Locked

What was the best army in WW2? II.

What was the best army in WW2?

The Red Army:

The British Army:

The USA Army:

The Japonese Army:

[/img]

The Germany Army, "The Wehrmacht"

[/img]

This is a debate.

Rules of the debate:

-Will have to provide information from by that you think that your choice is the best army.

-You shall respect the forum rules.


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

432 Replies

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

if you think the USSR didn't lose the Cold War,
Look, what I'm trying to say is, you can't win if you never fought or came into contact. By this logic, I beat you up.
Dude, the Cold War was won by the USA. Proof of it was that of the two main belligerents, the USSR and the USA, only one survived.
Look, you can't call an arms race a proper war.
I never did, but you said that the USSR didn't lose the Cold War, and it did.
Straight from the US of A: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2010/01/22/why-neither-reagan-nor-the-united-states-won-the-cold-war-2
What that article says is that no one won the Cold War, because the USSR willingly dissolved into Russia. Yes and no. Gorbachev obviously pushed the process through, but it was mainly the fact that the Soviet economy couldn't keep up the its American counterpart.

But now we have Russia, who emerged from the ashes of the USSR, who is as bad as the USSR.

Russia is only bad for the westerners who are zombified by all propganada that is being spoon fed to them/

Just look at recent events.

Georgia in 2008, on the day of the ceremony of the Olympic games in China, which were originally meant to stop wars and promote peace, Georgia fired on Russian peacekeeping post in South Osetia, killing russian soldiers, and invaded South Osetia and Abkhazia. By next day Russian military intervened and pushed Georgian army out of Abkhazia and Osetia. Even pushed into Georgia. They could have taken the Capital and hang Georgian president for war crimes, but they stopped. Remember what was written and said in every news source in the West????? " "Russia attacked Georgia" . " RUssians are coming" " Putin is the new HItler" and etc.... it took months , if not years, for international community to look at all the evidence, after which it was recognized that Georgia was the AGGRESSOR.

Same thing is happening in Ukraine since 2014, when nazi junta took over the legitimately elected gov't and declared war on everything Russian, thus making the mostly Russian populated regions to rise and break away from Ukraine, after which Ukraine sent an Army against their own citizens ( they did not recognize the splitting regions ).

All the news channels are still screaming that Russia is the aggressor !!!

What is really bad is Western imperialism and corporate interests that control the western governments. It is all about profit and power.

Quasi-duck wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

who is as bad as the USSR.
Hardly. If you mean Syria, they are the only country that was actually invited by the government to fight there.
exactly right, along with Iran.

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

A government that has forced the displacement of millions of people, and killed hundreds of thousands. Quoting from my grandad's Syrian friend Fabuan, who lives in Syria, "IS are the least of our worries. It's Assad that we are scared of."
Assad should be overthrown, and create a free and democratic election led by NATO
Like Iraq? Libya? Afganistan?

what democratic and free do you see here ? if you yourself say that it should be led by NATO !!:)))

a ridiculous statement.

The way I see it, you think if NATO controls the gov't , it must be democratic and free:))))) hahahaha

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

A government that has forced the displacement of millions of people, and killed hundreds of thousands. Quoting from my grandad's Syrian friend Fabuan, who lives in Syria, "IS are the least of our worries. It's Assad that we are scared of."
Assad should be overthrown, and create a free and democratic election led by NATO
Just saw this..

I'm pro-Assad as I believe he is superior to the "moderate rebels". If Assad was defeated, Syria would be Libya 2.0. The rebels in reality aren't moderate in anyway, their beliefs are just as radical as ISIS, Syria would go down a bad, bad route.

MihailMD wrote:

Russia is only bad for the westerners who are zombified by all propganada that is being spoon fed to them/

Just look at recent events.

