I eat brains, therefore, I exist. - Rene Devourertes
23 Jun 2016, 19:19
Who will win the Pax Romana Zombie Challenge?
Will the humans fall to the zombie hordes?
Pax Romana Communications Officer
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
28 Replies
23 Jun 2016, 19:44
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
23 Jun 2016, 19:47
If you're running from the zombies, we're firing you.
Pax Romana Communications Officer
24 Jun 2016, 19:23
Well with a zombie apocalypse you only need to be able to run faster than the guy next to you
Forum Gang Divine Entity
Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time.
24 Jun 2016, 23:59
If the militia + forts don't win, it's user error.
25 Jun 2016, 00:02
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
25 Jun 2016, 09:19
Then the people will obviously win though.DxC wrote:
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
25 Jun 2016, 15:20
Lol, newspapers saw my troops have killed ~8,000 troops to the loss of.... one.
25 Jun 2016, 15:46
Trump will win this, his walls are invincible.
25 Jun 2016, 18:21
My point is that militia+forts vs INT is more powerful than INT+forts vs militia. Or more simply, forget the forts, militia should win against INT.Quasi-duck wrote:
Then the people will obviously win though.DxC wrote:
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
25 Jun 2016, 18:24
My stack of inf seems to be beating militia. At least I hope you mean inf, because here int means interceptor.DxC wrote:
My point is that militia+forts vs INT is more powerful than INT+forts vs militia. Or more simply, forget the forts, militia should win against INT.
25 Jun 2016, 19:10
DxC wrote:
My point is that militia+forts vs INT is more powerful than INT+forts vs militia. Or more simply, forget the forts, militia should win against INT.Quasi-duck wrote:
Then the people will obviously win though.DxC wrote:
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
Obviously there are a few variables that can change this, but usually playing a more defensive status as the Humans are, the Militia should win. Obviously now, a few others factors will play but in these situations, the milita will win. The forts will play an important role in these encounters, and the terrainQuasi-duck wrote:
My stack of inf seems to be beating militia. At least I hope you mean inf, because here int means interceptor.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
25 Jun 2016, 19:29
Yes I meant INF. But the point of militia vs INF is independent of forts and offense vs defense. You can generate more power and HP per time and support upkeep on more power and HP with militia vs INF. The only thing INF have going for them is speed. If you are thinking in terms of 1 INF vs 1 militia you are thinking about it wrong.
25 Jun 2016, 19:31
This is why I want a double likeDxC wrote:
Yes I meant INF. But the point of militia vs INF is independent of forts and offense vs defense. You can generate more power and HP per time and support upkeep on more power and HP with militia vs INF. The only thing INF have going for them is speed. If you are thinking in terms of 1 INF vs 1 militia you are thinking about it wrong.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
25 Jun 2016, 19:31
I see inf winning.
25 Jun 2016, 21:05
no, they dont.
Under most circumstances, Miltia win
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
26 Jun 2016, 03:10
youre using a stack of 15 inf against stacks of 2 militia...Quasi-duck wrote:
My stack of inf seems to be beating militia. At least I hope you mean inf, because here int means interceptor.DxC wrote:
My point is that militia+forts vs INT is more powerful than INT+forts vs militia. Or more simply, forget the forts, militia should win against INT.
Pax Romana Communications Officer
26 Jun 2016, 08:54
See? I'm such a great tactician.StrangeTalent wrote:
youre using a stack of 15 inf against stacks of 2 militia...
26 Jun 2016, 12:03
Not really... wasnt a good idea,Quasi-duck wrote:
See? I'm such a great tactician.StrangeTalent wrote:
youre using a stack of 15 inf against stacks of 2 militia...
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
26 Jun 2016, 16:22
Defeat it then.oceanhawk wrote:
Not really... wasnt a good idea,
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
