They did do that job in WW2.
How about making the commandos paratroopers?
What great possibilities if the commandos could parachute behind enemy lines!!
80 Replies
It would be useful to use them as a disposable meatshield you can throw at the enemy behind his lines but other than that I fail to see any produced Para unit being used more than once and surviving. Marines might be a good addition but I see people calling them swimming militia and saying they are terrible *Cough* fatman *cough*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
lolcomrade dave wrote:
Marines might be a good addition but I see people calling them swimming militia and saying they are terrible *Cough* fatman *cough*
Yeah, they wouldn't survive, but still pretty useful.comrade dave wrote:
It would be useful to use them as a disposable meatshield you can throw at the enemy behind his lines but other than that I fail to see any produced Para unit being used more than once and surviving
No, I like the idea of Marines. Paratroopers disgust me though.comrade dave wrote:
Marines might be a good addition but I see people calling them swimming militia and saying they are terrible *Cough* fatman *cough*
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
I don't know, if paras are bad then marines must be bad too. They aren't that different, just regular inf taught to attack from the air or sea.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
No, Marines are first class troops. Check out the entire Pacific theater and the siege of Odessa(I believe that was Russian marines).
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Any battle in the Crimean peninsula involved Russian Marines, but yes they were good troops. I still maintain they'd be as useful as Paras though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
I highly disagree.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
I highly disagree.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
*Sigh* I guess...comrade dave wrote:
Don't. Try and win an argument with ButterBallBill,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
Why do you think they are bad? You might be able to convince me.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
lol, yeah. Same as paras, only different use. The only real elite forces in WW2 were the SAS. Marines and paras were normal infantry, only better equipped and with extra training.
We don't think they're bad. We think they're as good as paras.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Why do you think they are bad?
Para were not well equipped, that is why so many died.Pablo22510 wrote:
only better equipped
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Marines are good, para are bad.Pablo22510 wrote:
We don't think they're bad. We think they're as good as paras.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
Why do you think they are bad?
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Wrong. They're both good.
No.Pablo22510 wrote:
Wrong. They're both good.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
I think Marines wouldn't work because unless they landed with their vehicles and heavy kit they were almost easily defeated. But idk maybe they might be good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
They would be good.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Bill, look up "Point du Hoc".