Yeah, guerilla warfare, which is what would happen to American troops in Siberia.Caesar wrote:
The many tanks and soldiers that has Russia, it is easy to defeat them with simple strategy.
14 Jun 2016, 14:23
Who would win?
This is a thread meant to discuss people/nations/animals pitted against each other.
First topic, who do you think would win in a war between US and UK vs Russia and China?
Rules for this battle
1. No nukes
2. no other countries can help militarily in anyway
3. They start with current resources, military, economy etc
4. war is won whenever the other side surrenders
yo, what did the pirate say to the parrot? ... he said, ARRR you y- i'm a cracker..? ahem.. s-sorry.. i'm not.. uh.. very *good* with uh.. y'know jokes. I don't know .. um, yeah i guess i uh... will just give you a quote! yeah.. thats what i'll do.. a quote..
ahem.. here's the quote:
"We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light."
ahem.. here's the quote:
"We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light."
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
176 Replies
14 Jun 2016, 14:25
The conditions of Siberia would prevent a guerrilla war.Quasi-duck wrote:
Yeah, guerilla warfare, which is what would happen to American troops in Siberia.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
14 Jun 2016, 14:26
Ehm, how?Caesar wrote:
The conditions of Siberia would prevent a guerrilla war.
14 Jun 2016, 14:27
The constant bombardment and the lack of supply lines would be unable to create a guerrilla force.Quasi-duck wrote:
Ehm, how?
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
14 Jun 2016, 14:29
You do know even something as simple as digging a ditch will slow down the American forces? Besides, the bombing didn't work too well against Iraqi's and Afghan's, now did it?Caesar wrote:
The constant bombardment and the lack of supply lines would be unable to create a guerrilla force.
14 Jun 2016, 14:31
The weather would prevent the creation of trenches.Quasi-duck wrote:
You do know even something as simple as digging a ditch will slow down the American forces? Besides, the bombing didn't work too well against Iraqi's and Afghan's, now did it?
Also, this thread need one poll, what do you think?
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
14 Jun 2016, 14:32
If it is too cold to dig the ground, then it will be too cold for US and UK forces to operate properly.Caesar wrote:
The weather would prevent the creation of trenches.
14 Jun 2016, 14:37
Perhaps, but a landing in Siberia with support is a victory.Quasi-duck wrote:
If it is too cold to dig the ground, then it will be too cold for US and UK forces to operate properly.
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
14 Jun 2016, 14:39
No it isn't. That is ridiculous.Caesar wrote:
Perhaps, but a landing in Siberia with support is a victory.
14 Jun 2016, 17:24
I havent even looked, but its not like they cant adaptQuasi-duck wrote:
Show me America's factories that produce ammo for the Challenger 2.oceanhawk wrote:
The Americans can supply their ammoSource?oceanhawk wrote:
They dont even have a central commandThat is what Japan thought in WWII. They've only gotten stronger since.oceanhawk wrote:
China ha, its a joke of an army.
They dont have a central command,
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/835937.shtml (state run media)
It was a joke in WW2, Thks to the American's it became a fierce force.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
14 Jun 2016, 17:31
So, they run their army differently? That is what seems to be going on here.oceanhawk wrote:
They dont have a central command,globaltimes.cn/content/835937.shtml (state run media)
So you are saying the Chinese army is a fierce force thanks to the Americans? Well, it is more Western powers in general but so-so.oceanhawk wrote:
It was a joke in WW2, Thks to the American's it became a fierce force.
14 Jun 2016, 19:23
Stalemate.
- China actually spends twice as much on their military than publicly announced. Most of that money goes through other channels.
- The US and UK navy would prevent Chinese or Russian troops from invading north America
- If China and Russia made it to north America... well, watch Red Dawn.
- Russia could cut of US supply lines from the middle east (US still has oil, though)
- We all know what happens when winter hits an invading army in Russia. On top of that, the US army hasn't been in a conflict in a cold climate since Korea (as far as I know)
- UK is not a weak nation, but Russia is more powerful. US would have to send troops to Europe to assist, but that would take away assets from the pacific.
