Crusiers vs Batlleships for axis.

I am at a crossroads for going with one or the other.

For starters, I will be using submarines as my standard anti-ship weapon.

However I could use one other type of ship as "costal dominators" along with some destroyers for my navy.

For battleships they have a lot stronger capacity for that role. Much better w8th the extra range and damage w8th relatively similar cost and facility level required. But I fear naval bombers.

Cruisers are less capable but I won't worry about that.

But who produces naval bombers anyway?

Unless I meet someone who pumps out such units (I personally hate using them as I find them very niche, something similar to paratroopers) then I would lose a rather significant naval bombardment power.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

36 Replies

you know nothing Kyrollous

MarshalOfVictory89 wrote:

you know nothing Kyrollous
Bro came back for that first time in a month with a whole takedown

CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

You don’t need destroyers

havent u seen my thread

SKULL EMOTE FTW

Battleships are getting OP. Subs are the new cool ones

Not sure that if you’d enjoy the old days of OP Cruisers, though.


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Kyrollous wrote:

But who produces naval bombers anyway?

Unless I meet someone who pumps out such units (I personally hate using them as I find them very niche, something similar to paratroopers) then I would lose a rather significant naval bombardment power.

You don't produce NBs? You're screwed. NBs plus Subs beat anything on the sea. (NBs kill all units except cruisers, and subs kill all units except destroyers)

Carking the 6th wrote:

Not sure that if you’d enjoy the old days of OP Cruisers, though.
Ah, the old times. Glad it changed tho, cruisers were a tad bit too OP

_Pyth0n_ wrote:

Kyrollous wrote:

But who produces naval bombers anyway?

Unless I meet someone who pumps out such units (I personally hate using them as I find them very niche, something similar to paratroopers) then I would lose a rather significant naval bombardment power.

You don't produce NBs? You're screwed. NBs plus Subs beat anything on the sea. (NBs kill all units except cruisers, and subs kill all units except destroyers)
That's kinda obvious that each unit has atleast one counter unit, otherwise Bytro would have to shut down

MarshalOfVictory89 wrote:

you know nothing Kyrollous
:(

Kyrollous wrote:

I am at a crossroads for going with one or the other.

For starters, I will be using submarines as my standard anti-ship weapon.

However I could use one other type of ship as "costal dominators" along with some destroyers for my navy.

For battleships they have a lot stronger capacity for that role. Much better w8th the extra range and damage w8th relatively similar cost and facility level required. But I fear naval bombers.

Cruisers are less capable but I won't worry about that.

But who produces naval bombers anyway?

Unless I meet someone who pumps out such units (I personally hate using them as I find them very niche, something similar to paratroopers) then I would lose a rather significant naval bombardment power.

Just don’t

Use artillery and rely on upgrading your subs for naval dominance

Looking for improvement.

Don't underestimate NB, they're a VERY popular unit amongst experienced players.

Apparently the only one in the case of the snake

Forum attachment


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Carking the 6th wrote:

Apparently the only one in the case of the snake

Forum attachment

Only what?

Along with carriers, naval unit


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Carking the 6th wrote:

Along with carriers, naval unit
Never said that, you also need subs. But besides those, yea, other ships are useless (Except convoys ^^)

Subs kinda suck though, and anytime you go inactive would mean certain death for your fleet. Just gotta study your sleep schedule.. even a couple of hours is enough.


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Carking the 6th wrote:

Subs kinda suck though, and anytime you go inactive would mean certain death for your fleet. Just gotta study your sleep schedule.. even a couple of hours is enough.
Pshhh, who needs sleep? You're talking to the guy that takes catnaps throughout the day and sleeps at 4AM :D

Two three hours? Work? More than enough time…


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Carking the 6th wrote:

Two three hours? Work? More than enough time…
Bro I ain't sending subs on missions to the coast when I sleep, they're always near my patrol zone. But I'm getting ahead of myself, you'll learn my secret tactics... :D

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Questions and Answers
Quick Launch