For the first one, Burma wasn’t really Indian and the UK needs some colonies in Asia for balance purposes. As for the second, that’s rather trivial. Add Panjim instead.
5 Sept 2023, 17:04
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
BRITISH RAJ AND ITALIAN ZARA IS WRONG IN 30P MAP!
For some reason, the British Raj is not fully historically accurate in the 30P map and I think this needs to be fixed for realism purposes.
This is how it should be. Versus how it is in the game:
Same error goes for the Italian Province of the City of Zara.
This was how it was in the real history (under Italian rule) and this is how it is in the game:
It is under Yugoslavian rule which is very wrong!
Please fix these problems BYTRO. Make this game better 
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
26 Replies
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
6 Sept 2023, 03:52
I didn't say it is Indian, I said it was controlled by the RAJ!Carking the 6th wrote:
For the first one, Burma wasn’t really Indian and the UK needs some colonies in Asia for balance purposes. As for the second, that’s rather trivial. Add Panjim instead.
6 Sept 2023, 03:55
Is this British Raj or British India? Pakistan and Bangladesh were considered Indian at the time, but not Burma. I get where you are coming from but such changes mess up the balance of the game and do not add much. Those lands shouldn’t be cores and you can invade them. In the end, just make it part of the Raj!
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
6 Sept 2023, 04:00
British Raj and British India are the same things, duh.Carking the 6th wrote:
Is this British Raj or British India? Pakistan and Bangladesh were considered Indian at the time, but not Burma. I get where you are coming from but such changes mess up the balance of the game and do not add much. Those lands shouldn’t be cores and you can invade them. In the end, just make it part of the Raj!
6 Sept 2023, 04:01
India is just India, Raj is the whole colony. Either way it’s not worth the developers time to alter such a thing when it doesn’t really affect the game.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
6 Sept 2023, 04:04
BYTRO is already a lazy studio and you are like 'Hey don't make developers do that, hey developers are busy with other things they don't need to add new things!'.Carking the 6th wrote:
India is just India, Raj is the whole colony. Either way it’s not worth the developers time to alter such a thing when it doesn’t really affect the game.
6 Sept 2023, 04:06
Yes. Fixing bugs is more important. This change would honestly make the game worse. There is no point. You acting like changing the borders for something rather trivial is kinda foolish. It’s not that easy to change a game and you are not always right.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
6 Sept 2023, 04:07
It IS a historical map and it claims to have historically accurate borders. So of course there is a point and of course they need to fix it.Carking the 6th wrote:
Yes. Fixing bugs is more important. This change would honestly make the game worse. There is no point. You acting like changing the borders for something rather trivial is kinda foolish. It’s not that easy to change a game and you are not always right.
6 Sept 2023, 04:15
It’s British India, Myanmar is also British, boom. Technically accurate. Either way, not the Raj, it’s an independent India which would never own Burma and therefore disproves your woes. I’m gonna end this here and agree to disagree. No offense, but I don’t want to argue the same 10 points that you never try to Address.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
6 Sept 2023, 07:40
Your map is from 1909. Burma was separated from the Raj in 1937 and received a sort of self-governance. It should be either British or its own thing, not Indian. Bytro is correct.
You are right on Zara, it would be best to make it Italian occupied but Yugoslavian Core, if possible.
6 Sept 2023, 08:43
Yes, agree with Chimere’s post
@Carking the 6th and @John Lackland are wrong here. British India was The British Raj and Burma was included until 1937. Since the game in mention is based on 1939 borders, no. There is no ‘balancing’ involved. It’s History. Same as Ceylon (though it was never a part of the Raj). Burma was not a part of British India (Raj) after 1937
As for Zadar, there were several threads about this I believe, along with reasons.
Overall this idea gets a ‘Homework not done’ 3.5/10
The President
6 Sept 2023, 08:48
He’s Montenegrin? The same guy that made the add Greece in HWW thread.Carking the 6th wrote:
I get where you are coming from but such changes mess up the balance of the game and do not add much.
The President
6 Sept 2023, 11:34
What is your source on Burma separated in 1937 from the Raj?Chimere wrote:
Your map is from 1909. Burma was separated from the Raj in 1937 and received a sort of self-governance. It should be either British or its own thing, not Indian. Bytro is correct.You are right on Zara, it would be best to make it Italian occupied but Yugoslavian Core, if possible.
6 Sept 2023, 11:40
Any "Burma" + "1937" in Google should give you one bazillion sources, starting with Wikipedia.John Lackland wrote:
What is your source on Burma separated in 1937 from the Raj?Chimere wrote:
Your map is from 1909. Burma was separated from the Raj in 1937 and received a sort of self-governance. It should be either British or its own thing, not Indian. Bytro is correct.You are right on Zara, it would be best to make it Italian occupied but Yugoslavian Core, if possible.
6 Sept 2023, 11:57
Lol
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
6 Sept 2023, 21:39
When Goa?
(Jk, Im thankful for the devs that listened to my post and added Timor-Leste)
"Its Voring time"
Hermann Goering (TNO) -c. 1960
Hermann Goering (TNO) -c. 1960
6 Sept 2023, 21:40
Add Panjim! Add Panjim! Add Panjim!Cecil Rhodes. wrote:
When Goa?(Jk, Im thankful for the devs that listened to my post and added Timor-Leste)
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
7 Sept 2023, 06:45
After my research, I see that you are right about it. But there is still a Zadar problem that needs to be fixed. As the previous guy said, this is a historical map so it needs no balance, please don't come to me with that 'Hey! Doing that would disturb the balance between nations!'Chimere wrote:
Any "Burma" + "1937" in Google should give you one bazillion sources, starting with Wikipedia.John Lackland wrote:
What is your source on Burma separated in 1937 from the Raj?Chimere wrote:
Your map is from 1909. Burma was separated from the Raj in 1937 and received a sort of self-governance. It should be either British or its own thing, not Indian. Bytro is correct.You are right on Zara, it would be best to make it Italian occupied but Yugoslavian Core, if possible.
7 Sept 2023, 11:48
It needs a historical balance, so yes, that would disturb the unequal balance between nations! It’s so minor and pointless that it’s a waste of time, why change that when there are a thousand other things you can do? Plus you’d have to add another city to Yugoslavia to replace it, and then you’d also need to remove one from Italy.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
7 Sept 2023, 16:18
You are really a bigoted normie my friend, never open to new things and specially things that should be done to make this game god tier.Carking the 6th wrote:
It needs a historical balance, so yes, that would disturb the unequal balance between nations! It’s so minor and pointless that it’s a waste of time, why change that when there are a thousand other things you can do? Plus you’d have to add another city to Yugoslavia to replace it, and then you’d also need to remove one from Italy.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