- Everybody would run out of money really fast because their all fighting their main trading partners.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls
you are a balls
14 Jun 2016, 19:36
It depends. Whoever is on the defensive wins.Jacey521 wrote:
This is a thread meant to discuss people/nations/animals pitted against each other.First topic, who do you think would win in a war between US and UK vs Russia and China?
Rules for this battle
1. No nukes
2. no other countries can help militarily in anyway
3. They start with current resources, military, economy etc
4. war is won whenever the other side surrenders
Look, I don't care how many MiG-31s and Su-24 they have, no one, absolutely no one, can beat a good pilot in an F-15.Quasi-duck wrote:
Yes, but Russian aviation is quantity over quality. Quantity is a quality of its own.
The past is a foreign country.
14 Jun 2016, 19:47
Except for like, I dunno, 50 MiG pilots?Pablo22510 wrote:
Look, I don't care how many MiG-31s and Su-24 they have, no one, absolutely no one, can beat a good pilot in an F-15.
Russia cannot project power, China is building it's navy. So USUK are attacking.Pablo22510 wrote:
It depends. Whoever is on the defensive wins.
14 Jun 2016, 20:10
Hahaha, yea see Id say that might make the chinease army a little inifecintQuasi-duck wrote:
So, they run their army differently? That is what seems to be going on here.oceanhawk wrote:
They dont have a central command,globaltimes.cn/content/835937.shtml (state run media)
So you are saying the Chinese army is a fierce force thanks to the Americans? Well, it is more Western powers in general but so-so.oceanhawk wrote:
It was a joke in WW2, Thks to the American's it became a fierce force.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
14 Jun 2016, 20:11
Apparently not if they are pushing the US out of the South China.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha, yea see Id say that might make the chinease army a little inifecint
14 Jun 2016, 20:16
I think today, America is on top of Russia, in another ten years, with the F-35s, Russia will rule the skies.GreatbigHippo wrote:
Stalemate.
- China actually spends twice as much on their military than publicly announced. Most of that money goes through other channels.
- The US and UK navy would prevent Chinese or Russian troops from invading north America
- If China and Russia made it to north America... well, watch Red Dawn.
- Russia could cut of US supply lines from the middle east (US still has oil, though)
- We all know what happens when winter hits an invading army in Russia. On top of that, the US army hasn't been in a conflict in a cold climate since Korea (as far as I know)
- UK is not a weak nation, but Russia is more powerful. US would have to send troops to Europe to assist, but that would take away assets from the pacific.
- Everybody would run out of money really fast because their all fighting their main trading partners.
Chinease forces, havent been deployed in mass, since 1989 in Tiananmen Square. And havent fought a war since Korea.
They have no experience, and their generals are Communist party politicans, not even army men..
Russia would be better off, nuking china, then carrying on with the war, China will just be a drag.
Russia, will be pretty lethal do.
UK isnt weak, no. Best marines and special forces around
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
14 Jun 2016, 20:17
Not really. I dont actually think, the Chinease navy, have actually ever been in a naval battleQuasi-duck wrote:
Apparently not if they are pushing the US out of the South China.oceanhawk wrote:
Hahaha, yea see Id say that might make the chinease army a little inifecint
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
14 Jun 2016, 20:19
The US armed forces has a lot of civvies in it.oceanhawk wrote:
their generals are Communist party politicans, not even army men..
That is just moronic.oceanhawk wrote:
Russia would be better off, nuking china, then carrying on with the war, China will just be a drag.
Point being? As of late, 3 SEALs were killed by two terrorists with a mortar.oceanhawk wrote:
UK isnt weak, no. Best marines and special forces around
14 Jun 2016, 20:20
Hahahaha, don't need to be. US and China aren't at war, but China is still gaining more power. Just read about what they are doing with their artificial islands.oceanhawk wrote:
Not really. I dont actually think, the Chinease navy, have actually ever been in a naval battle
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
