

*Thrusts Crotch
Lol WTF?
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

You said I had other uses, I demonstrated. Don't worry Bill I won't leave out the Biscuit ;)

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

Ew, please do!

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Let's stop actually I find it uncomfortable for myselft now.

British=best. Duh!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk

That sounds good to me.

Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!

Another possible map is Red Army Afghanistan, although now that I think about it, it was mainly guerrillas fighting the Soviets, so not easy to recreate,

The past is a foreign country.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch