You should gather some knowledge pertaining to information theory.
In order to comment on the use of spies, knowledge of statistics and administration is essential.
Lacking these knowledge, the discussion will be nonsense, merely an essay.
At the least, there are two types of information that can be obtained through intelligence activities: ( fragments ) β information β and β intelligence ,β and regardless of whether or not the β means β or βmethodsβ such as espionage are used, I think it is better that you should recognize that intelligence is obtained by connecting these fragment information together.
Intelligence is, by analogy, a finished painting.
And in this metaphor, it is not even mere pictures in progress that information that spies get, mere line segments.
But most beginners make a plan in the expectation that they will be able to draw a nice solid line in one shot.
And so do you.
You order the execution of the operation, convinced that 30 spies attacks will βnecessarilyβ destroy the airstrip, and βnecessarilyβ bring down the plane, so even βnecessarilyβ guarantee victory.
That is not strategy, also even operation.
That is baseless belief or faith.
And, at least in the current game system, even if correct intelligence is obtained from the fragmentary information provided by the spy, that intelligence is merely data in the form of a β still picture β.
Even if that still picture shows a moment that seems decisive, it does not guarantee that there is no fact before or after that moment that could shake our confidence.