Georgia in 2008, on the day of the ceremony of the Olympic games in China, which were originally meant to stop wars and promote peace, Georgia fired on Russian peacekeeping post in South Osetia, killing russian soldiers, and invaded South Osetia and Abkhazia. By next day Russian military intervened and pushed Georgian army out of Abkhazia and Osetia. Even pushed into Georgia. They could have taken the Capital and hang Georgian president for war crimes, but they stopped. Remember what was written and said in every news source in the West????? " "Russia attacked Georgia" . " RUssians are coming" " Putin is the new HItler" and etc.... it took months , if not years, for international community to look at all the evidence, after which it was recognized that Georgia was the AGGRESSOR.

Same thing is happening in Ukraine since 2014, when nazi junta took over the legitimately elected gov't and declared war on everything Russian, thus making the mostly Russian populated regions to rise and break away from Ukraine, after which Ukraine sent an Army against their own citizens ( they did not recognize the splitting regions ).

All the news channels are still screaming that Russia is the aggressor !!!

What is really bad is Western imperialism and corporate interests that control the western governments. It is all about profit and power.

  1. Need I mention the brutalities committed by Russians during Afghanistan, Chechen Wars, WW2, etc.? And if that was enough, to quote you, "just look at recent events." Russia has been openly supporting a regime that thas hilled hundreds of thousands in nerve gas attacks and with barrel bombs.
  2. And YOU, my friend, have been brainwashed by Russian propaganda. In Spain, two of the most important parties are self-funded, and are playing a key part in the country's politics. Many right-wing groups in the northern countries are also funded throurgh crowdfunding, and they are gaining a lot of support. We have a saying here in Spain: "No hay más ciego que el que no quiere ver." Roughly translated it means "The only blind people are those who don't want to see."
  3. Finally, please don't just assume that ALL of us think bulldust like "Putin is the new Hitler." 'Cos we don't. That is product of media like Fox News, but 75% of Westerners don't think Putin is the new Hitler, and 15% actually like him. I'm in the 75%, but I still think he's a bastard.
The past is a foreign country.

Not A Communist wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

A government that has forced the displacement of millions of people, and killed hundreds of thousands. Quoting from my grandad's Syrian friend Fabuan, who lives in Syria, "IS are the least of our worries. It's Assad that we are scared of."
Assad should be overthrown, and create a free and democratic election led by NATO
Just saw this..I'm pro-Assad as I believe he is superior to the "moderate rebels". If Assad was defeated, Syria would be Libya 2.0. The rebels in reality aren't moderate in anyway, their beliefs are just as radical as ISIS, Syria would go down a bad, bad route.
I agree. Assad keeps the country under control with ruthlessness, but he keeps it under control. However, we cannot pretend that's he's a nice person, and once IS is finished, he will have to be overthrown.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

Russians during Afghanistan, Chechen Wars, WW2, etc.?
Have you heard of Agent Orange or Operation Rolling Thunder? Both cause problems to this day for Vietnam, just like Allied bombing in Germany during WWII. The only "problem" for Afghanistan as a result of the Soviets supporting a democratically selected government is that the Afghan's have a load of Soviet gear.

Pablo22510 wrote:

MihailMD wrote:

Same thing is happening in Ukraine since 2014, when nazi junta took over the legitimately elected gov't and declared war on everything Russian, thus making the mostly Russian populated regions to rise and break away from Ukraine, after which Ukraine sent an Army against their own citizens ( they did not recognize the splitting regions ).

All the news channels are still screaming that Russia is the aggressor !!!

