Please read ANY of my previous comments. Of course the US would be at war, but not officially. Understood?nemuritor98_ wrote:
Definitions of war: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/warSo according to what you said, USA constitution(not America because that's not a country at all) says that they can "kill people with love" in another country without getting involved in a war.
Taking this example, imagine Russia send tanks and army to US cities and the US Army fights against them, if your congress does not sign anything, you won't be in war, just playing a bit, is that correct?
Wars of EEUU: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wars_involving_the_United_States
Who do you think is going to win the USA's elections?
SO I just wanted to see the different opinion of other people. Please also state why you think this person is going to win the elections. Remember this is not about who you would like to win the election, but who do you think is going to win the elections. You have to vote to see the results, no cheating
.
-George S. Patton
"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"
- Albert Einstein
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
239 Replies
No.Pablo22510 wrote:
Understood?
What would the US do if this actually happened?Quasi-duck wrote:
I think General Mattis should run.
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
We don't know. Gen. Mattis has not told anyone his political views and has only been a "civilian" for three years in his adult life. He has never even owned a TV.Kehsct wrote:
What would the US do if this actually happened?
At this stage..........Quasi-duck wrote:
No.Pablo22510 wrote:
Understood?
I am not surprised..

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
No.oceanhawk wrote:
At this stage..........I am not surprised..
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
I think she will win...Maximilien wrote:
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.
She will win her nomination (thankfully) and will knock cruz out of the water..
and will prob beat Trump if he gets the nomination ( lets hope he does )

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
It's possible.oceanhawk wrote:
I think she will win...Maximilien wrote:
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.She will win her nomination (thankfully) and will knock cruz out of the water..
and will prob beat Trump if he gets the nomination ( lets hope he does )
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
thats betterMaximilien wrote:
It's possible. maybe,never knowoceanhawk wrote:
I think she will win...She will win her nomination (thankfully) and will knock cruz out of the water..Maximilien wrote:
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.and will prob beat Trump if he gets the nomination ( lets hope he does )
hehe
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
oceanhawk wrote:
thats betterMaximilien wrote:
It's possible. maybe,never knowoceanhawk wrote:
I think she will win...She will win her nomination (thankfully) and will knock cruz out of the water..and will prob beat Trump if he gets the nomination ( lets hope he does )Maximilien wrote:
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.hehe

