best build

what is the best build please

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

50 Replies

All naval units except subs carriers.

There, fixed it for you.

lol,

Carriers are worth it in panasian

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.

Island bases are better tbh…

[/size][/size]

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.

Island bases are better tbh…

[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.Island bases are better tbh…[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
And even with those, if you can establish a presence on mainland Africa/Oceania, it becomes a non-issue.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.Island bases are better tbh…[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
And even with those, if you can establish a presence on mainland Africa/Oceania, it becomes a non-issue.
Yes. Since you'll only need them in the early game (until you get a high level airbase on the mainland), you only need to research Level 1.
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.Island bases are better tbh…[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
And even with those, if you can establish a presence on mainland Africa/Oceania, it becomes a non-issue.
Yes. Since you'll only need them in the early game (until you get a high level airbase on the mainland), you only need to research Level 1.
Sometimes it’s good to put them in a stationary place in the ocean so they can act like an airstrip and allow planes to pass, for example from West Africa to Brazil in South America.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.Island bases are better tbh…[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
And even with those, if you can establish a presence on mainland Africa/Oceania, it becomes a non-issue.
Yes. Since you'll only need them in the early game (until you get a high level airbase on the mainland), you only need to research Level 1.
Sometimes it’s good to put them in a stationary place in the ocean so they can act like an airstrip and allow planes to pass, for example from West Africa to Brazil in South America.
Yes, guarded by Destroyers and Subs of course.
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.Island bases are better tbh…[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
And even with those, if you can establish a presence on mainland Africa/Oceania, it becomes a non-issue.
Yes. Since you'll only need them in the early game (until you get a high level airbase on the mainland), you only need to research Level 1.
Sometimes it’s good to put them in a stationary place in the ocean so they can act like an airstrip and allow planes to pass, for example from West Africa to Brazil in South America.
Yes, guarded by Destroyers and Subs of course.
That’s a foolish idea, instead I have a horde of nukes around. 40-50 bombers will do.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

z00mz00m wrote:

I find subs useful 10x more often than I find a legitimate use for carrieers.
This is very true. Sometimes I get subs, sometimes I don’t. But I basically NEVERRRRR [size=14][size=12]ever get carriers.Island bases are better tbh…[/size][/size]
Unless you're playing an isolated naval country (like New Zealand or Madagascar) there's no need for carriers.
And even with those, if you can establish a presence on mainland Africa/Oceania, it becomes a non-issue.
Yes. Since you'll only need them in the early game (until you get a high level airbase on the mainland), you only need to research Level 1.
Sometimes it’s good to put them in a stationary place in the ocean so they can act like an airstrip and allow planes to pass, for example from West Africa to Brazil in South America.
Yes, guarded by Destroyers and Subs of course.
That’s a foolish idea, instead I have a horde of nukes around. 40-50 bombers will do.
Surely you jest?
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Of course not, your lordship. The power of a swarm of nuclear bombers is simply unmatchable. Assured destruction, but not mutual.

Let's get real.

“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Let me pose a question. Who would win? The Royal navy of 1939, all gathered near Malta, or a 25 kiloton nuclear bomb? What do you mean whoever has air support? You dare not mention interceptors and anti air! Foool! The bombs will fall!

Carking the 6th wrote:

Let me pose a question. Who would win? The Royal navy of 1939, all gathered near Malta, or a 25 kiloton nuclear bomb? What do you mean whoever has air support? You dare not mention interceptors and anti air! Foool! The bombs will fall!
Forum attachment
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Forum attachment

Forum attachment

“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Forum attachment

On a serious note, let’s not spam

“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

Brando Dilla wrote:

On a serious note, let’s not spam
Alright, Alright. You got me, I just couldn’t resist a good Garfield meme!

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Questions and Answers
Quick Launch