  1. Finally, please don't just assume that ALL of us think bulldust like "Putin is the new Hitler." 'Cos we don't. That is product of media like Fox News, but 75% of Westerners don't think Putin is the new Hitler, and 15% actually like him. I'm in the 75%, but I still think he's a bastard.
Being a Ukrainian i completely disagree our country is wanting to be a capatalist nation and at the moment is driven by Nationalism NOT NAZISM!! I am Pro-EU and a Serzhant in the Ukrainia Armed Forces i have seen the front and battled there for over a year and a half... as for sending an army against our own civilians they are TERRORISTS... they want to be Russian? Move to Russia. UKRAINIA IS UKRAINIA!! The Russian army is IN Ukrainia and want the proof? Visit some military cemertrys in Somara... Also come to Ukrainia and visit Mariupol, we have plenty of POWs if you need the proof that Vladimir Putin is a arsehole and needs eradicating before causing more crap towards us. When Russia leaves Ukrainia we will stop calling them aggressors.

EDIT: I have nothing against Russian people as a whole just the intelligence levels of the fact that Putin is trying to rebuild USSR and most Eastern Europeans dont want to be Soviet again...


Джаред Михайлович Ніколюк 9

MihailMD wrote:

Like Iraq? Libya? Afganistan?

what democratic and free do you see here ? if you yourself say that it should be led by NATO !!:)))

a ridiculous statement.

The way I see it, you think if NATO controls the gov't , it must be democratic and free:)

What you propose? What these Nations remain dictatorships? What these Nations are led by leading extremists with expansionist intentions?

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Dictatorship is a subjective term and it is widely used for "not pro-western". I don't think that life in Libya, Iraq, Egypt or some similar countries is better now compared to how it was during the rule of those "dictators".

Not A Communist wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

A government that has forced the displacement of millions of people, and killed hundreds of thousands. Quoting from my grandad's Syrian friend Fabuan, who lives in Syria, "IS are the least of our worries. It's Assad that we are scared of."
Assad should be overthrown, and create a free and democratic election led by NATO
Just saw this..I'm pro-Assad as I believe he is superior to the "moderate rebels". If Assad was defeated, Syria would be Libya 2.0. The rebels in reality aren't moderate in anyway, their beliefs are just as radical as ISIS, Syria would go down a bad, bad route.
Same here, 100% right

Pablo22510 wrote:

MihailMD wrote:

Russia is only bad for the westerners who are zombified by all propganada that is being spoon fed to them/

Just look at recent events.

Georgia in 2008, on the day of the ceremony of the Olympic games in China, which were originally meant to stop wars and promote peace, Georgia fired on Russian peacekeeping post in South Osetia, killing russian soldiers, and invaded South Osetia and Abkhazia. By next day Russian military intervened and pushed Georgian army out of Abkhazia and Osetia. Even pushed into Georgia. They could have taken the Capital and hang Georgian president for war crimes, but they stopped. Remember what was written and said in every news source in the West????? " "Russia attacked Georgia" . " RUssians are coming" " Putin is the new HItler" and etc.... it took months , if not years, for international community to look at all the evidence, after which it was recognized that Georgia was the AGGRESSOR.

Same thing is happening in Ukraine since 2014, when nazi junta took over the legitimately elected gov't and declared war on everything Russian, thus making the mostly Russian populated regions to rise and break away from Ukraine, after which Ukraine sent an Army against their own citizens ( they did not recognize the splitting regions ).

All the news channels are still screaming that Russia is the aggressor !!!

What is really bad is Western imperialism and corporate interests that control the western governments. It is all about profit and power.

  1. Need I mention the brutalities committed by Russians during Afghanistan, Chechen Wars, WW2, etc.? And if that was enough, to quote you, "just look at recent events." Russia has been openly supporting a regime that thas hilled hundreds of thousands in nerve gas attacks and with barrel bombs.
  2. And YOU, my friend, have been brainwashed by Russian propaganda. In Spain, two of the most important parties are self-funded, and are playing a key part in the country's politics. Many right-wing groups in the northern countries are also funded throurgh crowdfunding, and they are gaining a lot of support. We have a saying here in Spain: "No hay más ciego que el que no quiere ver." Roughly translated it means "The only blind people are those who don't want to see."
  3. Finally, please don't just assume that ALL of us think bulldust like "Putin is the new Hitler." 'Cos we don't. That is product of media like Fox News, but 75% of Westerners don't think Putin is the new Hitler, and 15% actually like him. I'm in the 75%, but I still think he's a bastard.
1) it has not been proven that it was Assad that used the gas, there are many facts that point to ISIS and/or rebels have done it, to set up Assad. I really incline to believe that Assad is innocent in this case. Watch his interview online, he is asked on the subject by Western journalist, and he responded in detail how things went down.

