World War 2 Roleplay - Applications & Questions

SamPGS_17 wrote:

As for joining yourself, what country did you have in mind?

SADRA_ready wrote:

Zaktty wrote:

docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…D4Bg/viewform?usp=sf_link

I just finished reading that poll and wanted to say somethingpeace after declare war is good but to be honest i think 24hr is a lot. at 24hr defender country have opportunity to move all of his units to border provinces and defend at their easily. Since the difference for of time zone (night and morning) for player is about 12hr or less i think its better to change it to 12hrabout planes and naval units kill i think kill planes immediately without permission should be allow but about naval units must be 6hr because some seas have only 1 dot( Of course, you can sink earlier, but this will be a direct declaration of war)

about units RRG and nuclear bomb better to not allow but nuke bomber should be allow but as real life for example USA can build after day 25 then Russia can build from day 33 Uk from day 39 and France from day 55 and China/Japan from day 63 (i started from day 25:1945 then assumed 2 days each year so Russia had nuke at 1949 4year*2=8 this mean they can have it after 8 days)also better to limit it

USA :day 25 2nuke or less

day 32 4 nuke or less

day 39 6 nuke or less

day 46 8 nuke or less

day 51 10 nuke or less

after day 65 12 nuke or less

for example this means if USA make 3 nuke at day 31 its broke the rules

Russia :day 33 1 nuke or nothing

day 40 3 nuke or less

day 47 6 nuke or less

day 52 8 nuke or less

day 66 10 nuke or less

UK :day 39 1 nuke or nothing

day 46 3 nuke or less

day 51 5 nuke or less

after day 65 6 nuke or less

I will complete it in part 2

I like your points about nukes, however, while I agree with the dates that they should be allowed for certain countries, in alternate history certain nations may get nukes faster than normal, e.g. if China is united earlier, then they can make nukes faster if the UK is safe from attack and has more resources, they would not need to include the USA in their research.

As for the caps on the number of nuclear bombs, after discovery, countries built more nukes in shorter time, so I feel like after the number of days you suggested, we should square the number, e.g. after day 32, 2 squared would be 4, so 4 nukes allowed, by day 39, 2 cubed is 8, etc.

Your point on peace after war declaration is spot-on, I think we should reduce it to 12 hours.

In part 2, I agree with what you say about rocket artillery, however, due to the large amounts of units players will make, the number of rocket fires allowed will be higher than 10.

Reducing nukes to certain countries may not work out. What if China manages to subjugate all of Asia, while France gets their ass kicked by Germany and the UK. They still get nukes earlier? Just hold it all back to 1943 (allow research by then, it would take 2 more days until 1944 for nukes to be researched, and then 2 more to get it built in 1945).

when will rules come out

SamPGS_17 wrote:

@SADRA_ready

Thank you for your input, we will consider it carefully as moderators before releasing the rules and a final date for when the RP will start.

As for joining yourself, what country did you have in mind?

Carking the 6th wrote:

SamPGS_17 wrote:

@SADRA_ready

Thank you for your input, we will consider it carefully as moderators before releasing the rules and a final date for when the RP will start.

As for joining yourself, what country did you have in mind?

If you had any doubts I think they are worth the trust. I’ll vouch for them as needed.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Reducing nukes to certain countries may not work out. What if China manages to subjugate all of Asia, while France gets their ass kicked by Germany and the UK. They still get nukes earlier? Just hold it all back to 1943 (allow research by then, it would take 2 more days until 1944 for nukes to be researched, and then 2 more to get it built in 1945).

we can allow nuke for all countries but like real world

1.USA 2.Soviet 3.UK 4.France 5.china/Japan 6.british India and ...

but Tibet and Xinjiang now are a part of China and they can have it too

also if I'm not wrong Turkey Germany Italy and Netherlands have nuke bomb as a part of NATO but they are limited a lot

Iran(persia) has own nuclear program

Canada was at US nuke program and they can have it a bit after get independence from UK

Argentina from Germany and after few days from Germany can build it

at all I mean all countries can get nuke but some countries can get it earlier

and when dose Venezuela and Cuba get nukes?

Zaktty wrote:

Ok Sadra, you can be Persia. Thank you for your feedback.

