No confidence vote against Zaktty

NO CONFIDENCE VOTE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT

There have been disputes between Zaktty and Claudio after which Zaktty announced he was in favour of a non-confidence vote against his government. I summon the parliament here for the non confidence vote against his authority.

The rules and other crucial infos are:

i) The no-confidence vote would be held between 28th and 31st January, providing enough time to Zaktty.

ii)There needs to be 10 people to vote against his government and to make him resign.

iii) Any member can not switch their vote, once casted. Your first vote is your final vote.

iv)* The non-confidence vote is has started.

v) If 10 people vote against him, re-elections will be held.

vi)* Those who would not accept the mandate of this election will be banned from further election.

Who can vote?

The conditions to vote are:

i) Your account needs to be at least 45 days old.

ii) You should be a trusted member.

iii)You should not be associated with trolls.

Member Prohibited to vote:

  • San arta
  • Croatian kid(other such accounts)
  • Tel aviv
  • Addin turx
As you can see, most trolls are banned from voting, I am not supposed to vote because I'm the organizer. This list can extend.

IMPORTANT: THE NON-CONFIDENCE VOTE HAS STARTED, VOTE ONLY IF YOU ARE AGAINST ZAKTTY'S GOVERNMENT AND HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THEM. VOTING WILL BE OPEN FOR THE NEXT 72 HOURS(TILL 31st)

Please do not chat unnecessarily on this thread, keep it as clean as you can. You may suggest more rules which can eliminate any chance of cheating. More information will be announced before the final vote.

Thank you,

Forums Election Manager, Joe Bartolozzi.

ˌ

"We can be wrong, or we can know it, but we can't do both at the same time." ~ Heisenberg
RETIRED ELECTION MANAGER

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

197 Replies

Do not vote for Zaktty! I am a better PM!

The President

Both of you aren’t the best Pm

Oh really?

The President
  • But I will consider

Inform people about this thread.

"We can be wrong, or we can know it, but we can't do both at the same time." ~ Heisenberg
RETIRED ELECTION MANAGER

Yes

I vote for zaktty

Glory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command

Claudio is getting mine

Zaktty has my vote.


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

wait for 28th and then vote. your votes won't be counted yet.

"We can be wrong, or we can know it, but we can't do both at the same time." ~ Heisenberg
RETIRED ELECTION MANAGER

So do you mean that if we don't have confidence in Zakkty, we automatically vote for Claudio?! This single clause makes me give a no-confidence vote to the election committee.

When the enemy is driven back, we have failed. When he is cut off, encircled and dispersed, we have succeeded.
- Alexander Suvorov.

TheZhukov wrote:

I vote for zaktty

Carking the 6th wrote:

Zaktty has my vote.
Zaktty hasn't done anything in office in any forum position , I have solved Genzing within days of being appointed in a role. There's no reason to vote Zaktty for the betterment of the forum. I am better and more experienced, I have won an election, but Zaktty is un elected.
The President

K.Rokossovski wrote:

So do you mean that if we don't have confidence in Zakkty, we automatically vote for Claudio?! This single clause makes me give a no-confidence vote to the election committee.
Well, this is a vote of no confidence, not a new election.
The President

K.Rokossovski wrote:

So do you mean that if we don't have confidence in Zakkty, we automatically vote for Claudio?! This single clause makes me give a no-confidence vote to the election committee.
I agree and since Zhukov or Donk, my designated successors didn't succeed me, this should be treated as a vote of no confidence in the government, not the president, meaning that if parliament no longer has confidence in the president it will trigger an election, the issue with this, however, is that people may vote "not confident" so they can run for office themselves.

I also suggest it should require 10 people to not have confidence, rather than the current system.

Literally anything that ends with Claudio not being president is what I side with.


CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

Carking the 6th wrote:

Literally anything that ends with Claudio not being president is what I side with.
What is that you have against me?
The President

Carking the 6th wrote:

Literally anything that ends with Claudio not being president is what I side with.
Why steal his picture? If it is a joke, the beard is a thousand yards long... so I have to assume it is some sort of vindictious thing. Why be like that? why do you hate him so much? Really, pick your own pfp, it tells us SO much about you to steal it.
When the enemy is driven back, we have failed. When he is cut off, encircled and dispersed, we have succeeded.
- Alexander Suvorov.

K.Rokossovski wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Literally anything that ends with Claudio not being president is what I side with.
Why steal his picture? If it is a joke, the beard is a thousand yards long... so I have to assume it is some sort of vindictious thing. Why be like that? why do you hate him so much? Really, pick your own pfp, it tells us SO much about you to steal it.
Chill out, they have the same pfp because it's the Claudio cult.

Anyway, Zaktty is the true eternal forum president.

"Imma play CoW to calm down" - Literally nobody ever
Talvisota of the Abrahamic Caliphate

That is a stupid thing to say. It is easy to distinguish people when they talk from their own turf... stealing pfp's makes us want to READ every time we want to read them, like who is saying what? It is a really stupid thing to do to make us wonder about that all the time, like we have to be extra-careful about who says what... do they want that? Do they WANT us to be wrong-footed? It is a very easy thing for us, not involved in the day-to-day intrigues of the forum... Claudio is talking, 6th is talking. But somehow these guys don't want it to be easy? They want some ambiguity about that? They want us to be confused about who says what?

Really, 6th, get yourself a cool pic and don't make us feel like Claudio is talking when he isn't.

When the enemy is driven back, we have failed. When he is cut off, encircled and dispersed, we have succeeded.
- Alexander Suvorov.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Roleplaying
Quick Launch