LegendTheZhukov wrote:
If anyone wants to argue about Oct. 7th, valid. Defend israel's bombardment, stay out of range of my fists. That's my position
Claudio is not the president
INTRODUCING:FORUMS POLICE DEPARTMENT(FPD)
I'm announcing myself as the head of the police department. I've noticed several people spamming likes(Genzing) on other people's profiles, this is being done to annoy people, I'm against it. The FPD will be a government organization and its main goal will be stop stalkers and femboys, report troll accounts on forums and get them down.This isn't a private army!
IMPORTANT
JOIN NOW!
To register as a member of FPD, all you have to do is to write #FPDisCool in this thread and tag me. You will be given a position based on your points, promotions will happen. I will release the ranks soon.
Please log in to post a reply.
LegendTheZhukov wrote:
If anyone wants to argue about Oct. 7th, valid. Defend israel's bombardment, stay out of range of my fists. That's my position
Claudio is not the president
Claudio lost!
No. Claudio didnt lose, you just survived a vote of non-confidence which wasnt even done properly. I dont know why it had to be over 10 votes. First past the post is used for elections not votes of no confidence. It should have been that over half of the people voting should have voted against you.Zaktty wrote:
Claudio lost!
OH MY GOD STOP YAPPINGnoblebright wrote:
No. Claudio didnt lose, you just survived a vote of non-confidence which wasnt even done properly. I dont know why it had to be over 10 votes. First past the post is used for elections not votes of no confidence. It should have been that over half of the people voting should have voted against you.Zaktty wrote:
Claudio lost!
If we did that you still would have lost as me, Talvisota, Zhukov, Rokossovski make up just some of the over 10 people who could have voted against or for, therefore you who only gained 3 would still have lost.noblebright wrote:
No. Claudio didnt lose, you just survived a vote of non-confidence which wasnt even done properly. I dont know why it had to be over 10 votes. First past the post is used for elections not votes of no confidence. It should have been that over half of the people voting should have voted against you.Zaktty wrote:
Claudio lost!
that's 4.
Still, you would lose.
Whatever you think?
So around a tie... This wasnt a fairly organsised vote though.Carking the 6th wrote:
If we did that you still would have lost as me, Talvisota, Zhukov, Rokossovski make up just some of the over 10 people who could have voted against or for, therefore you who only gained 3 would still have lost.noblebright wrote:
No. Claudio didnt lose, you just survived a vote of non-confidence which wasnt even done properly. I dont know why it had to be over 10 votes. First past the post is used for elections not votes of no confidence. It should have been that over half of the people voting should have voted against you.Zaktty wrote:
Claudio lost!
Probably...The Mister Class wrote:
Still, you would lose.
No, there were over 10 people who could have voted. You got 3/4 votes. You lost the majority. You lost no matter how you cut it.
Ok why have you guys done all this? I love you guys and only want to make u guys happy
. And I get this? A pedophile? Groomers? Really?
Genz is back

Everyone just jumped on the bandwagon.ComradeGenz wrote:
Ok why have you guys done all this? I love you guys and only want to make u guys happy. And I get this? A pedophile? Groomers? Really?
Stop saying things you know nothing about. You were not here when the reasons for Genz getting banned happened, you were not here even before the RP which makes you a weird candidate to plaster your support for a guy talking about how the forums used to be good all over the place, you were not here for the forum elections and yet you talk about them like you have a masters degree from Oxford about them (guess what, wasn't here for them either. Do I pretend to know everything about them? No) and you just take the viewpoint that you know will annoy everybody else. YOU are the one ruining this community.noblebright wrote:
Everyone just jumped on the bandwagon.ComradeGenz wrote:
Ok why have you guys done all this? I love you guys and only want to make u guys happy. And I get this? A pedophile? Groomers? Really?
Genz was never a pedophile though.
But he was a troll who got perma banned multiple times before, for from what youβve told me good reason.
That is what needs him banned, not woke 'grooming' things.Carking the 6th wrote:
But he was a troll who got perma banned multiple times before, for from what youβve told me good reason.
Okay... thats a fair enough reason... so why is he back.Carking the 6th wrote:
But he was a troll who got perma banned multiple times before, for from what youβve told me good reason.
Genz shouldn't be accused of being a pedo
Please log in to post a reply.