I myself have to go for Genghis Khan.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Copying Butter Ball Bill's idea of the prettiest plane of all times, I bring up the topic of your favourite military commander. No time limits. Only requirement is that he/she actually existes/exists.
Having said all of that, I would go for Patton.

Please log in to post a reply.
I myself have to go for Genghis Khan.
Agreed, especially because the Nazis and the Soviets were terrified of him.Pablo22510 wrote:
Having said all of that, I would go for Patton.
So much so, I believe there is now a theory and book that Stalin had Patton killed.
Yes, it's called Killing Patton. Presumably, the anti-Soviet attittude of Patton (and that he didn't hate Nazis) made the U.S. angry. The OSS then organized a car crash*, which badly injured Patton, but when they saw he was recovering and would be able to go and command the 3rd Army again, they allowed a Soviet agent to poison him.
* Patton's chauffeur was substituted for an OSS one name Woodring, who presumably caused the car crash.
My favorite is Sun tzu the author of the Art of War he was both a philosopher and military commander during the warring state period.
I'd believe it, his death never made much sense. Then the movie Patton seemed to be trying to hard to tie it in with his story arch and it never fit well.Pablo22510 wrote:
Yes, it's called Killing Patton. Presumably, the anti-Soviet attittude of Patton (and that he didn't hate Nazis) made the U.S. angry. The OSS then organized a car crash*, which badly injured Patton, but when they saw he was recovering and would be able to go and command the 3rd Army again, they allowed a Soviet agent to poison him.* Patton's chauffeur was substituted for an OSS one name Woodring, who presumably caused the car crash.
For anyone who's actually seen combat, it's incredible how applicable that book still can be.V1nd1cat0r wrote:
My favorite is Sun tzu the author of the Art of War he was both a philosopher and military commander during the warring state period.
My decision would be split, my Patriotic side would hail Field marshal Bernard Montgomery, but the more logical side would lean against Field Marshal Georgy Zhukov.
I am adding the Desert Fox.
First, some facts -
1.) Rommel died because he hated Hitler.
2.) Rommel was a "Conservative" in the tradition of Bismarck - they did not mesh well with Nazis.
3.) Rommel's behavior towards his troops was more in keeping with the pre-Nazi German traditions.
That being clearly stated, the man was a strategic genius who rightfully deserves his namesake.
Rommel was the second best general. He treated captured enemy troops and his troops alike. He refused to kill commandos. He was deeply anti-Nazi, and followed the Prussian battlefield laws/code of honour. Read a book called 'Killing Rommel'. Although it's main about the LRDG, it outlines how well rommel treated British prisoners. It mentions how in German camps, British injured sat next to German injured. The book is just beautiful.
I support the Rommel entry, he was definitely one of the most respectable/admirable generals of his era, especially considering the side he was on.
Totally agree.
These are my 5 favorites in order of their intellect: Sun Tzu β Alexander the great β Patton β Zhuge Liang β Rommel
Kalantigos wrote:
I support the Rommel entry, he was definitely one of the most respectable/admirable generals of his era, especially considering the side he was on.
I agree with you both, he was in the pre-Nazi (and anti-Nazi) Germano-Prussian tradition. One that should be admired and applauded.Pablo22510 wrote:
Rommel was the second best general. He treated captured enemy troops and his troops alike. He refused to kill commandos. He was deeply anti-Nazi, and followed the Prussian battlefield laws/code of honour.
I believe it was attributed to Rommel the sentiment that the English should not have been enemies.
Even Bismarck at worst considered England a rival due to their attempts to restrain Germany on the continent. But in no way would have done anything remotely resembling what the diplomatically inept, classless, imbecile Hitler did.
I don't know why you would kill any prisoners, if you treat them nice I am sure they would have no problem doing manual labour. Just feed them well and give them decent housing and I am sure they will be co-operative. Let them play sports and such too, maybe arrange a tournament between all the POW camps with the guards and POW's playing together and broadcast it to all the camps via radio(in English so most of the POW's would understand it). You could also use that for anti-British and American propaganda which would show how nice Germans were.
......this isn't true.... when German Generals were asked what they think about General Patton their answer was.."Who?"itsDeems wrote:
Agreed, especially because the Nazis and the Soviets were terrified of him.So much so, I believe there is now a theory and book that Stalin had Patton killed.Pablo22510 wrote:
Having said all of that, I would go for Patton.
My top General:

Inchon was really cliffy and a 'stupid' place to land, wasn't it? The Korean war was great, lot of brave men. Did you know that, through trial and error, American pilots could chase MiG's back into China by finding out where the Chinese radar was and then get the MiG's in those pockets, shoot them down and fly away. At least one MiG was shot down by a British Sea Fury, the best propeller ever made(I think).
Are you kidding? German generals were terrified of Patton. They thought he was the best Allied general. Rommel and Patton had deep respect for each other. Kesselring wanted to go up against anybody EXCEPT Patton.Emperor Lelouch wrote:
.this isn't true.... when German Generals were asked what they think about General Patton their answer was.."Who?"
Actually, German generals highly respect Patton, but to be terrified? Not even the slightest, he was regarded by both allies and axis a master tank commander.
Patton was his name, and armoured warfare is his game. Master of both speed and steel.
Patton was indeed one of Americas best general, what's preventing him from being greatest? He is very predictable a common trait for all tank commanders, He maybe one of the best, His army may be a wall of steel and firepower, but He can be seen by the horizon at midnight, and yes that's an exaguration, sorry about that. A general is someone who is a master in the art of warfare, to Sun Tzu warfare can be an art, to Patton? Supremacy and crude yet effective brute strenght and nothing else.
I might appear to underrate the man but I'm not, you need to see both sides of the coin to trully learn, good or ill.
about MacArthur he was commander of the USAFE (United states armed forces of the far east) and serve as the military adviser to the Philippines, although at the time he was the ONLY general in the area to have merit so that might explain him being a general of the phillipine army but he is not.
To be honest he is more of a politician during his time in my country, before and after the war, he was Americas will personified to the eyes of the Filipinos, and I have to tell you because of him the phillipines became Americas personal lap dog. Say whatever you like about this, but remember you were not born in the phillipines to know the real after effect of the war that leads up till today, unlike someone who see and feel it like I do.
Please log in to post a reply.