It does not cause problems for me either but I would just like to know how they combined the ground and air units.
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
I heard from YoungGun that the new 2v2 map has aircraft carriers. Can someone confirm this with screenshots? I can't seem to find a game that has this map yet...
Please log in to post a reply.
It does not cause problems for me either but I would just like to know how they combined the ground and air units.
I too was surprised when I saw it. but this is a minor detail. not looking at it - I liked the mapButter Ball Bill wrote:
It does not cause problems for me either but I would just like to know how they combined the ground and air units.
I liked the map too, but they shouldn't have released it. It has many problems and fixing them will take time, and this will slow the creation of the Asia map.
What I believe happened with the carriers was that the devs realised there were problems with them (they didn't appear in some games), so they outright removed them and will release them later on.
I agree Pablo. Although I would prefer a buggy CV than none.
No way. I prefer something that good and ready to go without bugs so I can use it properly. Bugs are pretty annoying. In Spanish there is a saying that says "Mejor solo que mal acompañado." It means that better alone than with bad company. It usually applies for people, but I also use it for things. Better nothing than something that doesn't workButter Ball Bill wrote:
Although I would prefer a buggy CV than none.

I'm playing as Germany at the moment and I thought the damaged buildings were to show recent occupation or something. The mixed up army units is like rummaging through my old box of airfix soldiers thoroughly annoying. Touching up on everybody else's points,I get the feeling the ACs were perhaps rushed into development after seeing the euphoria they were creating in the forums. However the map does leave a lot to be desired when I look at it. Damaged buildings, mismatched units, no f*cking aircraft carriers BUT, I do like the level of technical sophisitcation each side has and if one country didn't have a certain unit (BBs or strat bombers) then they are not included. It's the little things that downplay this map in my opinion.
Hahahahahahahahhaha. Quite true.
I'm gonna try remember this. Thanks bud.Pablo22510 wrote:
Mejor solo que mal acompañado
Why?
You and the Brit might win our match Pablo, the Italian bloke on my team tried to invade me...
I could be wrong, but I understand the problem is not aircraft carriers. along with aircraft carriers were other changes, I saw a large bug related to missiles. perhaps this was the reason for the cancellation of the patch
My Spanish teacher is gonna ask is if we learned any new Spanish while on our summer holidays so if I have a popular Spanish quote it will look like I give a damn and don't always day dream through the classes. No offense to your language or country, I quite like both. But even better are the women you colonised 
No shit?!comrade dave wrote:
You and the Brit might win our match Pablo, the Italian bloke on my team tried to invade me...
Do you have any more details?Sandevot wrote:
I could be wrong, but I understand the problem is not aircraft carriers. along with aircraft carriers were other changes, I saw a large bug related to missiles. perhaps this was the reason for the cancellation of the patch
Oh, so I just did your homework, kindaButter Ball Bill wrote:
My Spanish teacher is gonna ask is if we learned any new Spanish while on our summer holidays so if I have a popular Spanish quote it will look like I give a damn and don't always day dream through the classes. No offense to your language or country, I quite like both. But even better are the women you colonised
No offense taken, and you are a really messed up bastard.How lol?Pablo22510 wrote:
you are a really messed up bastard
You could have used google translate.
Google translate sucks, I have tried.
Anyway, this thread has lost its point I believe and is going OT. Should we try get back on topic or just chuck in the bin?
Chuck in the bin.
I think we've all pretty much talked this thread into the ground and we have our answer anyway, I'm fine to put it to bed.
Agreed.
And I do not know why you said that.Sandevot wrote:
I do not know why you are so very annoyingIISpikeII wrote:
Not to mention the chaos you get thrown into at the beginning: damaged buildings, scattered provinces across the map, mixed troops, etc. The map looks like somebody took a bunch of units from both sides, juggled them around, then threw them at the map.
Please log in to post a reply.