In my experience, Upper Volta, French Sudan, Goias, New England, Quebec, Tibet, and the Philippines have good records.
I may or may not be withholding valuable information on certain ones I prefer.
what is it?
Please log in to post a reply.
In my experience, Upper Volta, French Sudan, Goias, New England, Quebec, Tibet, and the Philippines have good records.
I may or may not be withholding valuable information on certain ones I prefer.
speak those information than delete them after 3 mins!
I experience a lot of players from North Argentina playing with massive success. Same with South Africa and Southwest Africa.
ok thanks
Yugoslavia is one of the better countries from my experience. Its resources at the province level are good and you can use the natural naval choke point to restrict access to the coast of your core. I like South Sudan for the same reasons.
My favorites are Alberta and Turkey. Alberta is for Fat Albert reasons, Turkey is because I always play it all the time, but also since it has a great position. You can easily spread to three continents, and I usually donβt have trouble being attacked by many fronts
No commentCarking the 6th wrote:
Alberta is for Fat Albert reasons
I would say Burma or Indochina, mostly cause of the benefits of being able to see further, and the capability to expand north, west, or east. I also like South Africa because you just have to worry going up, and being attacked from your north!
trade offerLord Crayfish wrote:
In my experience, Upper Volta, French Sudan, Goias, New England, Quebec, Tibet, and the Philippines have good records.I may or may not be withholding valuable information on certain ones I prefer.
You get: nitro on discord.
I get: the secret information on these ideal countries.
Deal? 
Another thing to consider and one of the most important in my opinion is your positioning on the map for morale purposes later in the game. For instance, Australia would never be ideal in my opinion because you have a huge distance to lose morale points from whenever expanding off the continent.
Yes, you can move your capital, but then you have to deal with the distance to capital penalty with your cores. In the later game, dealing with a -20 expansion penalty and -20 distance to capital is very punishing.
Anyways, love Turkey, Syria, Iraq, North Sudan and Nigeria as well as others in that area depending on my doctrine preference.
I also recently played as Illinois for the first time, which has the best rural resource generation for the Allies Doctrine in my opinion (2 goods and 2 rares).
Are you sure that's Illinois with 2 goods and 2 rare rural provinces? My notes have them with 2 metal and 2 goods. North USA has the rural 2 goods and 2 rare resource combination. I also consider those resources to be the most valuable for how I play allies.GingerParty84 wrote:
Another thing to consider and one of the most important in my opinion is your positioning on the map for morale purposes later in the game. For instance, Australia would never be ideal in my opinion because you have a huge distance to lose morale points from whenever expanding off the continent.Yes, you can move your capital, but then you have to deal with the distance to capital penalty with your cores. In the later game, dealing with a -20 expansion penalty and -20 distance to capital is very punishing.
Anyways, love Turkey, Syria, Iraq, North Sudan and Nigeria as well as others in that area depending on my doctrine preference.
I also recently played as Illinois for the first time, which has the best rural resource generation for the Allies Doctrine in my opinion (2 goods and 2 rares).
Also with that same combination as allies is California and North Sudan. Both have coastal core cities. North Sudan is nice because you and/or your allies can secure access to the Red Sea and using naval choke points, your coasts are clear.
Germany is ironically good for just that reason. As long as you can survive with the players around you, you have a dense area to conquer land. After you finish Europe, you can storm the old world there or go to America easily.
I'm playing as illinois right now and unless I've been up for long enough to start seeing things, it's definitely 2 rare, 2 goods, 1 oil, 1 metal.6thDragon wrote:
Are you sure that's Illinois with 2 goods and 2 rare rural provinces? My notes have them with 2 metal and 2 goods. North USA has the rural 2 goods and 2 rare resource combination. I also consider those resources to be the most valuable for how I play allies.GingerParty84 wrote:
Another thing to consider and one of the most important in my opinion is your positioning on the map for morale purposes later in the game. For instance, Australia would never be ideal in my opinion because you have a huge distance to lose morale points from whenever expanding off the continent.Yes, you can move your capital, but then you have to deal with the distance to capital penalty with your cores. In the later game, dealing with a -20 expansion penalty and -20 distance to capital is very punishing.
Anyways, love Turkey, Syria, Iraq, North Sudan and Nigeria as well as others in that area depending on my doctrine preference.
I also recently played as Illinois for the first time, which has the best rural resource generation for the Allies Doctrine in my opinion (2 goods and 2 rares).
Also with that same combination as allies is California and North Sudan. Both have coastal core cities. North Sudan is nice because you and/or your allies can secure access to the Red Sea and using naval choke points, your coasts are clear.
Please log in to post a reply.