So , do not believe everything you hear or read from your bought up news sources.

2) I read both , Western media and Russian. Both use propaganda, but somethings are quite easy to put together yourself even if one has half of brain, So you should definitely be able to do so. Do you read or watch Russina news media sources? I doubt it...

3) I did not say that all people in the west are saying Putin is new Hitler, I said Western Media is trying very hard to portray him as one. At least you can see through this, it is a good beginning. I am also not saying he is an angel, all politicians are bastards by definition, also whores... as Vast majority of them work for people who invested in them to become a career politician. With Putin, I believe he was samrt enough to shake such people off his back at some point, unlike ALL western leaders

Paramunac wrote:

Dictatorship is a subjective term and it is widely used for "not pro-western". I don't think that life in Libya, Iraq, Egypt or some similar countries is better now compared to how it was during the rule of those "dictators".
much more peaceful and people have not realized how happy they were comparing to now, after the Democracy came knocking ))

UA Dzharet wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

MihailMD wrote:

Same thing is happening in Ukraine since 2014, when nazi junta took over the legitimately elected gov't and declared war on everything Russian, thus making the mostly Russian populated regions to rise and break away from Ukraine, after which Ukraine sent an Army against their own citizens ( they did not recognize the splitting regions ).

All the news channels are still screaming that Russia is the aggressor !!!

  1. Finally, please don't just assume that ALL of us think bulldust like "Putin is the new Hitler." 'Cos we don't. That is product of media like Fox News, but 75% of Westerners don't think Putin is the new Hitler, and 15% actually like him. I'm in the 75%, but I still think he's a bastard.
Being a Ukrainian i completely disagree our country is wanting to be a capatalist nation and at the moment is driven by Nationalism NOT NAZISM!! I am Pro-EU and a Serzhant in the Ukrainia Armed Forces i have seen the front and battled there for over a year and a half... as for sending an army against our own civilians they are TERRORISTS... they want to be Russian? Move to Russia. UKRAINIA IS UKRAINIA!! The Russian army is IN Ukrainia and want the proof? Visit some military cemertrys in Somara... Also come to Ukrainia and visit Mariupol, we have plenty of POWs if you need the proof that Vladimir Putin is a arsehole and needs eradicating before causing more crap towards us. When Russia leaves Ukrainia we will stop calling them aggressors.

EDIT: I have nothing against Russian people as a whole just the intelligence levels of the fact that Putin is trying to rebuild USSR and most Eastern Europeans dont want to be Soviet again...

Apparently you are completely brainwashed , a perfect puppet of the West and nazi Junta that took over Ukraine BY FORCE, to the point that you agreed to go fight people ( NOT TERRORISTS) who are ( were ) also citizens of your country, who just yesterday payed taxes, sent their children to school and just wanted to live in Peace in Democratic Ukraine. But could not do it anymore, after the gov't ( even though it was very corrupt ) was overthrown in a violent coup and their rights have been taken away the very next day.

You and the Junta are real TERRORISTS in this instance, and you cannot spin it any way to make it look otherwise.

I doubt very much that you are Ukrainian, as you can't even spell UKRAINA right ( not UKRAINIA), and everyone from that region knows it is SAMARA ( not SOMARA ). I think you are just a troll.

