Backstabbing is part of the game

I dont know why some people are being childish and stupid at this but backstabbing is part of the game!!!

why dont people understand this.....everybody gets backstabbed so pls stop being childish

it just makes the game more fun for everyone ... I know it is bad to backstab allies but if ur ally isnt doing any good and worse levelled players are winning on him i think his resource will be better for you

so everyone pls dont be like that why did u backstab me and shit even trust issues our created I know but its part of the game

If you dont wanna get backstabbed and dont want to enjoy then pls join alliance games because even in world war 2 backstabbing has happened

Pls comment ur views thank you

:wallbash

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

35 Replies

I know many of you guys wont agree with me because backstabbing is annoying I know but i dont think we should enjoy this segment in the game too and not cry like a child

I always expect to be backstabbed so I leave units in place to defend against it, which usually means I don't get backstabbed. Leaving yourself open invites it. Once you have proved yourself to your allies, the threat diminishes but never goes away completely. It is hilarious when a coalition that is full wants you to "help them out" and they can't understand why you say no, knowing that they just want to set you up for them to, to quote the Borg, assimilate you into their collective lol :tumbleweed:

lol thanks for reply bro i just want people to enjoy

not cry when they get backstabbed and if they still get then try to win or lose because its just a game and you did what you could

Pls like and share with frnds

thank you

When you enter a coalition with other players, each of you has signed a little treaty with one another to cooperate with, aid, and support the others. Backstabbing is a sign that you cannot - and will not - be trusted. It shows you have no honor, that you don't care whether or not your allies are on your side. It's one thing to take over an ally who isn't carrying their weight, but to take over an equal solely on the grounds that you had the option to is a massive blow to people's opinion of you. Instead of a decent comrade, you are now the calm traitor.

At least, such is my view of the matter. Is it a legitimate strategy? Yes. Is it a despicable practice? I believe so.

β€œI may be stupid, as you say, to believe in honour and friendship and loyalty without price. But these are virtues to be cherished, for without them we are no more than beasts roaming the land.”

― David Gemmell, Shield of Thunder

Don't blindly trust an opponent until they give you a reason to trust them, through their deeds and actions. Until then, be on guard.

I feel like some players forget that it's a war game xD this is call of war not call of peace so backstabbing is bound to happen one way or another. After all everyone gets backstabbed at least once even the good players. Nobody loves getting backstabbed but it requires strategy to make things interesting otherwise the game would be boring without it.

WascallywabbitCDN wrote:

I always expect to be backstabbed so I leave units in place to defend against it, which usually means I don't get backstabbed. Leaving yourself open invites it. Once you have proved yourself to your allies, the threat diminishes but never goes away completely. It is hilarious when a coalition that is full wants you to "help them out" and they can't understand why you say no, knowing that they just want to set you up for them to, to quote the Borg, assimilate you into their collective lol :tumbleweed:
Exactly. The best way to avoid getting backstabbed is too keep tabs on your allies as well as your enemies and also talk with them. Make them feel involved. And have precautions. Have a home defense force of motorized infantry and fortify borders with troops, but don't be invasive. I know militia's are useless, but if you have them on the border with an ally, it will slow down troops if they attack you but it will also not scare allies into thinking you're gonna backstabe.

JesterTheSheep wrote:

When you enter a coalition with other players, each of you has signed a little treaty with one another to cooperate with, aid, and support the others. Backstabbing is a sign that you cannot - and will not - be trusted. It shows you have no honor, that you don't care whether or not your allies are on your side. It's one thing to take over an ally who isn't carrying their weight, but to take over an equal solely on the grounds that you had the option to is a massive blow to people's opinion of you. Instead of a decent comrade, you are now the calm traitor.

At least, such is my view of the matter. Is it a legitimate strategy? Yes. Is it a despicable practice? I believe so.

Backstabbing is fun af tho

I played a game on the Pacific and I convinced one member of a North American coalition to leave his coalition for mine, and then he backstabbed his ex-coalition mates. I asked him if he wanted to win or not. He chose wisely lol

Even more fun when someone backstabs you and you get the better of them. Then when they ask for mercy you answer with :

NUTS!Anthony McAuliffe

β€” His famous reply to the German demand for surrender of the surrounded US 101st Airborne Division at Bastogne in the Battle of the Bulge (22 December 1944), as quoted in Bastogne : The Story of the First Eight Days In Which the 101st Airborne Division Was Closed Within the Ring of German Forces (1946) by Colonel S. L. A. Marshal, Ch. 14; delivering the message Colonel Joseph H. Harper was asked "What does that mean? … Is this affirmative or negative?" and replied "Definitely not affirmative."

I wonder if some of us played too much Grand Theft Auto as children.

The only person that can stab you in the back, is the person you are foolish enough to let stand behind you with a knife!

When I get backstabbed, I look at it as more my fault for not being properly prepared!

It is a necessary part of the game, anyone that trusts other they do not know~~well thats their choice!

Very few games are won as individuals in this game, so choose wisely, who you ally with, and how much you trust them

pjrobbo wrote:

β€œI may be stupid, as you say, to believe in honour and friendship and loyalty without price. But these are virtues to be cherished, for without them we are no more than beasts roaming the land.”

― David Gemmell, Shield of Thunder

Great quote! ... Got to live by some virtuous principles, otherwise we are no more than beasts roaming the land- as the quote said ... :thumbup:

Trust and choosing allies is hard especially if you don't know the player well on day 1. Now when i play a small part of me expects to be backstabbed or betrayed with my allies unless their words match up with their actions. Unless i know my allies well i put up my guard.

Always expect the unexpected! Play to win! Honor didnt help Ned stark, nor did it prevent his end! (Still sad rip) Germany and Russia were allies until... Invasion! The key to winning is using any opportunity, and back stabbing is one of them.

SirMcSquiggles Jr. wrote:

Always expect the unexpected! Play to win! Honor didnt help Ned stark, nor did it prevent his end! (Still sad rip) Germany and Russia were allies until... Invasion! The key to winning is using any opportunity, and back stabbing is one of them.
Honour might not have helped Ned Stark, even if it is a fictional story, but in the end, karma did come for those responsible. When it comes down to it, all you have is your honour and reputation to speak for you in interactions with others.

Exactly. So in my recent game there is this guy whining about being betrayed and getting picked on in a 3 vs 1 situation.

Betrayals are a part of warfare. And this is a war strategy game. If you don’t like betrayals, just play the sims! If you don’t like it, why play it

For some it is easier to complain. He is just upset that they did it before he could probably :thumbsup:

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Questions and Answers
Quick Launch