Anyone else miss playing the Mediterranean campaign

No matter what I miss and would like to play all those smaller historical maps. That includes the Sealion one!!

More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.

Zaktty wrote:

More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.

this would even make sense for bytro in terms of bringing money into the game! Nothing to lose here.

I would say make like the home front and 22p map free, but the rest, which require higher levels, should cost gold. This will also incentive people to save gold, and might even decrease gold spending in games (because they want to use gold to get into games etc).

SamPGS_17 wrote:

Zaktty wrote:

More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.

Imo the best way to do that is make games cost gold. Simple as that.

this would even make sense for bytro in terms of bringing money into the game! Nothing to lose here.

I would say make like the home front and 22p map free, but the rest, which require higher levels, should cost gold. This will also incentive people to save gold, and might even decrease gold spending in games (because they want to use gold to get into games etc).

Carking the 6th wrote:

SamPGS_17 wrote:

Zaktty wrote:

More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.

Imo the best way to do that is make games cost gold. Simple as that.this would even make sense for bytro in terms of bringing money into the game! Nothing to lose here.

I would say make like the home front and 22p map free, but the rest, which require higher levels, should cost gold. This will also incentive people to save gold, and might even decrease gold spending in games (because they want to use gold to get into games etc).

That would annoy way to many people. A large portion of the player base may just up and leave, and I wouldn’t blame them. It’s hard to make a profit in gold so you’d be stuck grinding it on the rather boring inactive maps for a very long time. Just wouldn’t work out.

I would argue it’s very easy to make a profit in gold.

I really don’t know about this. Too many players would complain about the game becoming P2W and the player base would cause a lot of backlash.

Carking the 6th wrote:

I really don’t know about this. Too many players would complain about the game becoming P2W and the player base would cause a lot of backlash.

Who says they work just go inactive anyway? It happened as well in those 5k gold HWW’s I joined a couple times in the past.

Carking the 6th wrote:

Who says they work just go inactive anyway? It happened as well in those 5k gold HWW’s I joined a couple times in the past.

1. The people who would usually go inactive would run out of gold

2. More incentive to win the game because you spent something on it so want something back.

On games you have to pay for, it’s so much more likely people stay active. You just can’t really argue against this tbh, some ppl will go inactive yeah thats inevitable, we’re tryna stop the whole map going inactive, which is what happens at the moment unfortunately.

you’re just wrong

On games you have to pay for less people will play. There is no guarantee at all of this working, these is always the risk that it will cause another problem or just not work at all. A free to play game actually requiring premium currency would throw off many new players, I know I wouldn’t have ever gotten into this game if it was like that. The game is already focused on trying to get new players, and the turnover rate is quite high. Making it higher is not exactly the he best decision.

Carking the 6th wrote:

On games you have to pay for less people will play. There is no guarantee at all of this working, these is always the risk that it will cause another problem or just not work at all. A free to play game actually requiring premium currency would throw off many new players, I know I wouldn’t have ever gotten into this game if it was like that. The game is already focused on trying to get new players, and the turnover rate is quite high. Making it higher is not exactly the he best decision.

Not gonna work for Bytro. That’s simply bad for business. Less players means your game will die out and/or you make less money. Not a good thing long term.

Game modes like Mediterranean Theater and 1944 Endgame were removed back in the 1.0 era, which means that if Bytro was to reinstate them, the maps would have to be updated to 2.0 standards. This would take a lot of time and effort, and unless Bytro sees a reasonable benefit to devoting their time to make the maps playable, they won't do it.

I wouldn’t mind waiting tho. More map possibilities would only help attract more players. It’s true that too many players go inactive and that would require another solution itself. Which is why I have an alliance and pretty much only play Ava and internals now.

the gold idea seems like a good one when I read it but like carking mentioned, it’s bad for business. So I don’t know lol

Brando Dilla wrote:

Game modes like Mediterranean Theater and 1944 Endgame were removed back in the 1.0 era, which means that if Bytro was to reinstate them, the maps would have to be updated to 2.0 standards. This would take a lot of time and effort, and unless Bytro sees a reasonable benefit to devoting their time to make the maps playable, they won't do it.

it is still active

@TheZhukov

Love that profile pic and name lol it goes hard. You’ve been playing for a while, right? Seen your name a few times back then

Carking the 6th wrote:

Brando Dilla wrote:

Game modes like Mediterranean Theater and 1944 Endgame were removed back in the 1.0 era, which means that if Bytro was to reinstate them, the maps would have to be updated to 2.0 standards. This would take a lot of time and effort, and unless Bytro sees a reasonable benefit to devoting their time to make the maps playable, they won't do it.

I remember playing 1944 endgame during 1.5, maybe 2.0 once. I think it’s possible to at least bring that one back…

That's prolly my favourite gamemode, unfortunate its rarely used and is very inactive.

Jchicas the Great wrote:

@TheZhukov

Love that profile pic and name lol it goes hard. You’ve been playing for a while, right? Seen your name a few times back then

I think I remember you but I'm not sure

My current cow account is WarWolverine