NO CONFIDENCE VOTE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
There have been disputes between Zaktty and Claudio after which Zaktty announced he was in favour of a non-confidence vote against his government. I summon the parliament here for the non confidence vote against his authority.
The rules and other crucial infos are:
i) The no-confidence vote would be held between 28th and 31st January, providing enough time to Zaktty.
ii)There needs to be 10 people to vote against his government and to make him resign.
iii) Any member can not switch their vote, once casted. Your first vote is your final vote.
iv)* The non-confidence vote is has started.
v) If 10 people vote against him, re-elections will be held.
vi)* Those who would not accept the mandate of this election will be banned from further election.
Who can vote?
The conditions to vote are:
i) Your account needs to be at least 45 days old.
ii) You should be a trusted member.
iii)You should not be associated with trolls.
Member Prohibited to vote:
IMPORTANT: THE NON-CONFIDENCE VOTE HAS STARTED, VOTE ONLY IF YOU ARE AGAINST ZAKTTY'S GOVERNMENT AND HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THEM. VOTING WILL BE OPEN FOR THE NEXT 72 HOURS(TILL 31st)
Please do not chat unnecessarily on this thread, keep it as clean as you can. You may suggest more rules which can eliminate any chance of cheating. More information will be announced before the final vote.
Thank you,
Forums Election Manager, Joe Bartolozzi.
Λ
Please log in to post a reply.
It seems Walruses can now fly.
Does he even know anything about this or how it works? You are just bringing random people in! Let them make their own choice!Claudio NVKP wrote:
And, @Komrade Khrushchev will vote against zaktty too.
I'm bringing in these people, they see the thread, they vote against Zaktty. Simple. How will they know about this if I don't bring them in.
The people who want to vote will vote, people who do not want to do not need to be pressured into voting for a particular side (let alone at all) in public.
I'm stating people who'll vote against Zaktty. Any problem with that?
Kruschev has barely even showed up on any of these threads, so
applies here. You can bring in people, but donβt assume their vote! So yes, I do have a problem with that.Talvisota wrote:
The people who want to vote will vote, people who do not want to do not need to be pressured into voting for a particular side (let alone at all) in public.
Yes, because now you're basically making a mandate for them to do so, giving them little to no choice due to peer pressure.Claudio NVKP wrote:
I'm stating people who'll vote against Zaktty. Any problem with that?
Uhm, Khrushchev is my party peer, of course he will, it's like saying, how dare you assume I'll breathe air in 15 minutes.
So currently we have, noblebright, Talvisota, Khrushchev, me. Which makes it 4. Throw Zhukov in there and 5.
Was. So was Zaktty.
Talvisota and Kruschev havenβt even voted yetβ¦ you shall see!Claudio NVKP wrote:
So currently we have, noblebright, Talvisota, Khrushchev, me. Which makes it 4. Throw Zhukov in there and 5.
No, it was a coalition government, which made him a VP. He was never a member of my party. Khrushchev is still my party peer.Carking the 6th wrote:
Was. So was Zaktty.
Meh, Semantics.
See, whatever personal hatred you may have, cannot co relate to the forum. You must oust zaktty. I am a far better option.
Thatβs where you are wrong. Zaktty is far more reasonable and a better leader. He knows when to be decisive and to compromise. His leadership in this last RP is an excellent example.
I vote for Zaktty.
See, that's wrong, the RP is different, he may handle the RP good, but he will never be on point at handling the forum, which he is failing. I have done many things, as listed in my speech for the forums.Carking the 6th wrote:
Thatβs where you are wrong. Zaktty is far more reasonable and a better leader. He knows when to be decisive and to compromise. His leadership in this last RP is an excellent example.
You are technically not allowed to do that since you're literally running as my VP.Talvisota wrote:
I vote for Zaktty.
Well, I am still not technically the VP therefore I can do what I want
Well, if you vote Zaktty then you're obviously not being VP. Unnoble.
Other than Genz, which was mostly just AKU dealing with it after learning about the issue, you havenβt done much at all. While Zaktty hasnβt made much changes, heβs barely had enough time! Havenβt you seen those census threads gathering information to actually help the people? The decrees and cabinets? You did nothing in your short stay, Claudio. You would rather combat your rivals in the forums than work with them. Youβll run things with an iron fist, starting a civil war.
See, rather than starting e 'revolution' before I even do anything, you have annoyed me to resignation. And Akku wouldn't have dealt with genz, if I hadn't brought it to the attention. Zaktty hasn't done anything, he has got A LOT of time to do something. 3 months. Also, before Genzing I have done a lot too. Check the speech.
I am more active than Zaktty, more experienced.
Please log in to post a reply.
