We got world at war, historical world war maps, etc....
Which of these tend to have the least rate of people going inactive in the first couple of days? Like many others I am annoyed with people leaving like that so knowing which map usually has the least of this problem would be nice.
Pacific usually has a good amount of players that stay in it.Kyrollous wrote:
We got world at war, historical world war maps, etc....Which of these tend to have the least rate of people going inactive in the first couple of days? Like many others I am annoyed with people leaving like that so knowing which map usually has the least of this problem would be nice.
The 100 player world map, simply because it starts with more players, so enough remain to make it interesting.
100p map usually has 20-30 active players at the beginningKyrollous wrote:
We got world at war, historical world war maps, etc....Which of these tend to have the least rate of people going inactive in the first couple of days? Like many others I am annoyed with people leaving like that so knowing which map usually has the least of this problem would be nice.
more player mean more chance to find active player
small maps mostly disappointing , you are waiting 20-30 days to reach high technology and you cant use them because there is no active player on map
small maps are finished in 10-14 daysUndaunted wrote:
100p map usually has 20-30 active players at the beginningKyrollous wrote:
We got world at war, historical world war maps, etc....Which of these tend to have the least rate of people going inactive in the first couple of days? Like many others I am annoyed with people leaving like that so knowing which map usually has the least of this problem would be nice.
more player mean more chance to find active player
small maps mostly disappointing , you are waiting 20-30 days to reach high technology and you cant use them because there is no active player on map
it is still boring , wait weeks to get new units and your opponent is 8 levelGen. Smit wrote:
small maps are finished in 10-14 daysUndaunted wrote:
100p map usually has 20-30 active players at the beginningmore player mean more chance to find active playerKyrollous wrote:
nWe got world at war, historical world war maps, etc....Which of these tend to have the least rate of people going inactive in the first couple of days? Like many others I am annoyed with people leaving like that so knowing which map usually has the least of this problem would be nice.
small maps mostly disappointing , you are waiting 20-30 days to reach high technology and you cant use them because there is no active player on map
Use the spectate option and promise yourself not to ally with the other high level in the gameUndaunted wrote:
it is still boring , wait weeks to get new units and your opponent is 8 levelGen. Smit wrote:
small maps are finished in 10-14 daysUndaunted wrote:
100p map usually has 20-30 active players at the beginningmore player mean more chance to find active playerKyrollous wrote:
nWe got world at war, historical world war maps, etc....Which of these tend to have the least rate of people going inactive in the first couple of days? Like many others I am annoyed with people leaving like that so knowing which map usually has the least of this problem would be nice.
small maps mostly disappointing , you are waiting 20-30 days to reach high technology and you cant use them because there is no active player on map
In this way there sometimes few games with strong(er) resistance, but yeah you may also encounter a well oiled alliance team, or group of friends.
Please log in to post a reply.