Zaktty wrote:

I like your points about nukes, however, while I agree with the dates that they should be allowed for certain countries, in alternate history certain nations may get nukes faster than normal, e.g. if China is united earlier, then they can make nukes faster if the UK is safe from attack and has more resources, they would not need to include the USA in their research.

As for the caps on the number of nuclear bombs, after discovery, countries built more nukes in shorter time, so I feel like after the number of days you suggested, we should square the number, e.g. after day 32, 2 squared would be 4, so 4 nukes allowed, by day 39, 2 cubed is 8, etc.

Zaktty wrote:

In part 2, I agree with what you say about rocket artillery, however, due to the large amounts of units players will make, the number of rocket fires allowed will be higher than 10.

for example if only 20% or 30% of Airforce or army can be rocket fighters

the percentages are just examples, you can put any percentage

We already agreed to no ratios.

SADRA_ready wrote:

Carking the 6th wrote:

Reducing nukes to certain countries may not work out. What if China manages to subjugate all of Asia, while France gets their ass kicked by Germany and the UK. They still get nukes earlier? Just hold it all back to 1943 (allow research by then, it would take 2 more days until 1944 for nukes to be researched, and then 2 more to get it built in 1945).

truewe can allow nuke for all countries but like real world

1.USA 2.Soviet 3.UK 4.France 5.china/Japan 6.british India and ...

but Tibet and Xinjiang now are a part of China and they can have it too

also if I'm not wrong Turkey Germany Italy and Netherlands have nuke bomb as a part of NATO but they are limited a lot

Iran(persia) has own nuclear program

Canada was at US nuke program and they can have it a bit after get independence from UK

Argentina from Germany and after few days from Germany can build it

at all I mean all countries can get nuke but some countries can get it earlier

but did they MAKE it

make then test

I might join this. My first choice would be Venezuela, but Peru would be OK I guess.

Unfortunately my gold supply is quite low so I might not be able to join within a time frame that works for everyone else.

Peru's Axis right? I've been wanting to play as Axis for a while, since my low opinion of it is unsubstantiated by any first-hand experience and I'd like to rectify that before I let myself get embroiled in arguments about which doctrines are the best again.

I have got the gold

Lady Aragosta wrote:

I might join this. My first choice would be Venezuela, but Peru would be OK I guess.

Unfortunately my gold supply is quite low so I might not be able to join within a time frame that works for everyone else.

Peru's Axis right? I've been wanting to play as Axis for a while, since my low opinion of it is unsubstantiated by any first-hand experience and I'd like to rectify that before I let myself get embroiled in arguments about which doctrines are the best again.

Just need South Africa, and then we can begin.

I doubt anyone wants to be Tibet or Xinjiang

Lady Aragosta wrote:

I might join this. My first choice would be Venezuela, but Peru would be OK I guess.

Unfortunately my gold supply is quite low so I might not be able to join within a time frame that works for everyone else.

Peru's Axis right? I've been wanting to play as Axis for a while, since my low opinion of it is unsubstantiated by any first-hand experience and I'd like to rectify that before I let myself get embroiled in arguments about which doctrines are the best again.

Zaktty wrote:

Lady Aragosta wrote:

I might join this. My first choice would be Venezuela, but Peru would be OK I guess.

Unfortunately my gold supply is quite low so I might not be able to join within a time frame that works for everyone else.

Peru's Axis right? I've been wanting to play as Axis for a while, since my low opinion of it is unsubstantiated by any first-hand experience and I'd like to rectify that before I let myself get embroiled in arguments about which doctrines are the best again.

I'll put you down for Peru for now, I am sorry you couldn't play someone more major, as I thought it would be really cool if you joined.

Just need South Africa, and then we can begin.

I doubt anyone wants to be Tibet or Xinjiang

Does @ChessSamurai1999 still not want in for like South Africa or something?

Zaktty wrote:

I'll put you down for Peru for now, I am sorry you couldn't play someone more major, as I thought it would be really cool if you joined.

Also last time I played a major I stuffed up mightily.

_{*An? A? Does everyone here mentally pronounce it as the abbreviation 'are-pee' or the full word/s 'roleplay'?}

If you wanted to avoid such a problem it’s best to consistently spell it out as Roleplay to save your brain the suffering. Considering that you wouldn’t gain any mental break from shortening it due to this conundrum it only makes sense.

Fair. This is probably the first time I've actually typed it out, and in real life I usually say 'RP' rather than 'roleplay'.