Rockets are not a problem, if they are, you need some practice. Just blitz countries and the problem is solved.
12 Jul 2015, 01:43
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Balancing
The early, and for that matter, later rockets are Over Powered. A V-1 or V-2 rocket was no where near, accurate enough, nor powerful enough to wipe out an entire infantry brigade in one hit. Currently a V-1 does 15 soft damage to units. An infantry unit has 15 hit points. Even a tomahawk cruise missile with conventional warheads can't do that. A nuke could, but not the normal stage rockets. They were terror weapons that were more like strategic bombers in their effect. Unit damage should be lowered significantly to < 5 for V-1 and about 5 for V-2 for example.
Thank you for your consideration.
5 Replies
12 Jul 2015, 08:22
I agree with Mourdeeb. Rockets were not accurate. Half the V2 rockets launched failed to hit their target. I think rockets should have less strength to compensate for that. Not that I have any problems with them.
The past is a foreign country.
12 Jul 2015, 10:55
Well, if you look at the units name, it says it is a rocket battery. So I like to think I am launching a series of rockets. It is the same with planes. I do not think I just build one fighter, I imagine that I built a squadron. I mean, look at it? In WWII when did one strategic bomber drop its load of conventional bombs and do serious damage to a city? This excluding stuff like bouncing bombs etc. because they are not really conventional bombs that you just chuck out of a plane.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
12 Jul 2015, 16:20
Rockets are good at best and I only research them when I got nothing else to research.
12 Jul 2015, 17:50
I research them so I can get the A-missile.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
