In the 100 player game I am in, its 4 countries whom have banded together against 7. Since we are all sending waves of counter attacks at each other I am paying the price of -25 morale for 7 or more countries I am war with. In the large games, I don't think this should even be calculated. In the smaller games, it makes sense in that you finish what you started attacking, or if you bite off too much you're going to have to sustain it. I can understand all the other morale modifiers, but not the number of countries at war with. That or cap it at -10, because out of 5 invasions, all I have been able to do is help bomb the landing forces. My newly captured territories begin with -75 now, I have to wait for the rebellion before moving on.
Please log in to post a reply.
I know this is a little late, but the smartphone isn't THAT bad... okay, yeah, it is. But what are you gonna do?Azkazan wrote:
I tried the smartphone once, I don't think I even managed to move somthing, so I have to admire you for that one.
iPhone S5 screen is too small. It gets so clogged with the various items on the screen, that you cant really put your fingers anywhere inbetween. It is THAT bad... On my wife's Samsung S6 Edge, however, it is a lot better, but still just barely doable. That is: build orders etc. A fight is impossiblepurplepizza117 wrote:
but the smartphone isn't THAT bad
I use my tablet often for Call of War when I'm on the move. It is better than smartphone at least!_Pontus_ wrote:
A fight is impossible
Back to the topic:
started as Indochina
26xx VP
Owning ... well see map
Currently at peace with everyone, due to worldwide Christmas-Peace-Pact.
Moved capital to somewhere central in Eurasia, losing moral on cores (Southeast Asia/Indochina) despite lvl5 fortresses, but still increasing overall production. North America ofc having lowest morale, but all provinces turning up a profit. No food issues (positive 253/hr)
Morale is an issue, but without that issue, there is nothing to stop unbridled expansion, especially not since the food-fix.
I like how Benchuanaland owns southern Africa, Libya owns the north, South Argentina controls east of South America, and Asia is split between West Yakutia, Manchukuo, you (Indochina), and South China.
Australia is too split up to do anything major... (between Sumatra and South India, it looks like!) North America is basically ruled by you (Indochina) but Northwest USA it looks like still rules a good portion of it.
It is safe to say that unless you are coalition-ed, you shall win that match.
Indeed Africa and South America is well split between the 2 respective players.
The rest of the world is owned by the Asian Alliance.
But actually, southern east USA is British Odisha, who received that part (and partly conquered it) in compensation for losses elsewhere during the 'Big War' , when he got invaded from Africa via India and lost the larger part of his mainland, which stretched from India to the Saudi peninsula.
West Yakutia covered the north east flank vs previous nr1 Texas and invaded there with me (Texas owned N America & allied with southern Americas; but is gone now), but was forced to pull back due to surprise attack by Texas on his mainland, which we stopped in coop, but also stopped his advance in America.
The island empires fought bravely in the Pacific vs South Argentine and Peru, after conquering Australia and alike.
Manchukwo only lives because of his brave but fruitless efforts to support the Asian Alliance, being a complete noo/new-bie, and the fact that I never backstab an ally ever (unless going inactive).
Currently we are in a X-mas Peace Pact until the 4th of January.
How this will end is unclear yet. I am at some 2750 VP by tomorrow night, after mopping up the remainders of Southern China and Turkmenistan (both couldn't play anymore for various reasons).
Hence, no prey left in Pacific or Asia, since all played their roles loyally (which is not the same as effectively, clearly)
Benchuanaland is the only one that deserves to be destroyed still, for his inactive approach and unclear allegiances. The rest of the enemies fought hard and honorably for their - initially split - interests. But only Benchuanaland does not bring about the end of the map. So, we shall see where this leads us: peaceful resolution by transfer of points or again war in 2016.
Oh._Pontus_ wrote:
Actually, southern east USA is British Odisha, who received that part (and partly conquered it) in compensation for losses elsewhere during the 'Big War'
Yes, it is a bit weird 
Yeah, I can see that... LOL_Pontus_ wrote:
Yes, it is a bit weird
Benchuanaland is tricky in diplomacy, but military wise easy to take care off if he stands alone.
British odisha is pretty much done without his core, just take the rest of him, you already got his core provinces.
I don't think Australia is ever fully unified under one owner that I have seen.
And now you'll see it! Muahaha!mallahanjr wrote:
I don't think Australia is ever fully unified under one owner that I have seen.
Except that he is my ally, there is no problemAzkazan wrote:
British odisha is pretty much done without his core, just take the rest of him, you already got his core provinces.
Ain't gonna happen.
How'd you manage to get his cores?_Pontus_ wrote:
Except that he is my ally, there is no problemAzkazan wrote:
British odisha is pretty much done without his core, just take the rest of him, you already got his core provinces.
B-O was owning and defending south coast from India to Saudi
[/img]
[/img]
Finland orTexas suddenly made allies out of Libya and B-land and B-O got surprise invasion on India, while concentrated on Saudi front, where he just defeated Irak and Saudi. Lost his mainland, before we mounted a force to push them out again. Took a while to mount, since many troops were locked elsewhere in wars and also on their way to Texas (since Finland's frontline in Russia was crumbling, Texas was the obvious next target).
I see... such a complicated match sometimes. Texas was doing awesome!_Pontus_ wrote:
He was owning and defending south coast from India to Saudi
[/img]
Finland made allies out of Libya and B-land and B-O got surprise invasion on India, while concentrated on Saudi front, where he just defeated Irak and Saudi. Lost his mainland, before we mounted a force to push them out again. Took a while to mount, since many troops were locked elsewhere in wars and also on their way to Texas (since Finland's frontline in Russia was crumbling, Texas was the obvious next target)
Texas was King One-Eye in the land of the blind
As soon as the opposition formed:
BTW, these are South Chinese (northern central group) and B-O (southwestern group) expeditionary forces ripping through Texas. Hence, my gratitude towards B-O and I thus do not wipe him of the map.
Due to a map error at crossing from Eurasia into Alaska, West Yakutia and me were delayed with 3 days )northwest corner)
Actually, what killed Texas is becoming too big, too fast
Who played as Texas and who played as Finland?
Oh, I see. Too often have the Americas come under attack from foreign nations in my matches._Pontus_ wrote:
Texas was King One-Eye in the land of the blindAs soon as the opposition formed:
BTW, these are South Chinese (northern central group) and B-O (southwestern group) expeditionary forces ripping through Texas. Hence, my gratitude towards B-O and I thus do not wipe him of the map.
Due to a map error at crossing from Eurasia into Alaska, West Yakutia and me were delayed with 3 days )northwest corner)
Texas and Finland ...Azkazan wrote:
Who played as Texas and who played as Finland?
Please log in to post a reply.