Most Eastern Europeans ( at least over the age of 40 who remember it ) only wish to live again in Soviet Union, but it is not what Putin is trying to rebuild, as he said it himself numerous times. What is the point of starting to feed all of the poor East European countries again, when there are so many people in Russia trying to meet ends meet. What he wants is respect and same rights as any other major country. It is not Russia who has been moving its borders westwards for two decades since the fall of USSR, it is NATO that is moving eastwards and threats Russia by trying to undermine its Nuclear defensive and offensive capabilities.

Can we get back on topic guys? It's what was the best army in WWII. Not how messed up the world is today.

Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton

Who had better armament? Great Britain or Germany? in WWII


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

MihailMD wrote:

Not A Communist wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

A government that has forced the displacement of millions of people, and killed hundreds of thousands. Quoting from my grandad's Syrian friend Fabuan, who lives in Syria, "IS are the least of our worries. It's Assad that we are scared of."
Assad should be overthrown, and create a free and democratic election led by NATO
Just saw this..I'm pro-Assad as I believe he is superior to the "moderate rebels". If Assad was defeated, Syria would be Libya 2.0. The rebels in reality aren't moderate in anyway, their beliefs are just as radical as ISIS, Syria would go down a bad, bad route.
Same here, 100% right

Pablo22510 wrote:

MihailMD wrote:

Russia is only bad for the westerners who are zombified by all propganada that is being spoon fed to them/

Just look at recent events.

Georgia in 2008, on the day of the ceremony of the Olympic games in China, which were originally meant to stop wars and promote peace, Georgia fired on Russian peacekeeping post in South Osetia, killing russian soldiers, and invaded South Osetia and Abkhazia. By next day Russian military intervened and pushed Georgian army out of Abkhazia and Osetia. Even pushed into Georgia. They could have taken the Capital and hang Georgian president for war crimes, but they stopped. Remember what was written and said in every news source in the West????? " "Russia attacked Georgia" . " RUssians are coming" " Putin is the new HItler" and etc.... it took months , if not years, for international community to look at all the evidence, after which it was recognized that Georgia was the AGGRESSOR.

Same thing is happening in Ukraine since 2014, when nazi junta took over the legitimately elected gov't and declared war on everything Russian, thus making the mostly Russian populated regions to rise and break away from Ukraine, after which Ukraine sent an Army against their own citizens ( they did not recognize the splitting regions ).

All the news channels are still screaming that Russia is the aggressor !!!

What is really bad is Western imperialism and corporate interests that control the western governments. It is all about profit and power.

  1. Need I mention the brutalities committed by Russians during Afghanistan, Chechen Wars, WW2, etc.? And if that was enough, to quote you, "just look at recent events." Russia has been openly supporting a regime that thas hilled hundreds of thousands in nerve gas attacks and with barrel bombs.
  2. And YOU, my friend, have been brainwashed by Russian propaganda. In Spain, two of the most important parties are self-funded, and are playing a key part in the country's politics. Many right-wing groups in the northern countries are also funded throurgh crowdfunding, and they are gaining a lot of support. We have a saying here in Spain: "No hay más ciego que el que no quiere ver." Roughly translated it means "The only blind people are those who don't want to see."
  3. Finally, please don't just assume that ALL of us think bulldust like "Putin is the new Hitler." 'Cos we don't. That is product of media like Fox News, but 75% of Westerners don't think Putin is the new Hitler, and 15% actually like him. I'm in the 75%, but I still think he's a bastard.
1) it has not been proven that it was Assad that used the gas, there are many facts that point to ISIS and/or rebels have done it, to set up Assad. I really incline to believe that Assad is innocent in this case. Watch his interview online, he is asked on the subject by Western journalist, and he responded in detail how things went down.So , do not believe everything you hear or read from your bought up news sources.

2) I read both , Western media and Russian. Both use propaganda, but somethings are quite easy to put together yourself even if one has half of brain, So you should definitely be able to do so. Do you read or watch Russina news media sources? I doubt it...

