Indeed
What year to start in Alternate 1914
What year should the roleplay start in? I originally thought to make it 1914 without the say of the people, but I decieded to try my hand in democracy.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
171 Replies
You are 100% right economically, but counting generals and that more subjective category, the First French Empire and Imperial Germany were definitely more powerful than Britain. Once the UK committed it still took many coalitions and a lot of effort to take down France. And in WW1, the German army was significantly stronger, while their fleet was rapidly growing in a close second (Anglo-German naval arms race). I also think the US overtook Britain in the 20βs, their massive economic power made it so that when the U.S. would inevitably use its industry, it would rapidly become the most powerful force on Earth (which it did when japan made a mistake).SamPGS_17 wrote:
Not against napoleon - they just didnβt have enough interests there. Napoleon was an insanely good general - with anyone else, the British would just win by default. Essentially the first french revolutionary war was won by napoleon because there was no solid coalition against them, and the British didnβt commit enough. Perhaps youβre right but I would argue for britain being stronger.Carking the 6th wrote:
Germany was definitely more powerful. They managed to defeat Russia, and almost break France a Britain at the same time, while having to prop up their useless allies. Had this been Germany alone VS. France and Russia, I think they would have won.Still, it took a coalition to bring them down. The UK alone probably was weaker. At least until after 1812.SamPGS_17 wrote:
Perhaps⦠but they knuckled down essentially after 1801, to form a formal coalition to defeat napoleon. They were certainly the richest nation, and could use that to their advantage, and did.Carking the 6th wrote:
Thatβs somewhat debatable at first, since their poorly drilled and some land force at the start really weighed down their navy, allowing dance with a great navy and super strong army to beat UK with a decent army and Super strong navy. As they grew in size and training though, combined with their performance against a major rebellion and 3 world powers, Iβd be inclined to agree. They remained the stringers military up until Napoleon.SamPGS_17 wrote:
Ah I meant military in general. I always do that. Britain had the strongest military overallβ¦in any case, britain were the undisputed strongest power until around the 1930s
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
They got Oppenheimer
Technological development, colonization, fun 20th century antics!Kadeko wrote:
I myself have no idea what's happening exactly in those years other than wars...If I were to choose without considering without knowing the history of that years, I'll consider myself a spectator...
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Thatβs literally world history in a nutshell
Fun 20th century antics? Colonization?
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Yes
Nah.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Unnoble
The Saviour @Claudio NVKP would disagree. The Indian colonization of Panjim was not based.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
What about the second battle of sunny town was that based?
Of course! Sure some accidents caused a few war crimes but Panjim won and made up for it!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
-takes note of war crimes- what else?
I meant war crimes as in capturing criminals during the battle!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Sure 
Exactly! They then sent those POLISH HEATHENS TO HELL
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Yeah Iβm going to have to report you to the UN
What are they gonna do? Cry about the Geneva suggestions?
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
No Iβm going to make you listen to a song
Do it. I dare you.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.