No - will open up for multi abuse.
20 Jun 2016, 09:33
Coalition trades
In regard to coalitions and core provinces.
If a coalition member gets attacked and looses his land, but an ally comes in to help and they win. The one coalition member should be able to trade back core lands without it counting against the land trade limit.
This happened within my coalition. To give land back, I gave him units (1 per territory), and when we were ready, he left the coalition, declared war, took the lands, sent a peace offering, I accepted, he reapplied to the coalition, and I accepted his return. Just exhausted reading all of that
My suggestion would be to allow us to trade back core lands to original owner with out having to go through all that or count against your trade limit.
And the reason we did this, it was better for him to stay in the game and help the alliance succeed vs letting a player leave and have a hole within the coalition. Now he is a power in our efferts against another coalition.
4 Replies
20 Jun 2016, 15:29
It's a cool idea, but it would only work if everyone in CoW didn't cheat. Sadly, that is not the case. If someone created multi-accounts, joined the same game and same coalition, it would be easily abusable.David Tormaschy wrote:
In regard to coalitions and core provinces.If a coalition member gets attacked and looses his land, but an ally comes in to help and they win. The one coalition member should be able to trade back core lands without it counting against the land trade limit.
This happened within my coalition. To give land back, I gave him units (1 per territory), and when we were ready, he left the coalition, declared war, took the lands, sent a peace offering, I accepted, he reapplied to the coalition, and I accepted his return. Just exhausted reading all of that
My suggestion would be to allow us to trade back core lands to original owner with out having to go through all that or count against your trade limit.
And the reason we did this, it was better for him to stay in the game and help the alliance succeed vs letting a player leave and have a hole within the coalition. Now he is a power in our efferts against another coalition.
The past is a foreign country.
23 Jun 2016, 02:55
That is why I felt it should be the original core provinces. Non-Core would be just as it is now and only as Coaliton members.
23 Jun 2016, 09:05
Still, it is open for abuse.David Tormaschy wrote:
That is why I felt it should be the original core provinces. Non-Core would be just as it is now and only as Coaliton members.
The past is a foreign country.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
