There is not a Panjim province added to the Historic World War map, instead it is part of the dharwar province India, while it should be a part of Portugal, there was a thread before on this, but no change was implemented.
that's your name . But I know it's a provience.Claudio von Panjim wrote:
There is not a Panjim province added to the Historic World War map, instead it is part of the dharwar province India, while it should be a part of Portugal, there was a thread before on this, but no change was implemented.
yeah that's my name, but it's also a province, so can you add a comment on this thread to support this issue.
I support Panjim. Because there's a reason
Also, in world of war and pacific conquest, Calcutta is a rural province in Bangladesh while it should be a urban province of British Odisha if not THE capital of British Odisha.
Why? Can you explainEmperor Im wrote:
Also, in world of war and pacific conquest, Calcutta is a rural province in Bangladesh while it should be a urban province of British Odisha if not THE capital of British Odisha.
If we talk specifically of British Odisha, we generally talk of the Odisha captured by the British East India Company. Calcutta is a city that has been a crucial trading hub in the east for India. The East India Company set Calcutta up as the base of their operations, and the city is one of the first true 'Metropolises' of India. This also was the administrative center for a pretty good while as wellClaudio von Panjim wrote:
Why? Can you explainEmperor Im wrote:
Also, in world of war and pacific conquest, Calcutta is a rural province in Bangladesh while it should be a urban province of British Odisha if not THE capital of British Odisha.
It was literally the capital of British India till the early 20th century.Claudio von Panjim wrote:
Why? Can you explainEmperor Im wrote:
Also, in world of war and pacific conquest, Calcutta is a rural province in Bangladesh while it should be a urban province of British Odisha if not THE capital of British Odisha.
I know it cuz I live there.
Let's not get out of topic, it's about panjim
Yeah, Sorry.Claudio von Panjim wrote:
Let's not get out of topic, it's about panjim
I support Panjim!
So it's final, type I support Panjim to support this thread.
Please log in to post a reply.
