Militia:
Please log in to post a reply.
I think it is a picture, doing that is not easyTorspo2 wrote:
The new icon for british armored car is misleading. The car is too big in the picture. It looks so huge, or at least that's what she said.And the Artillery and AT looks very similar. Maybe lift the shaft part a little on the artillery.
It would be better if you had the valentine and Matilda as light tanks. They are more famous and widely use especially in north africa
k some late but anyway.
i belive this is a better distribuition of british tanks
armored cars:
1. Lanchester Armoured Car Mk II
2. Guy Armoured Car
3. Daimler Armoured Car
4. Coventry Armoured Car
5. AEC Armoured Car
light tanks:
1. Light tank MK VI
2. Light tank tetrarch
3. Tank cruiser mk II
4. Tank cruiser mk IV
5. Tank cruiser mk VI Crusader
medium tanks:
1. Vickers Medium Mark I
2. Valentine tank mk II
3. Matilda II
4. Tank cruiser cromwell
5. Tank cruiser comet 1
6. Centurion tank
heavy tanks:
1. Churchill tank MK IV
2. Churchill tank MK VIII
3. Black Prince tank
4. FV 214 Conqueror
tank destroyer:
1. 2-pounder Anti-tank Gun Carrier
2. deacon
3. archer
4. churchill gun carrier
5. avenger
6. tortoise heavy assault gun
SP anti-air:
1. Mounted Qf13-pounder
2. Crusader AA mk I
3. Crusader AA mk II
4. Skink anti-aircraft tank
5. Centaur AA mk II
I know that this thread hasn't been used in a while but has anyone bothered to try to adapt the Commonwealth research to the new doctrines?
I know that this thread hasn't been used in a while but has anyone bothered to try to adapt the Commonwealth research to the new doctrines?whowh wrote:
I know that this thread hasn't been used in a while but has anyone bothered to try to adapt the Commonwealth research to the new doctrines?
Well, after all every ex-Commonwealth nation except Burma has the Allied doctrine in World at War, so it pretty much snaps in place.whowh wrote:
It's all games and fun until you have to build the Nationalist Chinese tech tree.
Lol. It would just be militia and borrowed foreign units. Maybe the doctrinal disadvantage could be more rebellions and food shortages?vietcong2005 wrote:
It's all games and fun until you have to build the Nationalist Chinese tech tree.
i two games o have done so far British equipment is missing allied tech is almost all american even to the point of near fantasy
your tech trees are off the mark almost as far as the current mostly american allied .it runs from pre war to post war and experimental and some never used
Yes I have noticed that problem before. I remember the allied heavy tank used to have the Churchill tank skin. However, all the blueprints were American heavy tanks. They removed that graphic about a year ago. Also, for the allied battleship skin it has a British battleship skin. However, the battleship blueprints were actually American.
The Interceptors are also commonwealth planes. The SP arties are also technically British as the 'Priest' SP arty (the low level skin) was a British design although produced by the Americans. The later SP arty design in the game is American as the later SP arty design used by the Brits was the 'Bishop'vietcong2005 wrote:
Yes I have noticed that problem before. I remember the allied heavy tank used to have the Churchill tank skin. However, all the blueprints were American heavy tanks. They removed that graphic about a year ago. Also, for the allied battleship skin it has a British battleship skin. However, the battleship blueprints were actually American.
the single tank british had the most of is missing from everyone tech tree. i know it is us lend lease over 3k of them where made was the honey tank.
This actually sounds rather exciting if they add something like this to the game it would be cool but i don't know how they would fit it in the doctrines seems as there is already an "allied" tech tree. But I get why you did this, most of the allied tech tree is american and it's a bit dull
Nuclear Battleship:
That was a tank. Not a tank destroyer.Danieliyoverde123 wrote:
5. sherman firefly
but their cannon was specifically made to piercing armor, so they basically can be used as a tank destroyerTre wrote:
That was a tank. Not a tank destroyer.Danieliyoverde123 wrote:
5. sherman firefly
(note even though I am a recruit here I am a level 85 player) I would say somewhere on the tanks list should be a Sherman firefly a British modification of the Sherman
oh and the RP-3 and the Disney bomb were British rockets so were others I will name later
I think the Meteor should be level 6, and the Vampire at level 7. What you could do for level 5 instead could be the Spitfire Mk 24 and have like the Spitfire Mk IX at level 4.
On another note, the Achilles already exists in the American doctrine tank destroyer tree for level 3, so we'd need another tank destroyer in that tree if the Achilles is gonna be moved to the British one. We could move everything down a level and make the level 6 be an elite version of the T95, or we could potentially use the M8 Scout as like a level 1 or 2 and move the others up a level. And while we are on the topic of the American tree, why isn't the Jumbo in the tree?
if im not wrong the lvl 3 medium tank of allies is the sherman jumbo.rushbin wrote:
why isn't the Jumbo in the tree?
Please log in to post a reply.
