I believe rockets don't follow moving units once launched. And then again, they don't deal much damage to units anyway.
28 Apr 2016, 19:45
The past is a foreign country.
Rockets
Wtf rockets can still hit me even if i am moving with forced march ? Anti stucture units are actualy anti everithing those rockets are so broken
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
16 Replies
28 Apr 2016, 20:27
I moved my units with forced march as soon they entered my line of sight , and i got dmg . losing like 50 troops in 20 mins , looks like quite a lot of dmg for me , dont u think ?
28 Apr 2016, 20:35
You sure it was only rockets? If so, how many?Funske wrote:
I moved my units with forced march as soon they entered my line of sight , and i got dmg . losing like 50 troops in 20 mins , looks like quite a lot of dmg for me , dont u think ?
The past is a foreign country.
28 Apr 2016, 20:49
Lvl 4 rockets , ~30 . They are quite easy to spam , since they need only 6 hrs , no upkeep , no oil
28 Apr 2016, 20:51
Ah, ok.
The past is a foreign country.
29 Apr 2016, 01:16
You have to get your own to punch out theirs. They are very easy to construct, to easy I think.Funske wrote:
Lvl 4 rockets , ~30 . They are quite easy to spam , since they need only 6 hrs , no upkeep , no oil
Carl Wilson
“Dad, how do soldiers killing each other solve the world's problems?”
― Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995: An Exhibition Catalogue
"Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: 'Do not march on Moscow'… Rule 2 is: 'Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
Bernard Law Montgomery, British general
“Dad, how do soldiers killing each other solve the world's problems?”
― Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995: An Exhibition Catalogue
"Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: 'Do not march on Moscow'… Rule 2 is: 'Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
Bernard Law Montgomery, British general
29 Apr 2016, 16:59
Indeed , the war turned into a rocket fight , its all about sneaking out rockets and destroyng airports
1 May 2016, 12:36
Just in response..
rockets are lethal..
cause a lot of damage to units as well..
but need to be used smartly..
use them on the offensive, and keep well protected
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
1 May 2016, 12:41
Nukes are better 
The past is a foreign country.
1 May 2016, 12:54
Id still take a pack of tac bombers over a nuke bomber!Pablo22510 wrote:
Nukes are better
but nukes still cause a punch
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
1 May 2016, 13:01
NEVER!!!oceanhawk wrote:
Id still take a pack of tac bombers over a nuke bomber!but nukes still cause a punch
The past is a foreign country.
3 May 2016, 21:14
I CHOOSE ROCKET!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
NEVER!!!oceanhawk wrote:
Id still take a pack of tac bombers over a nuke bomber!but nukes still cause a punch
Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
4 May 2016, 18:57
NUKES!Kehsct wrote:
I CHOOSE ROCKET!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
NEVER!!!oceanhawk wrote:
Id still take a pack of tac bombers over a nuke bomber!but nukes still cause a punch
The past is a foreign country.
4 May 2016, 19:12
NUCLEAR ROCKET!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
NUKES!Kehsct wrote:
I CHOOSE ROCKET!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
NEVER!!!oceanhawk wrote:
Id still take a pack of tac bombers over a nuke bomber!but nukes still cause a punch
Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
-Winston Churchill
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
-George S. Patton
4 May 2016, 19:13
YEAH!Kehsct wrote:
NUCLEAR ROCKET!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
NUKES!Kehsct wrote:
I CHOOSE ROCKET!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
NEVER!!!oceanhawk wrote:
Id still take a pack of tac bombers over a nuke bomber!but nukes still cause a punch
The past is a foreign country.
5 May 2016, 05:31
Hard choice. I'd take the bombers because they strike many times.
Carl Wilson
“Dad, how do soldiers killing each other solve the world's problems?”
― Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995: An Exhibition Catalogue
"Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: 'Do not march on Moscow'… Rule 2 is: 'Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
Bernard Law Montgomery, British general
“Dad, how do soldiers killing each other solve the world's problems?”
― Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995: An Exhibition Catalogue
"Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: 'Do not march on Moscow'… Rule 2 is: 'Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
Bernard Law Montgomery, British general
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
