im sure it would be nice, but surely we should let people choose available countries first? theres no landswap, sooCarking the 6th wrote:
It would be simply unnoble to do such a thing. Someone needs to RP the creation of the Bob Semple!
1939 HWW RP ‘chit-chat’
This thread is for everyone who wants to chat about the upcoming 1939 HWW RP. This is to prevent spam on the applications thread, which may discourage new applicants.
Use the following thread for official applications:
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
70 Replies
Of course, but that Australian player better make a move…
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
That's what I meant, sorry for not being very clear.SamPGS_17 wrote:
Yes, that’s the plan anyway. They should be UK colonies and do what the UK says. It’s alt historical RP, so we start off with all 1939 alliances.Zaktty wrote:
That's agreeable, but Canada, Australia, South Africa and India should start in alliance with the UK. Fair?SamPGS_17 wrote:
Disagree. You can have a lot of rules for RP, without forcing stuff. You can simulate civil war in India, for example, by allowing the USSR to send 10 units to fight in India. You can also RP a rebellion against the British Empire in South Africa, and the UK will have to decide whether they want to fight to keep it or let it go.This will work.Zaktty wrote:
Yeah, don't worry about that. But if we don't have some set things, then it won't be much different to an active HWW, which is fun, but not an RP.SamPGS_17 wrote:
There will be no land swap.Zaktty wrote:
And that there is a clear introduction on the newspaper, and landswap so no-one looses interestOh, and I do want to help with this RP. Despite what I said. But I won’t burn myself out, don’t worry
Carking the 6th wrote:
I’d say we allow Australia to invade New Zealand for example, make them the Oceanian colonies.
SamPGS_17 wrote:
Don’t agree, not historical really. There shouldn’t be any need for land swap at all. If Australia decides to go against their long-standing ally and declare war on New Zealand as part of the RP, by all means do that. I also expect Australia to be at war with the Netherlands. But it isn’t necessary to have any arbitrary landswap period or anything like this - it’s all set up for us!Carking the 6th wrote:
I’d say we allow Australia to invade New Zealand for example, make them the Oceanian colonies.
Carking the 6th wrote:
Well New Zealand will be useless and do nothing otherwise. Might as well let someone RP for them…
SamPGS_17 wrote:
it’s HWW, so they’re AI? It’ll act like any other AI country. Some countries are just irrelevantCarking the 6th wrote:
Well New Zealand will be useless and do nothing otherwise. Might as well let someone RP for them…
Carking the 6th wrote:
It would be simply unnoble to do such a thing. Someone needs to RP the creation of the Bob Semple!
SamPGS_17 wrote:
im sure it would be nice, but surely we should let people choose available countries first? theres no landswap, sooCarking the 6th wrote:
It would be simply unnoble to do such a thing. Someone needs to RP the creation of the Bob Semple!
Carking the 6th wrote:
Of course, but that Australian player better make a move
In the grand scheme of things, New Zealand is pretty irrelevant, which is a shame, because they should replace British Egypt with NZ in my opinion, since BE didn't exist, but I do think they should be roleplayed.
However, as Sam said it is all set up for us, so landswap seems unnecessary, but then again we need to do something about Egypt, so there might be a landswap anyway.
I’m sure the Anzac’s who helped save Egypt would agree with you 
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
I go to ANZAC Day every year in London, despite not having any Aussie or Kiwi relatives.
I have turkish neighbours.
Why @KaiserOfAnonymous shouldn't take Mongolia:
-You are sandwiched between Carking and SamPGS
- Tuva Tota is the only place you can expand into without aggravating a major power
- Even if you do manage to expand, Fox Company is Tibet
Please be someone more important! Even Persia would be a better choice, then you could do all your dystopian RP stuff!
Zaktty wrote:
Please be someone more important! Even Persia would be a better choice, then you could do all your dystopian RP stuff!

Go for it then Claudio.
This forum ain't big enough for two dictators.....Claudio NVKP wrote:
Zaktty wrote:
Please be someone more important! Even Persia would be a better choice, then you could do all your dystopian RP stuff!
Carking, grab the popcorn!
Here!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
So, of course, I'm new here, so what exactly is an RP and what are the rules?
Talvisota of the Abrahamic Caliphate
a RP is a game where you roleplay as a nation(Leader) with realistic actions in the game.
RPs are done through newspaper
Example:
Rise to power of [NAME]
HE rises to power after a great purge done on the government..
But of courses it must be longer, the example is short because I am super tired
So for example if you were playing as Germany you wouldn't be allowed to go for a defensive strategy because that's unrealistic?
Talvisota of the Abrahamic Caliphate
No, not like that. It’s just that your actions will be regulated more, so you cant declare war on 12 countries with no justification and stuff like that. Diplomacy and role playing your country and events within it become much more important here
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Ok I'm beginning to understand it... I'm sure I'll get the hang of it.
Talvisota of the Abrahamic Caliphate
You can
It's alternate history, though it need to be realistic and detailed.
About the rules. there are rules like war justification, declaring war after 12 hours (War declaration in Newspaper first).
1-2 years not going to war after signing peace treaty.
Not using golds and boosters.
Units cap, technology cap.
etc...
Not sure if we will have a tech cap here. Just blueprints.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
