So I had an idea.
Wouldn't it be cool to have a Six Day's War Map?
It would be basically a HWW Map that only includes the Arab/Israeli region. The game would last six days. The Arab states would be all in a fixed coalition with each other, while Israel is completely on its own. The reason I suggest it like this is because:
A) Historical Accuracy
B) The Arab states will have mainly militia as their main force as it is Historically Based, whereas Israel will have a high-quality modern military made up of professional career soldiers not just from Israel, but also from the US, Germany, France, Britain, etc.
The game would start with Israel at war with everyone else on the map (being the United Arab Republic, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Kuwait, Egypt and Jordan). Israel wins if it has retained all of its land that it has at the start of the game, but it can conquer foreign territories. The Arab Coalition wins if they have not.
Most of the Arab States would be Axis doctrine, but they could be any doctrine depending on the government in place at the start of the Six Day's War. Meanwhile Israel is Allied, however we all know foreign aid played a huge role in this war. Any units at the start of the game that are there as a result of foreign aid would be given the doctrine of the country that they come from, while any units from Israel or produced in Israel will be given the Allied Doctrine.
As for the West Bank, it would start the game on 25% morale and qualify as a Non-Core province, whereas all other territories will start on 70% unless there is another province which was also won in battle, which I'm sure there are. And yes, Gaza will be a major city.
Each country will have 5 cities each.
One thing I would also like to have in this game mode is a Civilian Population count. This will give the Arab states an edge, which will become apparent later. The civilian population is the actual civilian population of each country in 1967. You can bring the civilian population down by Terrorist Attacks (perpetrated by Spies), or bombing campaigns, etc. If the civilian population goes down, it will affect the province morale and soldiers morale (another thing I'd like in this game. For every ten percent below target morale the soldiers are at the start of the game, they lose a Hitpoint. Bytro, plz add soldier morale). The Arab states will have an advantage here as they will start with plenty of spies, who you can send on terrorist attacks or suicide bombings. Israel could also use this to their advantage with total war bombing campaigns, however.
So what do you guys think? I would love to hear your feedback 
Please log in to post a reply.
fr, I'm fine if you insult me nation
bc I know how stupidly incompetent they are, absolutely corrupted bunch of old communist men
This is why I'm more of a westerner, keeping the old traditions, barely changing, stucking with one of the worst ideologies in the planet ain't gonna improve your nation
The government use every information possible to expand nationalism
All we hear over here is that your country is rapidly developing and modernizing out of the communist era… damn media.
I mean... It's improving, but more like on it own.
The government and the prime minister barely change it, the economy is ironically, being developed by the people
Look on the bright side! If human civilization is not wiped out in the next few decades the more progressive new generation may have a chance to change things!
Rise of the young turks....
Anyway, yeah no. Lemme tell you here, asian parenting is absolute DOGSHIT
My class is a great example, they are one the most piece of shit people I have ever seen
crying? use phone
you not liking whatever with your child? beat the shit out of em'
Though I do have a question, what are the western view on Ho Chi Minh
from what I see so far, it's mostly negative
70% don’t know who he is, the majority of the rest see him as a brutal dictator similar to Pol Pot, while a few million more have a positive view.
from my POV, he seem to be a generally chill guy
he's a poet, an actual successful communist
he don't create any massacres or famines (mostly from the USA/France)
sure he's a dictator bc you know, the nation just gone through three wars, military dictatorship is the only thing that can keep things together
the only reasons so many men died for him is bc, he's not a war strategist.
Neither the Viet Cong being the most inexperienced, we kinda just, keep attacking even when we're severly under-supplied, starved, like an endless sneaky horde of zombies yk?
REALCarking the 6th wrote:
yeah
1 million viet cong died
50k us casualities (could be made up)
Myanmar?Carking the 6th wrote:
South East Asian government being competent challenge (impossible)
the most ignored nation
even east timor is more popular than them
70k, they still lost with 1/10 the causalities though lol.KaiserOfAnonymous wrote:
yeah1 million viet cong died
50k us casualities (could be made up)
Prime example.Claudio NVKP wrote:
Myanmar?Carking the 6th wrote:
South East Asian government being competent challenge (impossible)
1/10 of what
I never know myanmar existence until I mistake them with thailand
Well, military dictatorship, genocide.
ofc the first search thing about myanmar is "myanmar genocide"
who would have fucking guessed
CasualtiesKaiserOfAnonymous wrote:
1/10 of whatI never know myanmar existence until I mistake them with thailand
On the bright side. They’ll hopefully be crushed in the civil war.Claudio NVKP wrote:
Well, military dictatorship, genocide.
idk menCarking the 6th wrote:
CasualtiesKaiserOfAnonymous wrote:
1/10 of whatI never know myanmar existence until I mistake them with thailand
On the bright side. They’ll hopefully be crushed in the civil war.Claudio NVKP wrote:
Well, military dictatorship, genocide.
1mil for 70k doesn't sounds like a good ratio to me
My point was that they STILL won with that rate. That’s all.
Well, it's practically impossible. The amount of propaganda is crazy. Rohingya's are gone.
Please log in to post a reply.
