USA and UK
China would just be a drag on Russia. Joke of an armed forces.
Russia would be better off alone. But since this is Russia and China,
Im saying USA and UK
you should add a poll
This is a thread meant to discuss people/nations/animals pitted against each other.
First topic, who do you think would win in a war between US and UK vs Russia and China?
Rules for this battle
1. No nukes
2. no other countries can help militarily in anyway
3. They start with current resources, military, economy etc
4. war is won whenever the other side surrenders
Please log in to post a reply.
USA and UK
China would just be a drag on Russia. Joke of an armed forces.
Russia would be better off alone. But since this is Russia and China,
Im saying USA and UK
you should add a poll

It depends, does America have a giant wall?
It depends, do we have a giant wall of ice, with an army of wildlings!Sir McSquiggles wrote:
It depends, does America have a giant wall?

The answer is Russia and China. While their forces may be beaten conventionally, China has the most manpower and the two together have the most land in the world. Russia is the biggest country, while China has one of/the largest populations in the world.
So while forces may be defeated in open combat, the countries will never be subdued and will just turn into another Afghanistan, with plenty of IED's and the like.
Besides, the UK isn't much good. They only have 500 Challenger 2's, of which they cannot make ammo for, they make it in a factory in Belgium, I think it is. With no help from outside nations, they will have to build their own ammo factory.
The Americans can supply their ammoQuasi-duck wrote:
The answer is Russia and China. While their forces may be beaten conventionally, China has the most manpower and the two together have the most land in the world. Russia is the biggest country, while China has one of/the largest populations in the world.So while forces may be defeated in open combat, the countries will never be subdued and will just turn into another Afghanistan, with plenty of IED's and the like.
Besides, the UK isn't much good. They only have 500 Challenger 2's, of which they cannot make ammo for, they make it in a factory in Belgium, I think it is. With no help from outside nations, they will have to build their own ammo factory.
China ha, its a joke of an army. They dont even have a central command

Show me America's factories that produce ammo for the Challenger 2.oceanhawk wrote:
The Americans can supply their ammo
Source?oceanhawk wrote:
They dont even have a central command
That is what Japan thought in WWII. They've only gotten stronger since.oceanhawk wrote:
China ha, its a joke of an army.
If America has its Trump wall built, with the Watch guarding it... They would win...
United States and UK.
Reasons:
What kind of a moron attacks through Siberia....?Caesar wrote:
Russia would be unable to fight on two fronts, Russia would have to fight in the European front and the Asian front.
Yes, but Russian aviation is quantity over quality. Quantity is a quality of its own.Caesar wrote:
The North American aviation is technologically superior to China and Russia.
So would the Americans, no more Chinese made goods.Caesar wrote:
China would have supply problems, which would lead to riots.
During the first world war, Russia was defeated in Siberia by the German Navy, during World War II, the Germans controlled the sea of Siberia.Quasi-duck wrote:
What kind of a moron attacks through Siberia....?
An aircraft with American technology would be able to destroy 30 Russian aircraft.Quasi-duck wrote:
Yes, but Russian aviation is quantity over quality. Quantity is a quality of its own.
China would be difficult to supply, in fact, during the Chinese Civil War and World War II, the Chinese weren't unable to create supply lines.Quasi-duck wrote:
So would the Americans, no more Chinese made goods.
The sea of Siberia and Siberia are two very different things.....Caesar wrote:
During the first world war, Russia was defeated in Siberia by the German Navy, during World War II, the Germans controlled the sea of Siberia.
It'll get mobbed by them though and can only attack one at a time.Caesar wrote:
An aircraft with American technology would be able to destroy 30 Russian aircraft.
There were supply lines, just long ones. By the way, the Chinese have loads of trains and have transport aircraft. China is not a third world country, it can move supplies around.Caesar wrote:
China would be difficult to supply, in fact, during the Chinese Civil War and World War II, the Chinese weren't unable to create supply lines
Do you think that the Russian army would be able to endure 3 fronts in Europe and one in Asia?Quasi-duck wrote:
The sea of Siberia and Siberia are two very different things.....
The North American aviation is completely superior.Quasi-duck wrote:
It'll get mobbed by them though and can only attack one at a time.
These supply lines would be attacked by the planes.Quasi-duck wrote:
There were supply lines, just long ones. By the way, the Chinese have loads of trains and have transport aircraft. China is not a third world country, it can move supplies around.
Where are these fronts? Besides, American forces could not move through Siberia fast if they did attack there and the area is perfect for guerilla warfare.Caesar wrote:
Do you think that the Russian army would be able to endure 3 fronts in Europe and one in Asia?
Doesn't mean it will win. The Russians can produce cheap aircraft very fast. China has the manpower for pilots.Caesar wrote:
The North American aviation is completely superior.
Have you heard of the Ho Chi Minh trail?Caesar wrote:
These supply lines would be attacked by the planes.
Have you heard of bombing line supplies about Japan and Germany?Quasi-duck wrote:
Have you heard of the Ho Chi Minh trail?
The Ho Chi Minh trail and German/Japanese supply lines are very different.Caesar wrote:
Have you heard of bombing line supplies about Japan and Germany?
Ho Chi Minh trail is basically a trail through hard to navigate, both by planes and ground forces, terrain.
German supply lines are trains, trucks, and horse drawn carts along main roads.
Japanese supply lines are basically ships, 'cause it was supplying islands.
Notice the problems? Anyway, the Ho Chi Minh trail survived when American had overwhelming air superiority.
The North American Aviation would win.Quasi-duck wrote:
Anyway, the Ho Chi Minh trail survived when American had overwhelming air superiority.
They tried to defeat the Trail and couldn't already in the Vietnam War.....Caesar wrote:
The North American Aviation would win.
You've heard of the soviet war of Afghanistan?Quasi-duck wrote:
They tried to defeat the Trail and couldn't already in the Vietnam War.....
Of course I have, what about it?Caesar wrote:
You've heard of the soviet war of Afghanistan?
The many tanks and soldiers that has Russia, it is easy to defeat them with simple strategy.Quasi-duck wrote:
Of course I have, what about it?
Please log in to post a reply.