Both of these ideas are currently being discussed in other threads.
Atlantic wall and weather
I think that you should add realistic weather
In call of war there is a different kinds of terain that effect on game
But why is there no weather that will effect 2
Like in Russia it will be more snow and rain that will slow units...
Idk maybe it is silly but it will be more realistic
In newspaper you have real date(prntscr.com/aijfzs) so you can add real weather in game
Hope you understand me 
One more thing that should be add is new tab in counstruction part
For me they should add one more thing and it is defense part
I would like to see some structures that will be like in atlantic wall
Something like on this picture
That will be big in game
America is always problem in game and now USA power will be lower with this
Hope you like idea
Last thing is sea
I think there should be sea teritorys and borders
Ofxore add more units...
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
16 Replies
Well i am not informed xD
The thing with weather is that it's waaaaaaaay too hard to implement, 'cos weather changes.
Now you areBelgradeBoys wrote:
Well i am not informed xD
Try using the search function in the top right of the page before a post.I'd like weather, but I feel like if we add weather, we'll need troops to counter that weather: ski troops for example (commandos on ski's, idk)
"Hit first ! Hit hard ! Keep on hitting ! ! (The 3 H's)" Admiral Jackie Fisher
"The 3 Requisites for Success – Ruthless, Relentless, Remorseless(The 3 R's)" Admiral Fisher
Crates: a Term used to define any unwanted and unneeded feature in CoW
Game Username: LordStark01
Or mountain troops, yeah.
Mountain troops are different to ski troops, do not mix them up.Pablo22510 wrote:
Or mountain troops, yeah.
I never said they were the same.Quasi-duck wrote:
Mountain troops are different to ski troops, do not mix them up.Pablo22510 wrote:
Or mountain troops, yeah.
Tankbuster said we would need ski troops for winter, then you said "Or mountain troops, yeah". It makes it sound like you were trying to say it was one or the other when they are for completely different things.Pablo22510 wrote:
I never said they were the same.
I meant that we could add ski troops or mountain troops.Quasi-duck wrote:
Tankbuster said we would need ski troops for winter, then you said "Or mountain troops, yeah". It makes it sound like you were trying to say it was one or the other when they are for completely different things.Pablo22510 wrote:
I never said they were the same.
Why would we need mountain troops for ski troop operations? Do you propose sending militia to take out dug-in HT on some plains? Maybe storming some commandos dug-in in a city with a load of LT?Pablo22510 wrote:
I meant that we could add ski troops or mountain troops.
*facepalm*Quasi-duck wrote:
Why would we need mountain troops for ski troop operations? Do you propose sending militia to take out dug-in HT on some plains? Maybe storming some commandos dug-in in a city with a load of LT?Pablo22510 wrote:
I meant that we could add ski troops or mountain troops.
You were suggesting adding units specific for weather. You proposed ski troops. I said that we could also add mountain troops, for mountainous weather and terrain. End of.
I like this idea.
YOU SAID OR!1!!1!!!!Pablo22510 wrote:
I said that we could also add mountain troops, for mountainous weather and terrain.
I know. Apparently I deserve to be shot for a slight slip of the tongue. Well, what I meant is that mountain troops could also be added.
Yes, you doPablo22510 wrote:
Apparently I deserve to be shot for a slight slip of the tongue.

Grand job.Pablo22510 wrote:
mountain troops could also be added
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.