Hey people!
What can i have against rockets?
I´m wondering if anti air units can handle with rockets, can someone help me?
Thanks!
Please log in to post a reply.
lvl 1 rockets can be handled with anti air, they will most likely damage what they are attacking regardless, but anti air helps. Lvl 2 rockets can't be shot down.
Best you can do is keep your units moving and I think Forced march in the minutes before/after the rocket hits seem to decrease damage taken.
Hum i see it, thanks a lot for the help!
Even if i upgrade my anti air unit, that will be useless, right?
Or even if i have airforce like interceptors in patrol mode in my cities, that can´t destroy the rocket? I´m saying that because i saw that rockets have 0 defense against air forces...
Interceptors are great against rockets. I would either send them patrolling, or attack it directly. 
Correct.Sir McSquiggles wrote:
Interceptors are great against rockets. I would either send them patrolling, or attack it directly.
But it's stupid that rocket fighters don't work. I think it is poorly worded, it makes it seem like the rocket fighter actually fights rockets. If I am to put my research into something that is fast, and very powerful, but not upgradable at all and has awful range, I want it to fight rockets that pass over the province that the rocket interceptor is patrolling.
If that made any sense.
It's a rocket fighter because it is powered by a rocket engine versus propelled fighters (interceptors) that are usually powered by a piston engine.purplepizza117 wrote:
But it's stupid that rocket fighters don't work. I think it is poorly worded, it makes it seem like the rocket fighter actually fights rockets. If I am to put my research into something that is fast, and very powerful, but not upgradable at all and has awful range, I want it to fight rockets that pass over the province that the rocket interceptor is patrolling.If that made any sense.
Yeah, but the point is it makes it look like it shoots down rockets, which is wrong. I'm un-sure if anti-rocket systems existed in WW2, infact I don't think they did. But I suppose it'd be fair to be able to counter a rocket with a rocket, but it's not like rockets do much damage to units overall.wildL wrote:
It's a rocket fighter because it is powered by a rocket engine versus propelled fighters (interceptors) that are usually powered by a piston engine.purplepizza117 wrote:
But it's stupid that rocket fighters don't work. I think it is poorly worded, it makes it seem like the rocket fighter actually fights rockets. If I am to put my research into something that is fast, and very powerful, but not upgradable at all and has awful range, I want it to fight rockets that pass over the province that the rocket interceptor is patrolling.If that made any sense.
No, it doesn't make it seem like that.
It is a rocket fighter, as in rocket powered. Not a fighter that fights rockets. I understand it can be misinterpreted.
But when you know that rockets at lvl 2 or above can't be shot down it would make very, very little sense if you were able to make a fighter that could only attack lvl 1 rockets. That unit would be obsolete before it got out of the hangar.
First off, it's obsolete anyway... XD Second off, yes, I know it is rocket propelled instead of rocket fighting, but I think the name should be a little clearer- again.wildL wrote:
No, it doesn't make it seem like that.It is a rocket fighter, as in rocket powered. Not a fighter that fights rockets. I understand it can be misinterpreted.
But when you know that rockets at lvl 2 or above can't be shot down it would make very, very little sense if you were able to make a fighter that could only attack lvl 1 rockets. That unit would be obsolete before it got out of the hangar.
It would be called ANTI rocket fighter then
Lol reviving old threads.
Please log in to post a reply.