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
correctMaximilien wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
thats betterMaximilien wrote:
It's possible. maybe,never knowoceanhawk wrote:
I think she will win...She will win her nomination (thankfully) and will knock cruz out of the water..and will prob beat Trump if he gets the nomination ( lets hope he does )Maximilien wrote:
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.hehe
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
oceanhawk wrote:
correctMaximilien wrote:
oceanhawk wrote:
thats betterMaximilien wrote:
It's possible. maybe,never knowoceanhawk wrote:
I think she will win...She will win her nomination (thankfully) and will knock cruz out of the water..and will prob beat Trump if he gets the nomination ( lets hope he does )Maximilien wrote:
The survey gives victory to Hillary Clinton.hehe
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
Ocean, everything you said on the front page was wrong.oceanhawk wrote:
rubio by a land slidedemorcrats have awfull canidates
sanders, a socialist, wo will fail to hold democratic strong points, and will lose swing states
actually rep fisrt
trump wins nomination(doubt it) he will get walked over by clintin, or sanders
easy win for the demcrats
rubio wins nomination=me happy
plus he will take the latino vote, and he is polling well with young voters, california looking red if u ask me....
he will retake the 29iner of florida, and with cruz gone, Id say it will be a tight battle for texas
cant predict that now..
Id say the smarter people in texas will go for rubio, as they know a wall wont work
tight,
arizonia, rubio will take,
Id say rubio and I hope rubio, best candidate,
also for the record, Id rather see trump presisdent than cruz
left side
clitin, hated by party, and party leader
lot of mistakes
bit of a botch
but since the only good dem candade martin o mally, gone Id say shame bout that
and sanders and clintin close
larger support for clintin, plus sanders not very popular
going to be close, but with candadadies like them, Im gonna say that there will be a republician president next year
And I hope and think that it will be marco rubio
like, saders wont hold california, texas, florida, arizonia
rubio will wipe the floor,
sanders will take, Mishigan,maine, NH, vermont, maybe NY, gotta look into details there again
mid west, around ohio be the battlestates
actually Id sander will take ohio
Id say elsewhere will be red
Wrong.Cruisechef wrote:
My scenario:All four Republicans will remain in the race all the way to the convention. This will stop Trump from getting a majority of the delegates on the first vote. After the first vote, the delegates will be free to vote for anyone as it becomes a 'brokered convention'. The Republican establishment will push for Cruz as the nominee causing Trump to run as a third party candidate.
Clinton will win the Democratic nominee because that is what the Democratic establishment wants. Sanders is pulling a large majority of the young voters, but he cannot defeat money.
With Cruz as the Rep., Clinton as the Dem. and Trump as a third party independent, he will draw off enough votes from Cruz to let Clinton win.
And the country loses.
Didn't happen.Emperor Lelouch wrote:
Trump currently is the frontliner in the Republican vote but doubt he will get the Republican nomination.. The Florida Primary is coming up and its one of the most important ones. Florida is the most important swing vote cause of its 29 votes. California i doubt would vote for a Republican Candidate much how Texas will never vote for a Democrat Candidate. Rubio holds the best chance at winning the Florida Primary because of his latino heritage and was a former Senator from Florida. Without Jeb Bush running anymore, who was former Governor of Florida.Fyi i live in Florida
salbalkus wrote:
I'd say Hillary.It's pretty clear that Trump is going to win the Republican nomination. Even if Rubio takes Florida, it won't be enough to get him the nomination, and Cruz is running out of caucuses to win.
On the Democratic side, Hillary is simply going to take most of the superdelegates, leaving Bernie in the dust.
That leaves us with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Trump supporters tend to be more hardline and there's a lot of people who strongly dislike Trump, so I'd predict that more swing states will fall towards Hillary, if simply for a dislike of Trump. Plus, she has far more experience, and... well, we all know why Trump wouldn't be the *ahem* ideal politician.
Or, this happens:
Cruisechef wrote:
My scenario:All four Republicans will remain in the race all the way to the convention. This will stop Trump from getting a majority of the delegates on the first vote. After the first vote, the delegates will be free to vote for anyone as it becomes a 'brokered convention'. The Republican establishment will push for Cruz as the nominee causing Trump to run as a third party candidate.
Clinton will win the Democratic nominee because that is what the Democratic establishment wants. Sanders is pulling a large majority of the young voters, but he cannot defeat money.
With Cruz as the Rep., Clinton as the Dem. and Trump as a third party independent, he will draw off enough votes from Cruz to let Clinton win.
And the country loses.
That's offensive to my family and I. We're all smart, and hoping Trump will win. Both of my parents work very hard. Plus, you failed too.Emperor Lelouch wrote:
If Rubio wins Florida he would easily have a better chance of being the Republican Nomination over Trump, Trump is a front runner but thats only cause only his supporters are going out and voting. Meanwhile most of the people dont like Trump...aka the none idiots, the ones who actually have to work and actually have intelligence. Trump by far is the worst candidate as long as ive been born. Trump has a lot of supporters right now but he will not gain anymore. His main supporters are white supremacy and the percentage of the population who are fing stupid. If Rubio takes Florida i wouldnt be surprised if they choose him as the nominee right there. Like i said before Florida is the most important swing state. It literally can decide the next President like we did with Bush. Not only will Rubio hold the greatest advantage as being a former senator from Florida. He is well known in Florida and is Hispanic. A large portion of Florida's population is elderly and Hispanics. 2 groups that dont go well with Trump.salbalkus wrote:
I'd say Hillary.It's pretty clear that Trump is going to win the Republican nomination. Even if Rubio takes Florida, it won't be enough to get him the nomination, and Cruz is running out of caucuses to win.
On the Democratic side, Hillary is simply going to take most of the superdelegates, leaving Bernie in the dust.
That leaves us with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Trump supporters tend to be more hardline and there's a lot of people who strongly dislike Trump, so I'd predict that more swing states will fall towards Hillary, if simply for a dislike of Trump. Plus, she has far more experience, and... well, we all know why Trump wouldn't be the *ahem* ideal politician.
Or, this happens:
Cruisechef wrote:
My scenario:All four Republicans will remain in the race all the way to the convention. This will stop Trump from getting a majority of the delegates on the first vote. After the first vote, the delegates will be free to vote for anyone as it becomes a 'brokered convention'. The Republican establishment will push for Cruz as the nominee causing Trump to run as a third party candidate.
Clinton will win the Democratic nominee because that is what the Democratic establishment wants. Sanders is pulling a large majority of the young voters, but he cannot defeat money.
With Cruz as the Rep., Clinton as the Dem. and Trump as a third party independent, he will draw off enough votes from Cruz to let Clinton win.
And the country loses.
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
Kehsct wrote:
We're all smart
Do you know what smart means?Kehsct wrote:
and hoping Trump will win.
I think it means conservative?nemuritor98_ wrote:
Kehsct wrote:
We're all smartDo you know what smart means?Kehsct wrote:
and hoping Trump will win.
and libertarian gets effort points...
otherwise.. being able to admit what you dont know, that is the true mark of intelligence to me

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
Bottom one I agree with Ocean. Smart can also mean IQ. Or maybe just excelling in school. It's in my families genes.oceanhawk wrote:
I think it means conservative?and libertarian gets effort points...nemuritor98_ wrote:
Kehsct wrote:
We're all smartDo you know what smart means?Kehsct wrote:
and hoping Trump will win.otherwise.. being able to admit what you dont know, that is the true mark of intelligence to me
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
@oceanhawk it has nothing to do with political ideologies, you are wrong.
smart
smΙΛt/
adjective
informal
having or showing a quick-witted intelligence.
"if he was that smart he would never have been tricked"
synonyms:clever, bright, intelligent, sharp, sharp-witted, quick-witted, nimble-witted, shrewd, astute, acute, apt, able;
well being able to understand fact..Quasi-duck wrote:
@oceanhawk it has nothing to do with political ideologies, you are wrong.smart
smΙΛt/
adjective
informal
having or showing a quick-witted intelligence.
"if he was that smart he would never have been tricked"
synonyms:clever, bright, intelligent, sharp, sharp-witted, quick-witted, nimble-witted, shrewd, astute, acute, apt, able;
but really I mean the part at the bottom..

If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
I believe in Donald J. Trump of course. Maybe Sarah Palin on his running-mate? 
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
