Funny thing happened. Found it hilarious...
I was being pestered by 6 enemy interceptors so I sent a B-17 to take out the airstrip he was flying from. He saw me coming and recalled.
It was going to be close. He was going to land just 20 seconds before the strike. As soon as his planes landed, he embarked them on trucks to get off the dot.
My bomber came in and was shot down by 6 transport trucks.
I'm still laughing. And before anyone says there were stealth units there, no, I had a scout close enough to see.
I think what happened was that your planes were so close to the enemy that they technically attacked the planes, as they in the the 5km damage range. That must have caused the death.
These are the type of things that make me want to gold the emu out of existence… things that make me want to shell money in order to win… wait a second.. is that what they want to happen?! 
CONSPIRACY THEORY!
Welcome to Game Theory-Carking the 6th wrote:
I think what happened was that your planes were so close to the enemy that they technically attacked the planes, as they in the the 5km damage range. That must have caused the death.These are the type of things that make me want to gold the emu out of existence… things that make me want to shell money in order to win… wait a second.. is that what they want to happen?!
CONSPIRACY THEORY!
Title: "The Call of War Conspiracy: A Game Theory by MatPat"
[INTRO]
MatPat: Greetings, theorists! Today, we're embarking on a thrilling journey into the heart of a conspiracy theory that's as strategic as it gets. Join me as we explore "The Call of War Conspiracy," where we delve into the mysteries behind those intriguingly close encounters with enemy planes in Bytro's WWII multiplayer grand strategy game, "Call of War."
[GAME THEORY]
MatPat: Picture this: You're deep into a high-stakes match in "Call of War," meticulously planning your moves on the battlefield. Suddenly, your planes come under attack, seemingly well beyond the enemy's damage range. Is it just a gaming glitch, or could there be a more calculated explanation?
MatPat: Here's the key to our theory—the infamous 5km damage range. In the world of game design, balance and mechanics are carefully crafted. But what if this fine line between safety and danger was intentionally blurred? Could it be that developers are pulling the strings to create these hair-raising moments?
MatPat: Let's consider this: Could "Call of War's" developers be subtly pushing players to the brink, making them feel the need to invest in in-game items or power-ups to avoid these heart-pounding close calls? Are they manipulating our emotions to fuel microtransactions?
MatPat: Take a moment to let this sink in. Is there a conspiracy lurking within the code of the game, designed to deplete our wallets? Is it all part of a master plan to get players to "shell out" money in pursuit of a competitive edge? It's time to investigate further and reveal the truth behind the Call of War Conspiracy!
[CONCLUSION]
MatPat: As with any good game theory, we must remember that this is speculative. But it's crucial to maintain a critical eye on the games we play and the mechanics that shape our experiences. Are they enhancing our enjoyment, or is there something deeper at play?
MatPat: So, theorists, what's your take on "The Call of War Conspiracy" in this WWII grand strategy game by Bytro? Does it hold water, or are we merely strategizing for fun? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and always remember, it's just a theory—a game theory! Thanks for joining me on this intriguing journey.
Jesus that is a frighteningly good script...Carking the 6th wrote:
Title: "The Call of War Conspiracy: A Game Theory by MatPat"[INTRO]
MatPat: Greetings, theorists! Today, we're embarking on a thrilling journey into the heart of a conspiracy theory that's as strategic as it gets. Join me as we explore "The Call of War Conspiracy," where we delve into the mysteries behind those intriguingly close encounters with enemy planes in Bytro's WWII multiplayer grand strategy game, "Call of War."
[GAME THEORY]
MatPat: Picture this: You're deep into a high-stakes match in "Call of War," meticulously planning your moves on the battlefield. Suddenly, your planes come under attack, seemingly well beyond the enemy's damage range. Is it just a gaming glitch, or could there be a more calculated explanation?
MatPat: Here's the key to our theory—the infamous 5km damage range. In the world of game design, balance and mechanics are carefully crafted. But what if this fine line between safety and danger was intentionally blurred? Could it be that developers are pulling the strings to create these hair-raising moments?
MatPat: Let's consider this: Could "Call of War's" developers be subtly pushing players to the brink, making them feel the need to invest in in-game items or power-ups to avoid these heart-pounding close calls? Are they manipulating our emotions to fuel microtransactions?
MatPat: Take a moment to let this sink in. Is there a conspiracy lurking within the code of the game, designed to deplete our wallets? Is it all part of a master plan to get players to "shell out" money in pursuit of a competitive edge? It's time to investigate further and reveal the truth behind the Call of War Conspiracy!
[CONCLUSION]
MatPat: As with any good game theory, we must remember that this is speculative. But it's crucial to maintain a critical eye on the games we play and the mechanics that shape our experiences. Are they enhancing our enjoyment, or is there something deeper at play?
MatPat: So, theorists, what's your take on "The Call of War Conspiracy" in this WWII grand strategy game by Bytro? Does it hold water, or are we merely strategizing for fun? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and always remember, it's just a theory—a game theory! Thanks for joining me on this intriguing journey.
Very scary… matpat is a robot?!!
OmgCarking the 6th wrote:
Very scary… matpat is a robot?!!
Please log in to post a reply.
