Nuclear rockets, whatever your still wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9EC3Gy6Nk
For those of you who have experienced the use of nukes in nuclear warfare, what are your thoughts, your experiences? Devastating? Average amount of kills per nuke? Less effective to nuke large concentrations of soldiers, or lower ones? Can the nuke hit armies on the move just as effectively as standstill? Hard or easy to shoot down nuclear bombers?
Please log in to post a reply.
Nuclear rockets, whatever your still wrong.
I agree with Dave. Better trust me, I am both a master and a VERY heavy nuke user.
And you just got proven wrong, lel.
Not really. Someone saying I am wrong and going against my experience does not mean they are correct.
Now, be gone foul beast!
>Rocket
>Missile
Two different things.
Meh. I still like nuclear missiles.
Too bad they wont be added to the game, I guess.
Back on topic!
The best nukes seem to be planes rather than missiles. They can move between strips quicker and have a longer range.
And then active player comes in with rockets and interceptors and blows up your bombers before they can take off.
Most players don't hit my nukes on the strip. They can be moved quickly too. Also, int aren't very good. Their range isn't big enough to hit planes far behind front line.
Patrolling interceptors.....
You can get around them easy. Also, there is a low chance of a nuke being shot down.
Any moving object at speed can be technically called a missile and last time I checked rockets moved at speed.kubickle wrote:
>Rocket>Missile
Two different things.
There are no missiles in the game.
You really are bad at reading, aren't you? You must be thinking of ICBMs.
It's like you think this is 2015.
It is...
Yeah, I don't think say, last I checked the game starts in 1935 and ends at 1955.
being out of context is so 2012.
being out of the time-frame is so 2012
Please log in to post a reply.