Would You Rather

No infantry. Infantry can be made up by planes, tanks or even just SP units. But without artillery, my wars are going to cost me a lot more units, and potentially lose me the game.

Would you rather backstab an ally to win the game, or attack an enemy you know you can't beat to let your friends win?

Might be alone here, but I'd rather go down in flames than betray an ally.

Would you rather use Level 6 interceptors and no other plane, or level 6 tactical bombers and no other plane?

Level 6 Tactical Bombers. With fighters, I can do no damage to other units other than airplanes. Anti-air can help if I have no fighters to stack with my fighters.

You are being attacked by a group of planes and tanks on a plains core province. Would you rather have 10 Anti-air or 10 Anti-tanks?

Both are bad alone, but I guess 10 anti-tanks is the better option since planes can't take provinces.

Would you rather win without dignity, or lose like a hero?

lose like a hero

Would you rather have everything you could ever need or just have enough to get by, with much more to lose?

mrchuikov wrote:

lose like a hero

Would you rather have everything you could ever need or just have enough to get by, with much more to lose?

Ryan04px2025 wrote:

mrchuikov wrote:

lose like a hero

Would you rather have everything you could ever need or just have enough to get by, with much more to lose?

What do you mean?

ok...

(continue) Would you rather kill a cat or kill a dog?

Vamaw wrote:

(continue) Would you rather kill a cat or kill a dog?

Would you rather not go to forum for a week or not play COW for 4 days?

Ryan04px2025 wrote:

Vamaw wrote:

(continue) Would you rather kill a cat or kill a dog?

I would kill a cat. Because I cannot hear the sound of the cat screaming/barking. Really hard question. But if I had a chance, I will kill neither.

Would you rather not go to forum for a week or not play COW for 4 days?

Would you rather have no oil and tons of tanks, or no food and tons of infantry?

No oil and tons of tanks. I've found out oil is pretty easy and cheap to find on the market. Plus I don't normally use armored units anyways haha.

Would you rather play Historical World War 1939 as Luxembourg or Danzig?

Luxembourg easily. You can beef up them fortifications, get some artillery, and huzzah, you're now invincible.

Would you rather get rid of the America: Homefront map, or the 50 player Pacific Conquest Map?

Pacific Conquest map, it's basically world at war with less size and players

Would you rather never be able to build any battleships, or never be able to build any submarines.

No battleships, definitely. Battleships take a level 3 port, and tons of resources. I could easily build 5 subs for the cost of one battleship.

Would you rather lose 30 transports at sea or 30 airplanes on the ground?

General Nightman wrote:

No battleships, definitely. Battleships take a level 3 port, and tons of resources. I could easily build 5 subs for the cost of one battleship.

Would you rather lose 30 transports at sea or 30 airplanes on the ground?

Would you rather use only medium tanks in the armor branch, or only cruisers in the naval branch? (For example, you can ONLY use medium tanks, and no other armor vehicle, or only cruisers, and no other naval vehicle, if you need clarification.)

Medium tanks, tough one, but pretty much everything in the Armor tree is just a metallic version of an infantry unit.

Would you rather have an aggressive gold-spamming noob as a neighbor, or an aggressive veteran.