3) I did not say that all people in the west are saying Putin is new Hitler, I said Western Media is trying very hard to portray him as one. At least you can see through this, it is a good beginning. I am also not saying he is an angel, all politicians are bastards by definition, also whores... as Vast majority of them work for people who invested in them to become a career politician. With Putin, I believe he was samrt enough to shake such people off his back at some point, unlike ALL western leaders

Paramunac wrote:

Dictatorship is a subjective term and it is widely used for "not pro-western". I don't think that life in Libya, Iraq, Egypt or some similar countries is better now compared to how it was during the rule of those "dictators".
much more peaceful and people have not realized how happy they were comparing to now, after the Democracy came knocking ))
I have friends in Syria who say that Assad is 10 times worse than IS. And how do you explain this:

http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/09/why-are-russian-engineers-working-at-an-islamic-state-controlled-gas-plant-in-syria/

The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

I have friends in Syria who say that Assad is 10 times worse than IS. And how do you explain this:http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/09/why-are-russian-engineers-working-at-an-islamic-state-controlled-gas-plant-in-syria/
in such case Your friends are muslim terrorists , as Syria was pretty much the only civil State in the Middle East with tolerance to all religious dogmas.

As far as spreading more Western Propaganda I will tell you this, do not believe everything you read or see . Read above , I gave examples of how wrong Western Media was during the conflicts in Georgia and now in Ukraine.

MihailMD wrote:

Pablo22510 wrote:

I have friends in Syria who say that Assad is 10 times worse than IS. And how do you explain this:http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/09/why-are-russian-engineers-working-at-an-islamic-state-controlled-gas-plant-in-syria/
in such case Your friends are muslim terrorists , as Syria was pretty much the only civil State in the Middle East with tolerance to all religious dogmas.As far as spreading more Western Propaganda I will tell you this, do not believe everything you read or see . Read above , I gave examples of how wrong Western Media was during the conflicts in Georgia and now in Ukraine.
  1. Mate, around 83% of Syria is Sunni, yet Assad is Shiite. He doesn't allow majority Sunnis into his government. 'Religious tolerance'. And my friend isn't a Muslim terrorist. He is an oil exporter, who says that Assad is bad as hell. Do you know what a barrel bomb is?
  2. Ok. Fair enough. You can't believe anything youread either. It's Russian propaganda.
The past is a foreign country.

Pablo22510 wrote:

And my friend isn't a Muslim terrorist. He is an oil exporter, who says that Assad is bad as hell.
Oh, sorry Pablo, I just played an awesome prank on you. By the way I live on the moon and it is made of cheese. The landings are a hoax too.

See how easy it is to lie online?

Calm in the thread!


"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.

Maximilien wrote:

Who had better armament? Great Britain or Germany? in WWII
Best SMG: PPSH-41

Best BAR: Kar 98k

Best MG: Maschinegewehr 42

Best Grenade: M42

Best Tank: Bengal Tiger (Tiger II)

Overall the German armament was crazy :D some insane weaponry


Джаред Михайлович Ніколюк 9

UA Dzharet wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Who had better armament? Great Britain or Germany? in WWII
Best SMG: PPSH-41Best BAR: Kar 98k

Best MG: Maschinegewehr 42

Best Grenade: M42

Best Tank: Bengal Tiger (Tiger II)

Overall the German armament was crazy :D some insane weaponry

Couldnt agree more...

well maybe put the MP 4O Above the PPSH

also PPSH Soviet


If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye

UA Dzharet wrote:

Best SMG: PPSH-41

Best BAR: Kar 98k

Best MG: Maschinegewehr 42

Best Grenade: M42

Best Tank: Bengal Tiger (Tiger II)

BAR stands for Browning Automatic Rifle and the Kar 98K was a semi-auto bolt action rifle. The best tank was not the Tiger II either, it ate fuel and the engine was over strained as well as being unfit for mass production on top of being way too expensive.

The PPSH-41 was a machine pistol, by the way. Same with the MP-40.

Back to Off Topic
Quick Launch